The costs of running this huge site are paid for by ads. Please consider registering and becoming a Supporting Member for an ad-free experience. Thanks, ECF team.
  1. Dear Guest, 

    ECF will be down for an extended period Tuesday 25th January from 6am central / 7am Eastern. 

    This is due to a server migration. With any luck we'll by open by lunchtime. Thanks in advance for your patience :)

    @low_tar_neil



    Dismiss Notice

4081 Atty question.

Discussion in 'Atomizer Mods' started by petercro, Jan 22, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Image has been removed.
URL has been removed.
Email address has been removed.
Media has been removed.
  1. petercro

    petercro Super Member ECF Veteran

    Could anyone help.
    I have a requirement to block both air inlet holes in a RN4081 atomizer.
    If I inserted a mouthpiece into the atomizer, would the airflow requirements of the atty be satisfied.
    Hard to explain check picture for airflow diagram.


    Just to clarify the yellow block represents the coil.
    The airflow entering the atty would be through a straw sized inlet. 1 to 1.5mm dia approx.

    Thanks
    Petercro..........
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Marctwo

    Marctwo Senior Member ECF Veteran

    Dec 13, 2009
    U.K
    Disclaimer: I don't know the 4081 atty so I may be talking rubbish. :D

    As it's drawn, the airflow wouldn't go beneath the coil. It'd only go as far as the air channels in the mouthpiece and then straight out again.

    It should work to some extent if you pipe the air directly to the bottom of the atty, as close to the internal airtake hole as possible. A pain in the neck to do though.
     
  3. MastiffMike

    MastiffMike The Spotted Tongue! Verified Member ECF Veteran

    Aug 9, 2009
    Dogville Estate
    I'm FAR from an expert so I may be completely wrong.... Just thinking out loud here....

    What if you put another air hole (say on the opposite side from the stock one?) and then you built a "sleeve" that wrapped the atty like your diagram is showing just with an air flow channel on both sides? So from the top it'd be oval shaped. This would double the air flow coming in from the sides of the atty, therefore making up for the loss of flow from the bottom.

    If I'm completely wrong = ignore this post
    If I'm even partial correct = I'll be floored!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice