AW IMR vs BIO IMR

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rocketman

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
May 3, 2009
2,649
977
SouthEastern Louisiana
In terms of a box, you need a square 1:1 aspect for the 26650 which I don't particularly care for. Two parallel NCR18650As accomplish the same objective (able to drive a booster) while providing almost double the run time with a nice rectangular 2:1 aspect. It may be possible to use an ICR (LiCo) 26650. You'd get the same high capacity with the required drain capability and cell resistance, but that's still the less preferable 1:1 form. Though, I haven't seen a cell like that. I've only seen the 26650s in an IMR type, also LiFePO4.

A LiCo 26650 would be scary :)
Nice thing about a BIG mod is the recommended 50mmX4mm slots wouldn't look nearly as bad as they would on a mod using 16mm cells.


(parallel 18650s or an IMR 26650 both last me much longer than some of the 'smaller' mods)
 

buGG

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 10, 2009
1,486
227
brush²
...Nice thing about a BIG mod is the recommended 50mmX4mm slots wouldn't look nearly as bad as they would on a mod using 16mm cells.

:ohmy::ohmy::ohmy:
Is this latest recommendation literally supposed to be 50mm in length up the mod, or circumference, or circle area?

BTW, does anyone know yet whether the latest AW 18650 "imr" is the same as the panasonic nickel limn?
 

CraigHB

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 31, 2010
1,249
314
Reno, Nevada

Well, there you go then. However, I don't really understand why there's a disclaimer that says 4000mAh. A 26650 has almost exactly double the volume of an 18650 so the charge capacity should be double. It should be at least 5000mAh on the bench.

Hmmm... Callies Kustoms compared their new Panasonic IMR batteries with AW IMR. In my opinion, this short movie simply shows that AW IMR just can give more current and power, but they are not less safe

I saw that video before. Very interesting. I was surprised that neither cell caught on fire. They are safer than I thought. You can see the lower internal resistance of the AW IMR in the temperature readings. Also, the fact the AW cell caused the insulation on the wires to smoke and the Panasonic cell did not.
 

CraigHB

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 31, 2010
1,249
314
Reno, Nevada
You think that the PTC might have something to do with that?

Or do the IMR cells even have a PTC?

Good point actually, I didn't think about that before. If you look at the CGR18650CH data sheet, item #2 in the cross-section is the PTC device. That would account for the higher cell resistance (PTC devices have some resistance even when cold) and why the cell didn't get nearly as hot as the AW cell on the short test. The PTC probably kicked-in and dropped current quite a bit. I don't know if the AW cell has one or not, but I would guess it doesn't by how hot the wires got in the video. It takes quite a bit of current to get wires that thick that hot.
 

Rocketman

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
May 3, 2009
2,649
977
SouthEastern Louisiana
Just like everything else in the world bigger is going to be better - right? Bigger bang also... Why don't ya'll wait for the 52105 series and get 10,000mah - it will probably be out in a few months... You can take out one side of the house with this one...

or a pair of 38120 LiFePO4 3.2 volt cell in series for 6.4 volts loaded with about ANY atty made :)
10,000mah. and a pretty good C rating.
 

slimest

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 1, 2011
1,623
541
Russia, Moscow
ecigroom.myqip.ru
Well, there you go then.
I will not. You said that never met such a batteries, so I tried to help :)

However, I don't really understand why there's a disclaimer that says 4000mAh. A 26650 has almost exactly double the volume of an 18650 so the charge capacity should be double. It should be at least 5000mAh on the bench.
If you read forums about 18650 Trustfire batteries, you will see, that mostly real capacity of them sufficiently lower than declared. For 26650 from trustfire 4000 ma-h should be OK, honest statement. Particularly for big currents.
 

Rocketman

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
May 3, 2009
2,649
977
SouthEastern Louisiana
I will not. You said that never met such a batteries, so I tried to help :)

Slimest,
"Well, there you go then" is an "acknowledgment".

Craig is not telling you to leave.
At least I don't think so :)


If anyone gets one of these 26650 protected cells, I would be interested in seeing the protection board. I use the "2 mosfet" DX boards. But haven't seen a 26mm board yet.
Wonder what the current trip point is? Might be great for 26650 IMR cell.
 
Last edited:

slimest

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 1, 2011
1,623
541
Russia, Moscow
ecigroom.myqip.ru
Now I see. Thanks, Rocket!

On the DX forum guys just assume that these boards should be powerful enough, otherwise to sense tu use them.
For IMR's - I don't think so... IMR batteries don't like to be discharged less than 3.3-3.5 volts. These boards, I guess, have approx 2.5 volts threshold, too low for IMR's... Yesterday I asked about using eGo boards as a protection and switch board, but seems that my idea is utopic... It's a pity, these boards have 3.3V threshold :(
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...ego-battery-board-just-electronic-button.html
 

slimest

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 1, 2011
1,623
541
Russia, Moscow
ecigroom.myqip.ru
Last edited:

buGG

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 10, 2009
1,486
227
brush²
Good point actually, I didn't think about that before. If you look at the CGR18650CH data sheet, item #2 in the cross-section is the PTC device. That would account for the higher cell resistance (PTC devices have some resistance even when cold) and why the cell didn't get nearly as hot as the AW cell on the short test. The PTC probably kicked-in and dropped current quite a bit. I don't know if the AW cell has one or not, but I would guess it doesn't by how hot the wires got in the video. It takes quite a bit of current to get wires that thick that hot.

Definitely shows a PTC, and then in the notes below says "this battery is not equipped with a PTC." :oops:. Is this also supposed to be the 2000 mAh AW IMR18650? I keep seeing this battery at vaping sites, so the specs., if any, are all copy/ paste and not very helpful, but apparently they both have a 10A max. continuous discharge.
 

slimest

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 1, 2011
1,623
541
Russia, Moscow
ecigroom.myqip.ru
Last edited:

CraigHB

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 31, 2010
1,249
314
Reno, Nevada
Definitely shows a PTC, and then in the notes below says "this battery is not equipped with a PTC." :oops:.

Good catch, I would have never noticed that. They go on and on in about their safety technologies that include 3 different acronyms (look at their press releases) and then they put that note in there. Is Panasonic pulling a bait and switch here?

One other thought about the video showing the short test, I dont' know about the Panasonic cell, but I bet the AW cell would have burst into flames using a metal bar instead of a couple wires soldered to the cell contacts. I looked at the video again and noticed the comment about the wires being completey burnt after the test. So, circuit resistance went up greatly as the wires heated up. Shorting with a metal bar would maintain maximum current flow causing the cell itelf to dissipate all the heat. I'm sure the cell would have got flaming hot. A short like that is possible with an all mechanical metal mod.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread