Won't anyone think about the Uruguayan children (in this tiny liberal country)?
(...)
On another note, does the fact that Uruguay banned E-Cigarettes suggest anything related to what we're discussing here? Several countries have similar bans, largely out of ignorance. Heck..you guys in the US are going through battle after battle educating your lawmakers about e-cigarettes. The EU misquoted Farsalino's research to justify a stupid policy. Should we take this to suggest anything at all with regards to what we're discussing here?
The 130-page document linked below explains in detail why the American Cancer Society may be far more interested in accumulating cash than curing any disease. The ACS has close ties to the mammography industry, the cancer drug industry, and the pesticide industry
"The ACS ... [has] long continued to devote virtually exclusive priority to research on diagnosis and treatment of cancer, with indifference to prevention, other than faulty personal lifestyle, commonly known as 'blame the victim,' ... ".
<...>
Pharmafia
<...>
Same here! Love it!!I like your whole post Anja, but LOVE this word! (I'm stealing it, btw)
Uruguay has a simple solution if they had the nerve to pull it off. Triple the taxes on cigarettes and use the money to subsidize the sale of e-cigarettes. They could require the e-cigarettes be sold anywhere combustible cigarettes are sold, with prominent advertising.
The problem would solve itself in no time, and the tobacco companies wouldn't have a leg to stand on. Complain about high taxes?? Yeah right like that will get you anywhere....![]()
It's a glorious system, isn't it?
We have a major addiction problem. Let's eliminate it by education, regulation, and demonization.
Ok that didn't completely work, we still have lingering addicts. So let's take advantage of that.
Let's charge sky-high taxes on the demonized drug. We can justify it by reminding everyone that using the drug is a "sin," and remind people that it's their fault they still use it because they could quit if they tried hard enough.
Let's develop expensive treatments for the drug's effects, and make the user pay for them. Again, it's their own fault anyway.
Oh, there are new treatment options to help people quit by feeding the addiction a little? Let's charge sky-high prices for that too, and keep the dose low so it doesn't really work. We'll tell them if they really want to quit, they'll pay those high prices, and when it doesn't work, remind them that they just weren't trying hard enough and they could've quit if they put in a little more effort.
Finally, a new product comes on the market that feeds the addiction but doesn't have any of the drug's negative effects... but we're making so much money off of the drug now! Act fast! We need to put out a massive smear campaign to demonize this new product so we can justify to the public a set of suffocating regulations that will make this product disappear and protect all of our profits!
![]()
Absolutely! Excellent posting - and excellent summary of the situation - thank you very much![]()
Nobody saying it good to do. But, the bad has been so demonized, tunnel visioned suspected, junk science tested, incredibly taxed for PROFIT, that it's worth mentioning.Ever wondered why the latest spots don't show the (in)famous analog-puffing cowboy during daylight anymore ?
'Ain't done coughing till sunset, man...'