An Interesting, Informative and Alarming Article: How Big Tobacco Went To War With A Tiny Country

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tamer El-Meehy

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 30, 2014
3,632
16,115
Cairo, Egypt, Egypt
Seems the greed and brutality of tobacco companies have no limits..and the fight for the right to vape and find an alternative to smoking is taking other global dimensions.

This is an article written by Will Freeman on how Philip Morris is suing Uruguay and asking for a $25 million in compensation on the grounds of its imposing excessive controls on smoking. Realizing the health and developmental costs of smoking, Uruguay was the first Latin American nation to ban smoking in enclosed public places, and has moved further to require cigarette packs to be 80 percent covered by health warnings. Their efforts paid off and they were able to reduce the prevalence of smoking among the population aged 14-25 by 44% in less than 3 years. According to the President of the tobacco Epidemic Research Center in Montevideo:
Uruguay has the highest rates of death from lung cancer among men in Latin America. Ninety percent of these deaths are related to tobacco,
he said.
The cost of tobacco-related health care spending per year is at least triple the amount of revenue the government receives from tobacco. It is affecting our health, our economy and our development.
Legal fees that Uruguay is expected to incur in this legal battle is estimated to be $8 million!!!...Uruguay, like many other developing countries (where 4 of every 5 smokers live) cannot afford such fees, and definitely cannot afford the $25 million fine, and if Philip Morris wins the battle several other developing countries will be forced to back down on their plans to protect the health of their peoples.

One final note..according to the article, Philip Morris'
annual profits exceed the annual GDP of Uruguay
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/...40714/uruguay-v-philip-morris-tobacco-smoking

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/07/21/3462255/latin-american-country-big-tobacco/

I really hope we can do something about this..this greed and brutality should be stopped!!..I hope we manage to come up with ideas and suggestions.

Tamer
 
Last edited:

crxess

Grumpy Ole Man
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 20, 2012
24,438
46,126
71
Williamsport Md
I hope they sue for health care costs like the states in the U.S. did.

You are joking right? All that did was raise the cost per pack. The Smoker still picks up ALL the cost and everyone else lines their pockets.:facepalm:

Even Insurance companies do not give you Discounts because you don't Smoke(no matter what they say) They simply Charge Smokers more and add to the bottom line.
It is called Feel Good Business Practice.
 

Uma

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 4, 2010
5,991
9,998
Calif
"The cigarette maker insists it actually supports most anti-smoking measures worldwide. And citing academic studies — some of which the company funded itself — it claims health warnings on packs don’t even reduce smoking.

We take issue with regulation that strips a legal industry of its property, denies access to basic due process, or lacks a scientific basis,” said Julie Soderlund, Philip Morris International’s vice president of communications."

Why Uruguay's Fight With Big Tobacco Matters - NBC News

Sooooooo brutal is right, but it's not the smoke company that's being the bullies here.

Off to google contraband in Uruguay. Those ex-smokers the TCI is so proud to count usually show up in these tallies.

im back. Too many articles on that to pick. Talk about contraband havens... (Brazil) Parguay, Uruguay, yaddayadda.

Off to to google eCig bans in Uruguay.
Well, well, well, imagine that. They've been ban happy since 2009.
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/legislation-news/50689-e-cigs-banned-uruguay.html
Oh, and google has tons more to choose from, once again, too many to pick from.

Ooooorah to the tobacco company for putting their foot down. The free market might not be so free anymore, but it ain't yet deader than a door nail either.
 
Last edited:

Uma

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 4, 2010
5,991
9,998
Calif
If you read the reports, any decent journalist would make the headlines read: "TCI & WHO take complete advantage of addicted smokers, lobby for increased outrageous taxes in order to drive people into extreme poverty then blame the tobacco companies instead of their own evil murderous groups, so they have reason to raise the taxes even higher and higher."
Because, that my dear, is exactly what they do. They get rich off the backs of addiction. Drop those tobacco prices, everyone eats. Drop those prices, everyone pays taxes. Drop those prices and educate about the dangers, then many will decide to not smoke on their own.
I'm so sick and tired of the TCI I could scream.

Oh, and btw, please catch this catchy little tune in the nbc article.
"The proportion of smokers may have shrunk thanks to rising population, but the actual number of smokers jumped from 721 million in 1980 to 967 million in 2012, according to this study."
 

Anjaffm

Dragon Lady
ECF Veteran
Sep 12, 2013
2,468
8,639
Germany
I really hope we can do something about this..this greed and brutality should be stopped!!..I hope we manage to come up with ideas and suggestions.

I most certainly agree that something should be done to stop the greed and brutality of the Tobacco Control Industry.

