Assuming the topic of this thread is still good (i.e. people are still interested in other subjects in addition to the alleged addictiveness of nicotine), here are some solid #s which refute the two "gateway" arguments.
For reference, these arguments are:
a) Non-smokers (alledgedly) take up vaping, and then get addicted to nicotine.
b) Non-smokers (allegedly) take up vaping, and then move to analog cigarettes.
Here's the evidence:
1) U. OK study on 1300 college students - average age 19. Only 43 (3%) indicated that vaping was their first exposure to a nicotine product. Only
one continued to use any nicotine product at all.
http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2013/10/first-study-to-examine-e-cigarette.html (I can't seem to find the original study).
2) ASH (UK ANTZ org) concedes that the 1.3M English vapers, are "almost entirely" composed of tobacco smokers or former smokers: http://
ash.org.uk/files/documents/ASH_715.pdf (link was split up, in accordance with ECF's policy).
3) Smoking among minors in the US is
down, despite an increase in the rate of experimentation with vaping:
http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2013/11/despite-drastic-increase-in-electronic.html
For my time and money, the effort required to convince most folks that nicotine isn't addictive, and/or is relatively harmless ... well, I personally view it as lost cause. Just because something's true, doesn't mean that one can convince a stubborn person to believe it (just ask Galileo about the Catholic Church's belief that the sun goes around the earth
What I think I could convince them of, is that: people who vape are virtually all (ex-)smokers ... at least in the US and the UK. And vaping leads
away from smoking tobacco - not
towards it.
The current numbers show this, regardless of public health officials' "fears," or "unknowns" or even "concerns" (you know, those
scientific emotions