I initiated discussions with my employer on the use of electronic cigarettes. I asked genrally about looking in to a vaping policy and then it went out of my hands. It went for discussion at a meeting that I had no invite to and the people involved at the meeting had not spoken to any vapers to garner any information about them. So the meeting had representation from HR, Property Services, Health & Safety and the Health and Wellbeing Committee. All representatives being non-smokers/never smoked people. The Health and Wellbeing Committee are tied in to our 'Attendance Strategy' and believe me, what they claim to do to support the strategy is completely at odds with having a closed meeting to decide on a policy amongst a handful of ill informed people who wouldn't engage or discuss with any vapers.
As a result of the meeting they decided that they would, to quote, "treat the product in the same manner as normal cigarettes". They seemed to have tried to make a concession in that saying we were allowed to use them in the grounds, BUT - away from opening windows, and must be to rear of the building. So given the layout of the place, that basically means if it's raining then you have to use the smoking shelter.
I've written a response to the outcome of the meeting, detailing the discprencies in their knowledge and their decisions based on their inaccurate information. Again, they fail to engage, despite claims in the attendance strategy to engage with staff. This decision came out two and a half weeks ago. Frankly, I've still nopt calmed down.

As a result of the meeting they decided that they would, to quote, "treat the product in the same manner as normal cigarettes". They seemed to have tried to make a concession in that saying we were allowed to use them in the grounds, BUT - away from opening windows, and must be to rear of the building. So given the layout of the place, that basically means if it's raining then you have to use the smoking shelter.
I've written a response to the outcome of the meeting, detailing the discprencies in their knowledge and their decisions based on their inaccurate information. Again, they fail to engage, despite claims in the attendance strategy to engage with staff. This decision came out two and a half weeks ago. Frankly, I've still nopt calmed down.