Some reading on those people who make big fat salaries on doing nothing but spreading lies:
Rampant Antismoking Signifies Grave Danger

So finally, where do we go from here? I believe we go to war . We recognise quite clearly that this is a war with a determined enemy and with unsuspecting casualties . The tobacco industry has demonstrated in every continent that it has forfeited any right to be regarded as anything other than the opposition . Our enemy is not the smoker; indeed we know that most smokers want to give up smoking and get on to health . Our enemy is the manufacturer who exploits our youth and spreads this modern plague in the third world. Unless we act now there will indeed be something like a modern slaughter of the innocents ……..So let us end where we began : Prof. Hillerdal talked of smoking as the captain of the men of death . The merchants of death - and I assume that phrase was thought up by Sir George Godber because he thought up most of the good phrases we use - the merchants of death are the tobacco manufacturers and we must confront them with every battle field, whether it is health, political, social, environmental or economic or any other
4th World Conference on Smoking and Health, 1979, Stockholm, Sweden
“THE SMOKING EPIDEMIC, a matter of worldwide concern”


Looks like Tobacco Control has succeeded in demonizing the Tobacco Industry, eh?
Although Tobacco Control lives on tobacco smoking. No tobacco, no smoke, no big fat money and big fat jobs for Tobacco Control.

Oh, by the way, the Tobacco Control Industry is also rabidly opposed to vaping. Because vaping has thrown a spanner in their works of raking in big money for doing nothing but exerting big control and making up big lies. The Tobacco Control Industry wants you to "quit or die". You. Yes, you.
 
Last edited:

Tamer El-Meehy

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 30, 2014
3,632
16,115
Cairo, Egypt, Egypt
Interesting argument you put there...I will do more research on TCI..but meanwhile I wonder why isn't the US government or governments of advanced nations follow your logic: "Drop those tobacco prices, everyone eats. Drop those prices, everyone pays taxes. Drop those prices and educate about the dangers, then many will decide to not smoke on their own." Why does the pack of marlboros cost less than $3 dollars in Egypt, while it costs much more in New York or London?

On another note, does the fact that Uruguay banned E-Cigarettes suggest anything related to what we're discussing here? Several countries have similar bans, largely out of ignorance. Heck..you guys in the US are going through battle after battle educating your lawmakers about e-cigarettes. The EU misquoted Farsalino's research to justify a stupid policy. Should we take this to suggest anything at all with regards to what we're discussing here?
 

Uma

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 4, 2010
5,991
9,998
Calif
Interesting argument you put there...I will do more research on TCI..but meanwhile I wonder why isn't the US government or governments of advanced nations follow your logic: "Drop those tobacco prices, everyone eats. Drop those prices, everyone pays taxes. Drop those prices and educate about the dangers, then many will decide to not smoke on their own." Why does the pack of marlboros cost less than $3 dollars in Egypt, while it costs much more in New York or London?

On another note, does the fact that Uruguay banned E-Cigarettes suggest anything related to what we're discussing here? Several countries have similar bans, largely out of ignorance. Heck..you guys in the US are going through battle after battle educating your lawmakers about e-cigarettes. The EU misquoted Farsalino's research to justify a stupid policy. Should we take this to suggest anything at all with regards to what we're discussing here?
Cost of living in Egypt.
Cost of Living in Egypt. Prices in Egypt. Updated Jul 2014
The avg Joe makes less than the avg city apt.
The supposed "avg" wages is derived from including the posh earners with the lowest earners and equaling a middle. Real life average people that the TCI ...... on are the housekeeper income to the mechanics. The TCI is taking full advantage of their status and addiction. Lower the smoke prices, which lowers stress, which lowers smoking, and bingo, we have a parent who can feed a kid now and then without the gov help. Three bucks a day, or 6 bucks a day, if both parents smoke, doesn't leave much to live on. They became addicted at 25 cents a pack and now pay 3 bucks per pack due to TCI greed, yet the TCI, media, avg snob blames the hard working tax payer for not having money in their wallet. This thoroughly disgusts me.

Uruguay?
Cost of Living in Uruguay. Prices in Uruguay. Updated Jul 2014
Housing 13
Wages 19
Same story as everywhere. Taxed, fined, licensed to death.

Banning the eCigs assured tobacco sales.
They don't want people to quit. They want to stress them into smoking more so they can keep collecting their "sin" taxes or whatever they have going on there.

Healthy people have less stress, are happy, self sufficient, welcome citizens. The TCI and all their glorified "health experts" achieve opposite goals.

Yes, the EU is the devils advocate.

Why don't they follow the logic? Because it works. Education was working. Thousands of people chose to quit on their own. Others slowed down. Then the TCI demanded "light" cigarettes, and taxes, and those who switched to light cigarettes with supposed less tar, ended up smoking more. Paying more. Then eCigs were born and thousands switched over because they feel safer and they really do help smokers to not light up anymore, or for others, to slow way way down on their smoking. Today they (TCI) preach lessening the nicotine in smokes, because cigarette sales are way down due to the popularity of the eCigs. The "country" is going broke trying to pay back their tobacco bonds, while their sales dwindle. Their sin taxes, MSA funds, everything, has slowed to a whisper. This is why they fight eCigs so determinedly, to ban or to demean them them into the sin tax & MSA funding list. You know it's a sad sad day when supposed "health experts" (ALA, ACS, CDC, etc) do everything in their power to scare smokers away from switching over to safer alternatives, harm reduction products.

I am flustered. I apologize for being all over the map and out of focus. You have been a real dear, but the TCI makes my blood boil, which causes angry reactions from me. I'll leave the comments section for others to clarify and add to. You've brought up very important questions and they deserve to be answered with calm and precision.
Anja's book suggestion, readable online, is a major eye opener. I hope you get a chance to read it. There are more pages waiting in the wings, as well.
 
Last edited:

Tamer El-Meehy

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 30, 2014
3,632
16,115
Cairo, Egypt, Egypt
It's OK ..I understand the frustration and I can relate to that..trust me.

Banning e-cigs doesn't do anything to tobacco sales..I don't think it even made a dent yet!!..as the NBC article notes, tobacco sales are on the rise. This happens while e-cigarettes are spreading everywhere..but at this pace it will take 5-10 years to pose a threat to their profits and substantial spikes in investment levels in the e-cig industry. So far the industry is dominated by small to medium enterprises. ..it is clearly an industry in its infancy..and that's why reckless regulation can simply kill it. The situation is even more complex than meets the eye..an article posted on vaping.com the other day reported that big tobacco companies are investing in e-cigs. British American Tobacco owns Vype and Intellicig (ecopure eliquids), Philip Morris owns Greensmoke and Nicolites to give just a couple of examples (http://vaping.com/blog/tobacco-industry-and-ecig-flavors-the-truth).

The differences in prices of cigarettes between Cairo and New York is not simply owed to the cost of living. By the way the figures for the cost of living in Egypt that you posted a link to are waaaayyy inaccurate..not even close to reality in most cases. This is not surprising when you read towards the bottom of the page that "These data are based on 5513 entries in the past 18 months from 443 different contributors"..of course..English speaking contributors!!!..to be precise affluent English speaking contributors. More fundamentally, in Egypt where I'm from, the average Joe does not smoke foreign brands owned by the big tobacco companies..the average Joe and the regular government employee smoke Egyptian cigarettes..The C & D classes are not targeted by the big tobacco companies.

Anyway ..costs imposed by regulatory authorities are a major factor among several others (production costs, labor costs..etc.). Your government whether on the federal level or the city level charges comparatively very high taxes on cigarettes. The USG pioneered the smoking bans in public spaces and very quickly it spread all over the world. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't heard of a lawsuit by any of the tobacco companies against the federal government or New York city for instance, for imposing excessive taxes and over-regulating cigarettes, but they were quick to react in the case of a small developing country with a small and fragile economy just to make an example out of it, and because 80% of the world's smokers live in developing countries.

The hypothesis that they don't want you to quit smoking so that they continue to collect the sin taxes disregards the other side of the equation..the Uruguayan government spends on treating the health effects of smoking more than three times the proceeds they get from the sin tax!!..economically it is a net loss!!! If Uruguay wanted to increase their revenues from sin tax as you call it, they could have simply increased the taxes on cigarettes.

I will definitely read the book Anja referred to..but there are important and complex questions that need careful thinking and deliberation before answering them. One of them has to do with the unequal development of smoking regulation across the globe..and why tobacco companies are so adamant about minimizing controls in the third world.

cheers

Tamer
 

Uma

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 4, 2010
5,991
9,998
Calif
Uruguay has many many problems and blaming the tobacco companies isn't solving anything.
Between acid rain, DDT, aerosol toxins, asbestos, its no wonder they have huge health care problems... Here's one list that shines light. Uruguay Environment - current issues - Geography

Educating not to smoke and why, in honest down to earth fashion, so the people respect the info & teachers both, will win the battle against smoking. Promoting safer alternatives, tobacco harm reduction products (THR) will win the battle.
Accepting free market and freedom of choice will alleviate tunnel vision and create a path towards creative solutions that will heal the country.

