Why should I care about CASAA's latest Call to Action?

[Butters78]

If it wasn't for snus, my husband would be still smoking even using his e-cigarette. We had him up to 36 mg and he still felt "something missing." I estimate that about 25% of e-cigarette users are part of of the "something missing" group (if not more since many just quit vaping and go back to smoking.) It really sucks that it is very expensive and difficult to get quality snus for him in the US and any tax increases hurt us a LOT because we are by no means wealthy. So, I am extremely grateful that CASAA also fights for smoke-free tobacco users' right to access to affordable, reduced harm products other than e-cigarettes!

I quit smoking in 2010 with snus myself and I'm glad you guys support snus use as well.

 

[p-doze]

switched to snus with the occasional cig 2 years ago after that 60 minutes special on how "safe" it is

 

[budynbuick]

I guess I'm just having a hard time understanding why ecigs(I hate that word) are grouped with smokeless tobacco since e-cigs don't have any tobacco. I would think the e-cig community would want to distance themselves from tobacco products.

IMO this is more about freedom of choice then smokeless or not. If we stand by & allow them to go after smokeless (or even smoking) then each personal choice is isolated & picked off one @ a time. Divide & conquer. Even if one is anti smoke they should defend the right of another to choose smoking. I don't care for porn, but it is not my (nor the gov)right to force (legislate)others not to watch porn. A free man should be able to choose his own course. Non vapors already resent us & kicking the smokeless crowd to the curb will not change that one iota. I like what CASAA is doing with this.

 

[Butters78]

Snus has been reported as extremely safe, been around over 100 years and no documented cases of cancer.