thoughts or meditations?
Rants or ramblings?
Rants or ramblings?
Last edited:
Sometimes, even saying that God is in fact real, offends an atheist. I'm not even kidding.
I don't know about the PC part. That term implies some things that "we shouldn't talk about" or "have tolerance over".
People perish for lack of the knowledge.
But there are many ways in which comunication can take place from the downright offensive on one end, to the polite and compassionate on the other. Both of those ways can speak the Gospel, but I think one displays it better than the other.
We can't be silent and still fulfill the great commision. I have a feeling that when I'm truly humble, and at "a place" where I'm not able to be offended by words or actions, then I will be able to speak the truth without unnecessarily offending.
Some will be offended regardless becasue the Gospel is foolishness to those who are perishing, but we can make it worse than it needs to be if we are not careful and deliberate in our approach.
The flip side is that there are times when it is right to preach boldly which can offend. But far more Christian's than not use/claim righteous indignation as and excuse to be unrighteously angry and sometimes down right mean. Which isn't preaching Christ.
Very much agree with your thoughts. We as Christians have actually a dual citizenship. We are to be citizens of the kingdom of God and citizens of our country of which we are to obey the laws. The PC crowd screams that we should be more tolerant and accepting of things (that sometimes) the Bible itself condemns. Sometimes this "tolerance" or "acceptance" causes many of us to violate our consciences in the name sake of peace. It then becomes an issue of priority. Of which kingdom are we a citizen first? Which kingdom takes priority? The Bible says that we are to obey the laws of the land provided they do not conflict with the word of God.
The bible also says respect thy neighbor, and judge not lest ye be judged. Although it is difficult, if not impossible to obey all teachings of the bible simultaneously, I choose to believe that respecting the beliefs of others takes a priority for humans, and God himself will sort out those he deems sinful when they are dead, or in the case of Noah's ark, or Sodom and Gomorrah, God will see fit to sort it out before death.
We as Christians have actually a dual citizenship. We are to be citizens of the kingdom of God and citizens of our country of which we are to obey the laws. The PC crowd screams that we should be more tolerant and accepting of things (that sometimes) the Bible itself condemns. Sometimes this "tolerance" or "acceptance" causes many of us to violate our consciences in the name sake of peace. It then becomes an issue of priority. Of which kingdom are we a citizen first? Which kingdom takes priority? The Bible says that we are to obey the laws of the land provided they do not conflict with the word of God.
I agree that it is God who will sort the wheat from the chaff. The problem lies in the lack of PC correctness for the Christian. We are not advocating violence, judgment or anything of the sort. The Christian voice has been stifled in the name of PC. The word of God even spoken with love and compassion is construed as being judgmental and condemning.
Do you realize that there is a contingency who would have laws on the books to not allow preachers/pastors to preach/teach on certain Biblical topics? These will fall under the umbrella of "hate crimes".
The word of God even spoken with love and compassion is construed as being judgmental and condemning.