This is criminal. Thank you for your work to uncover their misconduct.
I have posted this info in a few other forums myself
I'm just going to play devil's advocate here to keep people on the right track. Just which part is criminal? Is it the part where they sent out some highly concentrated nic liquid, or is the part where they sent out a letter stating that could not possibly happen?This is criminal. Thank you for your work to uncover their misconduct.
In the other thread there was a conspiracy theory that doesn't seem as far fetched now. It wouldn't be that difficult for the FDA or a crazy anti-smoking advocate to open up shop selling nicotine and eLiquid and do something like this just to show the world e-cigs are dangerous. I'm not saying I believe this to be the case but it doesn't seem as much of a stretch now.
Ha ha, Salem, you've been a busy little bee There are currently 90 persons browsing this thread.
Is that your doing?
so, Kurt: what would be the best test to figure out what already mixed down batches are? i cut all of mine down to what i hope is 18mg and mixed it with vg before sticking it in the freezer. it was originally 100mg. just use the test from e-bay?
ETA: If BE can prove that they care about their consumers and that they are taking the correct measures to make sure that their product is safe/top quality, I MIGHT give them a chance; but with the other issues, it's a small chance.
Estimated time of arrival?
You might be on to the other thing, though. They're coming for us. I thing big tobacco would be more responsible for this, though. We're showing that we still want to smoke, but don't want their product.
Thanks for the reply Kurt. I do hope that you will consider contacting BE with your results.
I'm just going to play devil's advocate here to keep people on the right track. Just which part is criminal? Is it the part where they sent out some highly concentrated nic liquid, or is the part where they sent out a letter stating that could not possibly happen?
Thing is, mistakes happen all the time. Some mistakes can have very unfortunate results, while others wont cause any harm to anyone. As far as we know, this mistake didn't hurt anyone, thank God. But, they do happen. If it were criminal that they made the mistake, then is it criminal that they bottled it wrong, or criminal that they didn't test?
As far as I can tell, none of the suppliers are testing, so every single one falls under the same scrutiny as BE. Is that what you're trying to say?