According to many, smokers have a shorter life span which saves money in the long run. Recouping is a word that comes to mind.
 

Anjaffm

Dragon Lady
ECF Veteran
Sep 12, 2013
2,468
8,639
Germany
tl;dr version:

For just who are the bad guys in this whole affair (hint: it is not the tobacco companies), please read this thread
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...bacco-control-9-july-2014-conversation-2.html

Read the silly fearmongering nonsense in the document linked in the 1st posting. Read that the writer values "unity in tobacco control" over the health of human beings. Read that the writer values hating the tobacco companies over helping human beings.

Realize that those human beings are us. That this health is ours.

Then scroll down to the comments (start reading when Clive Bates comments). - Clive Bates, Bill Godshall, Carl Phillips, Gilbert Ross. Four great advocates of Tobacco Harm Reduction. - Plus a number of very knowledgeable vapers.
Knowledge, links, proof, everything. Right there.

It takes some time to read it all. But reading this is paramount to understanding the truth about the Tobacco Control Industry. And to understanding that the tobacco companies are by no means the worst "bad guys" in this whole dirty business.
Reading those comments is - so to speak - a summary of our knowledge. Uma's and mine.



--------------------------
additions, explanations, by myself (caution, long ;) )

Banning the eCigs assured tobacco sales.
They don't want people to quit. They want to stress them into smoking more so they can keep collecting their "sin" taxes or whatever they have going on there.


Healthy people have less stress, are happy, self sufficient, welcome citizens. The TCI and all their glorified "health experts" achieve opposite goals.

Yes, the EU is the devils advocate.

Why don't they follow the logic? Because it works. Education was working. Thousands of people chose to quit on their own. Others slowed down. Then the TCI demanded "light" cigarettes, and taxes, and those who switched to light cigarettes with supposed less tar, ended up smoking more. Paying more. Then eCigs were born and thousands switched over because they feel safer and they really do help smokers to not light up anymore, or for others, to slow way way down on their smoking. Today they (TCI) preach lessening the nicotine in smokes, because cigarette sales are way down due to the popularity of the eCigs. The "country" is going broke trying to pay back their tobacco bonds, while their sales dwindle. Their sin taxes, MSA funds, everything, has slowed to a whisper. This is why they fight eCigs so determinedly, to ban or to demean them them into the sin tax & MSA funding list. You know it's a sad sad day when supposed "health experts" (ALA, ACS, CDC, etc) do everything in their power to scare smokers away from switching over to safer alternatives, harm reduction products.

I am flustered. I apologize for being all over the map and out of focus. You have been a real dear, but the TCI makes my blood boil, which causes angry reactions from me. I'll leave the comments section for others to clarify and add to. You've brought up very important questions and they deserve to be answered with calm and precision.
Anja's book suggestion, readable online, is a major eye opener. I hope you get a chance to read it. There are more pages waiting in the wings, as well.

That is the truth. The whole truth and nothing but the truth. Unfortunately.

And yes. We can back up every statement. Each and every one.
It does take a lot of reading, though, to acquire the same knowledge. It is eye-opening. But it is not pleasant. Especially when one realizes the extent of manure and misinformation that one has been fed, all this time.

Some comments for now (I can provide the links later, if you wish to see them).

0. "evil big tobacco"
In many countries, cigarette taxes make up for the biggest portion in the price of a package of cigarettes.

In Germany, a pack of cigs cost 5 Euro:
4 Euro go to the government in cigarette taxes
1 Euro goes to the dealer+distribution channel + tobacco companies.

Now, just who profits the most from every pack of cigarettes sold?
Now, just who is the most interested in having many packs of cigarettes sold?

And no, this cigarette tax money is not spent on medical treatment for smokers (or anybody else). This money goes into the general government coffers, to be spent as the government sees fit.


1. e-cigs have made a dent in tobacco sales. In Europe and in the US.

Every pack of cigarettes not sold in Germany means the loss of 4 Euro cigarette tax to the gov't. 1 Euro = 1.36 USD. Multiply that by approx. 2 million vapers who used to smoke 1 pack a day. That is 8 million Euro cigarette taxes not paid per day. In one year, that makes 2,920,000,000 Euro in taxes not paid.

In the US, many states are desperate..
They have issued tobacco bonds in the expectation of a completely unearned future windfall from MSA payments (tobacco industry has to give part of its earnings to the states).
Well, cigarette sales have decreased approx 7% now, and the expected future windfall will be smaller than expected.

(pls check the News subforum for my recently opened thread on Tobacco Bonds)

- - do you really think that any government takes kindly to that?

By the way, health cost spent on treating smoking related disease is much smaller than the income in cigarette taxes and the savings on having smokers die earlier (approx 8 years) and saving all the old-age pension and the very expensive medical treatment / care of very old people. Rolygate (ECF admin) wrote a great text on this, link upon request.


2.
You know it's a sad sad day when supposed "health experts" (ALA, ACS, CDC, etc) do everything in their power to scare smokers away from switching over to safer alternatives, harm reduction products.

Yes, they do. They are heavily influenced by /and receive funding by the Pharma Industry which makes a bundle selling "treatment" to sick smokers. You see, those very old people I mentioned above, they cost money for their care. (Alzheimer patients, Parkinson patients, being old and feeble in general). But smokers, aaaaah, they get their smoking-related diseases in middle age - heart disease, diabetes, lung ailments etc - and then receive lifelong "treatment" with expensive medications. Sold by Big Pharma. The sale of NRTs is petty cash compared to this gold mine. And now people are switching to healthier alternatives? Big Pharma is not happy. Not happy at all.

- And you do realize that all those "health" organizations make a living on the high incidence of sick people?
Yes, that thought is mind-boggling at first. But it is the truth.
Why do Cancer societies scream bloody murder against a product which does not cause cancer, but which replaces a product that can cause cancer? Why indeed?
Why does the CDC scream bloody murder against a product which does not cause non-communicable diseases, but which replaces a product that can cause non-communicable diseases? Why indeed?

The tobacco companies are most definitely not little holy saints.
But the true devils are so-called "public health" organizations and especially the Tobacco Control Industry. They feed on the smoking gravy train, they feed on money that consumers spend on cigarettes, they feed on money that they get from Big Pharma to do anything that will sell more pharma products.

The tobacco companies do it for profit.
The so-called "public health" organizations also do it for profit. But they SAY that they do it for the health of people. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Do start reading the rampant anti-smoking link please. It will open your eyes on many things. Many things that we used to take for granted. Because they were fed to us again and again. Tell a lie often enough, and people will believe it.

And if you would like the links to back up what Uma and I have said above, please let me know.
 
Last edited:

Stosh

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Oct 2, 2010
8,921
16,789
74
Nevada
Uruguay has a simple solution if they had the nerve to pull it off. Triple the taxes on cigarettes and use the money to subsidize the sale of e-cigarettes. They could require the e-cigarettes be sold anywhere combustible cigarettes are sold, with prominent advertising.

The problem would solve itself in no time, and the tobacco companies wouldn't have a leg to stand on. Complain about high taxes?? Yeah right like that will get you anywhere....:laugh:
 

Kent C

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 12, 2009
26,547
60,051
NW Ohio US
Uruguay has a simple solution if they had the nerve to pull it off. Triple the taxes on cigarettes and use the money to subsidize the sale of e-cigarettes. They could require the e-cigarettes be sold anywhere combustible cigarettes are sold, with prominent advertising.

The problem would solve itself in no time, and the tobacco companies wouldn't have a leg to stand on. Complain about high taxes?? Yeah right like that will get you anywhere....:laugh:

Check out their "Broad Front" alliance - answers some questions. Wondering if there's a Phillip Morris defense fund :laugh:
 

Bill Godshall

Executive Director<br/> Smokefree Pennsylvania
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2009
5,171
13,288
67
Although I've been campaigning to reduce cigarette smoking for 30 years (including banning smoking in workplaces, supporting lawsuits against cigarette companies by injured victims, increasing cigarette taxes, and requiring picture warnings on cigarette packs), I support PM's lawsuit against Uruguay's attempt to seize Philip Morris' Intellectual Property assets.
 

Kent C

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 12, 2009
26,547
60,051
NW Ohio US
Although I've been campaigning to reduce cigarette smoking for 30 years (including banning smoking in workplaces, supporting lawsuits against cigarette companies by injured victims, increasing cigarette taxes, and requiring picture warnings on cigarette packs), I support PM's lawsuit against Uruguay's attempt to seize Philip Morris' Intellectual Property assets.

I figured you might. But I may be the only one... :)
 

Uma

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 4, 2010
5,991
9,998
Calif
Bill, The taxes you supported were minimal, nothing like today's greed taxes. I remember you stating that a long time ago, & how you even felt a tinge of guilt when greed took over the board members.
Even I supported the first quarter per pack, to go towards helping cancer victims and stuff, but I refuse to support a dime more. I'd rather the consumer eat properly, pay for their own doctor visits, catch problems before they're issues, live a happy prosperous life. Causing poverty is just plain wrong no matter the "issue" at hand.
Raising taxes causes rebellion, contraband, stress, anger...
All the drop dead buttons that add yet another smoker to the count. Imagine that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread