Well put, Vocalek. I'm not nearly as versed in this fight as many on here but I have enough experience in the mechanics of the regulatory process to know one thing for certain. One thing our Government does not do well or ever is go backwards. Especially since 9/11 and the econ crash. It's very troubling to me. It become accepted that our freedom and liberty can continuously be eroded but for some reason too many people are "ok" with it.
The Patriot Act is an American rights tragedy. It was never really intended to become permanent. Or was it? It was sold on the heels of a great American tragedy. It was an easy sell. And here we are 12 years later with many of the provisions still intact. I suppose if I had blind faith and trust in the Government using it solely for its intended purpose I would feel "ok" about it but I personally will never have that kind of faith and trust.
So here we are at a crossroads with
tobacco vs ecigs. It's a sad truth that the decision makers will likely view any and all proposed regulation on ecigs that is softer than
tobacco as going backwards. The really disturbing part is that the entire rise of ecigs is actually going forwards at breakneck speed compared to the last....i don't know....since the invention of the cigarette? Sheesh.
I'm in the large minority in my political beliefs but I honestly believe our Country would greatly benefit from a moderate libertarian President for at least one term. If we never go backwards with the erosion of the freedom and liberty that our Founding Fathers put in writing then each year that passes is as good as it gets and they are consecutively getting worse. Would a libertarian President have collateral damage? Absolutely. I'm willing to sacrifice some things to regain some
sense of what America was originally supposed to be.