I've shared my experience with human resources executives, insurance carriers, and their healthcare "professionals" with the [removed] process they use to classify individuals with a positive cotinine screen in past threads, but here are a few highlights:
To my benefit, they made this suggestion in front of seven other managers, the regional HR manager, and the president of the division at which I'm employed.
I'm not suggesting that everyone follow my lead, I'm simply stating that until the idiots that parrot junk science and studies paid for by companies that will lose ....-loads of cash if everyone stopped smoking, one never knows what will happen until one confronts the ignorance with actual facts.
The sad thing is, employees on the lower end of the pay scale simply waived the insurance coverage and only a handful got basic, minimal policies from the (un)Affordable Health Care program.
- None of them knew what a nightshade is or that nicotine was present in, or could be extracted from, anything except the tobacco plant.
- Even with documentation that scientifically demonstrated the similarities between nicotine and caffeine they thought my suggestion that they similarly penalizing coffee-drinkers was silly.
- They also thought it was silly charge higher premiums to employees with high-risk lifestyles and hobbies. i.e.: skydiving, base jumping, riding motorcycles or ATVs/snowmobiles on or off road with or without a helmet, excessive drinking, more than one DUI/DWI conviction, significantly overweight, etc.
- The CASAA material I gave them and reviewed with them caused confusion beyond belief.
- They could not grasp my argument that I would willingly pay whatever penalty they deemed necessary if they were to classify me as a nicotine user but I would not, under any circumstances, admit to or allow them to classify me as a smoker or pay any fees ($1,800 a year, minimum) they may charge an actual smoker.
- They also could not understand (or accept) that for people without mitigating health issues, nicotine could have a positive effect and enhance people quality of life.
"Why don't you just quit vaping or use zero nicotine long enough to pass the cotinine screen and then go back to using nicotine until next year's open enrollment?"
To my benefit, they made this suggestion in front of seven other managers, the regional HR manager, and the president of the division at which I'm employed.
I'm not suggesting that everyone follow my lead, I'm simply stating that until the idiots that parrot junk science and studies paid for by companies that will lose ....-loads of cash if everyone stopped smoking, one never knows what will happen until one confronts the ignorance with actual facts.
The sad thing is, employees on the lower end of the pay scale simply waived the insurance coverage and only a handful got basic, minimal policies from the (un)Affordable Health Care program.
Last edited by a moderator: