Interesting thoughts can be found here: Confused about Diacetyl? You should be - read now | Page 6 | E-Cigarette Forum
Please read the post above mine in that thread also.
Can you put that in layman's terms?
Interesting thoughts can be found here: Confused about Diacetyl? You should be - read now | Page 6 | E-Cigarette Forum
Please read the post above mine in that thread also.
This is really interesting and certainly worthy of further investigation but doesn’t make sense in terms of the 5P situation. If 5P believe this:Interesting thoughts can be found here: Confused about Diacetyl? You should be - read now | Page 6 | E-Cigarette Forum
Please read the post above mine in that thread also.
It doesn't bother me at all if people decide to vape liquids that contain high levels of diketones. You own your body, do as you please with it. What bothers me is when people continue to patronize companies who've engaged in deceptive business practices and used intimidation in an attempt to suppress the info when those deceptive practiced were exposed.
My hopes are much more radical than that. Ideally, the free market would kill off companies who conduct themselves in such a manner. I don't care whether they reformulate their juices or not. The level of diketones in the products they sell is not the issue here. I don't have a problem with anyone selling juice with a high level of diketones if that's what customers want to buy. To me the issue is product misrepresentation and then attempting to silence and intimidate someone who called them on it by publishing independent test results. I find that unacceptable and believe it should have serious consequences.Ditto! Well said! My hope is that 5P will seize an opportunity to help the industry and their own image/brand by making a clear and unambiguous (NO SPIN) statement/pledge to reformulate their juices, provide lab reports on each and every sell page, and change their labeling. Then do it! IF you share this view or only want 5P to reformulate and state this, please send them your polite, civil, and respectful thoughts via their Contact Us page. A few thousand submissions might convince them.
specifically,who lied to who and when?Except inhaling dyketones is worse than standing on a street corner and we have conclusive data to corroborate.
Some juices show dyketone levels higher than cigarettes and higher than found in the air in the factories that began the whole dyketone revelation. These companies know that their products contain high dyketone levels and are LYING to their customers!
STOP THE APOLOGETICS. This is unconscionable behavior!
Do not support "our e-juice makers" unless they are supporting US.
specificly who lie
specifically,who lied to who and when?
this is what confuses me.the story lines of all these
supposed controversy's changes from thread to thread.
it really hard to get a grip on what is what.
regards
mike
FP published their 2014 test results for the first time at the end of June 2015 showing very high a/p levels in some of their juices.specifically,who lied to who and when?
Russ... Is not a guy who represents me.
Nor is he suited for the job to represent anyone in the vape community.
...
Like this is the first vendor in your life who lied?!?FP published their 2014 test results for the first time at the end of June 2015 showing very high a/p levels in some of their juices.
Prior to this they had told customers and retailers there was no da/ap in their juices.
Therefore between Sept/Oct 2014 and end of June 2015 they misprepresented their products and lied to customers and retailers
This hasn't come from some tabloid reporter - this has come from 5P themselves. So are you saying you think this is acceptable?Like this is the first vendor in your life who lied?!?
Too Funny...
If only the whole truth were known about everybody and everything.
Time to move on to the next pile of crap some Tabloid Reporter talks about.
Not particularly. Vape as much DA/AP as you want but I won't be joining you.
If your ejuice has not been tested with a standardized test... You may very well be... Joining me.
Cheers, Jim
Hmm silence is golden.
All of the facts are not yet known about Vaping.This hasn't come from some tabloid reporter - this has come from 5P themselves. So are you saying you think this is acceptable?
Well I would call the above more than speculation. Anyway I have posted 2 comments on 5P 'info' page - it does say they are welcome, although there are currently 0 comments and mine have been 'awaiting moderation' for a number of days. I have asked them:FP published their 2014 test results for the first time at the end of June 2015 showing very high a/p levels in some of their juices.
Prior to this they had told customers and retailers there was no da/ap in their juices.
Therefore between Sept/Oct 2014 and end of June 2015 they misprepresented their products and lied to customers and retailers
The more information we gather, the less speculation we we will be forced to attempt. Cloud 9 took action that led Five Pawns to share information that that they appear to have withheld. It's a good thing.
Well I would call the above more than speculation. Anyway I have posted 2 comments on 5P 'info' page - it does say they are welcome, although there are currently 0 comments and mine have been 'awaiting moderation' for a number of days. I have asked them:
Can you confirm that the tests linked to are your most recent ones? (i.e. Sept/ Oct 2014)? &
You say Five Pawns does not feel there is any concern with diacetyl or AP in our e-liquids at current levels.’ Could you tell me what levels you would consider unacceptable?
I will post when I get a response (I am expecting it to take some time)
All of the facts are not yet known about Vaping.
Until they are, all of this is mere speculation.
Jim