You know, it took DECADES for America to ban smoking in public places, never mind private businesses. They didn't get the majority of the public to support a ban until they had ample scientific proof that firsthand and secondhand smoke are dangerous. (I have my doubts that the research is completely honest re: the secondhand smoke. I think they've blown it way out of proportion and have greatly exaggerated the risks, but that's not the issue here. Smoking is just plain stupid and we all know it, so we don't really fight back.)
Why is it that the anti-smoking (anti-smoker, really) groups feel they have the right to lump vaping in with smoking when it is patently NOT smoking?
There is no law against vaping, it is not a tobacco product, it doesn't burn, it's not smoking... period. If I want to vape nic-free juice with pure diluted caffeine in it, is that smoking? Frankly, it's outrageous.
Why is it that the anti-smoking (anti-smoker, really) groups feel they have the right to lump vaping in with smoking when it is patently NOT smoking?
There is no law against vaping, it is not a tobacco product, it doesn't burn, it's not smoking... period. If I want to vape nic-free juice with pure diluted caffeine in it, is that smoking? Frankly, it's outrageous.