Interesting news emerging in Asian media (strange that). I've seen several sources
White House scrapped FDA plan to restrict flavored e-cigarettes
White House scrapped FDA plan to restrict flavored e-cigarettes
Interesting... and yet they had no problem with the rest of it?Interesting news emerging in Asian media (strange that). I've seen several sources
White House scrapped FDA plan to restrict flavored e-cigarettes
Interesting... and yet they had no problem with the rest of it?
Apparently not.
As for banning flavors, why bother? All that FDA needs to do now to ban flavors is to reject every single PMTA for flavored eliquids. Problem solved. I think Azim mentioned it also somewhere, but I'm not sure. Information (disinformation, misinformation) overload.![]()
That's kinda the Rub in the whole Flavor Banning/Not Banning issue.
What's the Difference? If they are just going to Round File PMTA's for e-Liquids if they have Flavors that the current FDA doesn't want.
FTFYThat's kinda the Rub in the whole Flavor Banning/Not Banning issue.
What's the Difference? If they are just going to Round File PMTA's for e-Liquids.
Right.
Again (and only because it amuses me no end), as our friend Nate brilliantly stated elsewhere, "As the law is now written, FDA has the full legal authority to reject a PMTA application by tweeting "lolsux2bu"."
FTFY
That's not my definition of e-liquid. That would be a sealed, non-refillable, finished tobacco product. When I say e-liquid I mean something that comes in a bottle used to fill a vapor product.Oh they will approve some PMTA's for e-Liquids.
Unfortunately, if something doesn't change, those e-Liquids are gunna come in a Nice, 1.2ml Prefilled carrying case, that screws onto the end of a BT/BV e-Cigarette.
Feeling charitable tonight, Kent C?![]()
Not really - just taking what was written about 'deleting the rationale' and what the rationale wasThat said, I'm surprised that it came from an Obama OMB.
Not really - just taking what was written about 'deleting the rationale' and what the rationale wasThat said, I'm surprised that it came from an Obama OMB.
Really? What rational individual would willingly work in such an environment?I'm sure that even a bureaucracy is comprised of some rational individuals
That's not my definition of e-liquid. That would be a sealed, non-refillable, finished tobacco product. When I say e-liquid I mean something that comes in a bottle used to fill a vapor product.
Really? What rational individual would willingly work in such an environment?
Unless something Significant happens, do you foresee this Definition of an e-Liquid being relevant in 2 Years?
Right, but e-liquid as a "product" to be used for a potential SE application. My point is, they're not talking about a bottle of liquid, they're talking about liquid inside of a cartridge. So don't get your hopes up.imho eliquid comes in the pre-filled thingys and the bottles as well. Both applications use eliquid of the same composition. And results in the same thing, vapor being produced/inhaled.