Right, but e-liquid as a "product" to be used for a potential SE application. My point is, they're not talking about a bottle of liquid, they're talking about liquid inside of a cartridge. So don't get your hopes up.
I'm not. Hence Post #8.

Right, but e-liquid as a "product" to be used for a potential SE application. My point is, they're not talking about a bottle of liquid, they're talking about liquid inside of a cartridge. So don't get your hopes up.
Interesting news emerging in Asian media (strange that). I've seen several sources
White House scrapped FDA plan to restrict flavored e-cigarettes
Interesting... and yet they had no problem with the rest of it?
Yeah, just going for clarity, because people don't always read. If you say "there will be some approved e-liquids, they'll just be inside sealed cartridges" what some people will see is "there will be some approved e-liquids."
Not positive, a congressional act to amend the FSPTCA probably?Yeah... And a standardize text Colour for Sarcasm would be a good addition to the ECF.
---
So what exactly would be the Mechanics of the Next President or the Next Congress to Modify something like the "Deeming" Rule Set or the PMTA for ENDS?
That is, if the Next President or Next Congress had such a Desire.
Yeah... And a standardize text Colour for Sarcasm would be a good addition to the ECF.
---
So what exactly would be the Mechanics of the Next President or the Next Congress to Modify something like the "Deeming" Rule Set or the PMTA for ENDS?
That is, if the Next President or Next Congress had such a Desire.
~What?! Sarcasm punctuation, what will you think of next?!~![]()
That's kinda the Rub in the whole Flavor Banning/Not Banning issue.
What's the Difference? They are just going to Round File PMTA's for e-Liquids.
imho eliquid comes in the pre-filled thingys and the bottles as well. Both applications use eliquid of the same composition. And results in the same thing, vapor being produced/inhaled.
I know. I was just teasing you. They are supposed to be apolitical number crunchers. Which is why I'm disappointed that they didn't object to the whole thing, frankly, as completely unworkable, unreasonable and disastrous for the entire industry.
They can't K. They're tied to their mortgages like the most of us. Sad it is. Good luck.![]()
I really would not worry as much as people are doing if I were an American. UK has more vapours than in the whole of America (4.5 million vapours which is 45% of all smokers) and is actively encouraging it. We have a law that specifically states that export and import of e products is legal, and a lot of our pre-made comes from the states. (UK is turning a blind eye to the silly 10ml thing) Worst comes to the worst you will all just have to import "candle oil, not for human consumption" from us and with international shipping so fast and cheap these days there won't be too much difference.
Well, they think they do. How long until someone challenges them in court, when the product that was seized, let's say a shipment of mods or atties, contains no nicotine or anything else in any way made from tobacco?I don't see the Situation in the UK as a reason why US Vapers should not be Very Worried.
Just because something is Legal to Sell or Export in the UK does not mean that US Vaper can effectively Skirt FDA Regulations.
And it will be like Deja vu from 2009 with US Customs sieging packages. Only this time, the FDA WILL have the Legal Authority to do so.
Well, they think they do. How long until someone challenges them in court, when the product that was seized, let's say a shipment of mods or atties, contains no nicotine or anything else in any way made from tobacco?
Well, they think they do. How long until someone challenges them in court, when the product that was seized, let's say a shipment of mods or atties, contains no nicotine or anything else in any way made from tobacco?