Not defending anybody. Rather, wondering why you're trying to make this "political" (I never thought there would be such a thing as e-cig politics when I began this, but here we are).
Even if I happen to be wrong (about nothing but a nebulous and vague curiosity in my own mind, which hardly qualifies as the degree of assumption you presented, and also happens to have more evidence to back it up), the point stands just as valid as it would if I were right.
There are any number of vendors who, at this very moment, fit FreakyStylie's description. So going on a rant about your assumption of who it is, is quite likely to be wrong, and is also not helpful, and is further more politicized and divisive.
That is the point. As you're quite well aware.