I killed this thread, eh? Bwahahahaha
I think it's a reflexive wanna know reflex, like when you find out that Burt's Bees is owned by Clorox and not some nice little old guy in Vermont...
Originally Posted by darkhood:
even the guy who makes the beloved pluid...all he's doing is combined licorice, absinthe, etc from other companies.
Even if that were true----- everything people do or make is interpretive, and based on their own unique perceptions and senses. That's why the meatloaf analogy is so workable.
Painting with Sennelier's oil paints doesn't make you Picasso or Gauguin, and conversely, some of the greatest photography in history was made with a primitive pin-hole camera without even the benefit of a simple lens.
Put me in a room with access to the "same stuff" as everyone else, and my DIY is going to be sub-par. It's not something I'm "good at" but many have a natural knack for mixing and creating.
It's really interesting looking at DIY recipes here on ECF, people will put a few drops of lemon into something I never in a million years thought would "go with" the rest of the flavorings, but it's brilliant and works.
There is also the element of randomness. Some mixers will tell you that one of their most popular juices started out almost accidental. I love that!
That would never happen to me, as I was a child who always colored "inside the lines" LOL Awful, isn't it? But it has it's place, too.
OP is talking about a phenomenon where vendors (in the crudest sense of the word) are not just selling liquids with common flavorings, using popular recipes, or having others make their juice, but this particular phenomenon of literally reselling juices that exist already, and labeling them as original concoctions is unfortunately happening more than most people know.
<snip>
this act of relabeling preexisting juices is happening and no one should be surprised by this.
Aha. Well I do know that even vendors that sell "genuine" Joyetech Ego batts, for example, have put their own logo on the batts, which i wonder if they have a special relationship with Joyetech to do that, cuz Joyetech is rather possessive about their brand.
I was not aware of re-labelling of juice though. I do see that COV sells Boba's Bounty, but it's called that, even though their own label is on it. I have never thought to "compare' the bobas from AVE and the bobas from COV.
I realize this isn't the same thing, but starting to bleed over in a way.
Re-labelling somebody else's juice, and calling it something else to boot, just seems like a cheap way to sell good juice w/out securing certain business "permissions" from the original mixers/creators. It may be "just business" but certainly doesn't meet ethical business standards.
I was not aware of re-labelling of juice though. I do see that COV sells Boba's Bounty, but it's called that, even though their own label is on it. I have never thought to "compare' the bobas from AVE and the bobas from COV.
I realize this isn't the same thing, but starting to bleed over in a way.
No one can get away with relabelling Boba's.
I don't consider it any kind of 'bad' if things get relabeled and rebranded. But as a consumer I would like to know.
I had it with some diy flavors. I recently saw some at a vendor I was already ordering something else from. But in the end I refrained since I did not know where the flavors came from. And I'd like to know what I'm buying.
Imagine you are looking for a good strawberry juice or flavor. So you order from ten different vendors. With this rebranding/relabeling without been given information about the orginal maker. You can end up with five strawberries which are exactly the same. Which can be good if you like it since now you can choose your favorite vendor to order from. But if you don't like it you end up with five bottles of it.
And you'll continue to accidentally buy this stuff if vendors don't properly show where their product came from.
RH, trust me, I edited out all of my real opinions on the matter. But some vendors do wholesale their juice for those purposes. I don't think it's so much of an issue for ecig vendors that sell all types of equipment, but for a straight-up liquid vendor, that is quite silly.
Agreed! I don't see the sense in this myself...
Well, made in the USA can mean just about anything now. You can buy all the parts in China and if you assemble it in part in the USA, you can stamp it made in the USA. I know the markup in the juice market is many times higher than for hardware and that the cost of ingredients is so low compared to the juices' retail prices that it does seem like a ripoff. It is similar to pharmaceutical companies where the price may be 100 times the cost but then again no one else has the recipe.
I don't know any online vendors who engage in this practice off hand but my local shop does. They buy DeKang and fill up their own bottles with their logo on it. It sucks because you can get a 50ml of DeKang for a dollar more then what they sell a 10ml for at MadVapes. I usually only use this store when I'm in a pinch while waiting on an internet order from a reliable vendor. Now they are offering USA made liquids which I'm willing to bet is just another company subtracted to make their juice with their label on it. Thing became more clear when I asked PG/VG ratios and they had no clue then finally one day I asked straight out if this was just DeKang and one of the employees let it slip it was. Also sucks because they offer some low quality products, like atomizers that blow out in 2 days, and everything in the store is 2/3s more expensive then even the pricier online sites. Like I said its good for a pinch when waiting on an order but it just sucks, I fear with the low quality gear they are turning more people off vaping then turning them on. /end rant