Status
Not open for further replies.

tceight

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 11, 2010
315
12
Ontario, Canada
Probably could. I guess the oil would coat the little particles and make them hydrophobic so they could not be wetted anymore.
Makes sense the fine particles would stay in the oil phase now that I think about it.
I think the reason is actually fairly "simple". It's dispersive adhesion due to van der Waals forces.... in other words, oil is sticky. I have a 1956 tractor, that has an oil bath air filter to clean the air that relies on this principle. The modern day version is K&N air filters.
 

slopes

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 19, 2009
616
210
London, UK
In reference to DVap's thoughtful post - any process that involved heating pressurised containers would worry me and I would probably avoid it. On the other hand, as a lay-person, I would feel fairly confident carefully handling liquids which I knew to pose similar dangers as household bleach or caustic oven cleaners. I wouldn't handle any such liquids without first reading, understanding - and following - the instructions supplied with them.

Having said that, I'm quite happy with the 'kitchen' method if it yields good results.
 
Last edited:

tceight

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 11, 2010
315
12
Ontario, Canada
The mystery ions are simply H3O(+) and OH(-) via 2H2O ---> H3O(+) + OH(-). If not for the auto-dissociation of water, pure water would be completely non-conductive.
and if that was the case, then by definition pure water would have no free H3O, and it's pH would not be 7 but > 14.
 

tceight

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 11, 2010
315
12
Ontario, Canada
In reference to DVap's thoughtful post - any process that involved heating pressurised containers would worry me and I would probably avoid it. On the other hand, as a lay-person, I would feel fairly confident carefully handling liquids which I knew to pose similar dangers as household bleach or caustic oven cleaners. I wouldn't handle any such liquids without first reading, understanding - and following - the instructions supplied with them.

Having said that, I'm quite happy with the 'kitchen' method if it yields good results.

Thing is slopes, without the training or experience, we are not equipped to even know what the potential hazards are, to be able to avoid them.
Where I work, one of the 'safety mantras' regarding hazards is "Identify, eliminate, control, protect, mitigate" in that order.
eliminate if possible, control energies if you can't, protect against them if you can't control them, and finally, reduce the consequences if an accident were to occur. All steps rely on the first "identify". If you can't do that, then you are lost. Common sense can only protect so far. That's why I find it invaluable to have those with practical experience tossing in their pearls of wisdom. I'd rather learn from others than make all those mistakes myself. I'd run out of body parts in a hurry. :)
 
Last edited:

tceight

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 11, 2010
315
12
Ontario, Canada
Stress is the silent killer in the modern world (cortisol etc), and a big part of why people smoke. And that stress-reducing quality of WTA is what makes it special.

I've forgotten the anchor point now; post anyway.
I'll take a stab at your point.... wta, and even smoking itself, could prove more healthy than living in a state of elevated stress. WTA reduces the negative health consequences associated with smoking and maintains the neuroprotective qualities.
oh, and I bet you wanted to include something about 'not relying on big pharma for your antidepressants.' ;-)
 
I'll take a stab at your point.... wta, and even smoking itself, could prove more healthy than living in a state of elevated stress. WTA reduces the negative health consequences associated with smoking and maintains the neuroprotective qualities.
oh, and I bet you wanted to include something about 'not relying on big pharma for your antidepressants.' ;-)

No fam of BP but this time was not on my mind. I wasn't at all thinking in terms of depresion (that's perhsp the 'beaten' state). But that modern life is stressful. And particularly for thse that 'care' about things (those with a heart, who can laugh and cry). For the more robotic, it's just routine (not much sense of humour). For myself I like to do everything well, not too fussed about perfection but get the essence right. For me I like the feeling of de-stressors. But depressed? - that's smething very different. Put another way, I'm quite hyper so my need is more for slowing down. Depression as I see it it like a stuck thought process; more often psychological in origin than psysiological; but one affects the other (downward spiral). Back to stress and people talk about good strees, the buzz, but it can get to overload sometimes.

Thinking more : Being depressed is itself a state of stress but not a normal one - its a stalled mind; whells spin round in place, go nowhere.

The point is that not all who smoke are depressed, stress is much wider than that.

A big part of wisdom i think is knowing where the 'good enough' line should be drawn - neither too high nor too low.

If one wants to change 'what is', focus on understanding 'what is' not on 'what should be'.

The key is 'clear sight' - in there lies enlightenment. It's just like science actually.

If one tries meditation - to empty one's mind to unstuck the mind - one will find that hard, and thoughts keep coming ... but the point is to watch those thoughts, don't try to control them them just watch and see the 'what is' of the mind ...
 
Last edited:

tceight

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 11, 2010
315
12
Ontario, Canada
No fam of BP but this time was not on my mind. I wasn't at all thinking in terms of depresion ...............................The point is that not all who smoke are depressed, stress is much wider than that.

I was just making a play on the idea that the beta-carbolines are MAOI's, and MAOI's are antidepressant... thereby opening the 'big pharma' door. lol
Your points are thoughtful though.
I often wonder if the 'damage' we are causing people by vilifying smoking... the stress and humiliation that is caused, the ostracisation, isn't overall far more damaging health wise than the benefits.
 

DVap

Nicotiana Alchemia
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 26, 2009
1,548
1,586
Wow...that is - without hesitation - one of the most succinct statements that I've heard from a safety standpoint. (I've watched and sat thru a 1/2 a lifetime of safety films/videos , procedures and training - (if any of you have seen the "Charlie" films:facepalm:, you'll know what I'm talking about.....)
Well Said! Great Job! Thank You!
Wherewolf

Thanks!

I figure if I took all the time I've spent on safety training, it would make 7 months solid of 8 hours/day, 5 days/week, and still it continues.

Did you see the video from the 80's where the goober salesman dumps his ashtray in the trash and starts it smoldering while the secretary freaks out? Classic.
 
I was just making a play on the idea that the beta-carbolines are MAOI's, and MAOI's are antidepressant... thereby opening the 'big pharma' door. lol
Your points are thoughtful though.
I often wonder if the 'damage' we are causing people by vilifying smoking... the stress and humiliation that is caused, the ostracisation, isn't overall far more damaging health wise than the benefits.

There is also the harm of sudden change. This is something one must listen to your body. Sudden change (such as sudden smoking cessation could well be more harmful than a gradual change.

As antidepressants, the AOIs are more often more like planks under a stuck wheel than the biochemical cure per se. The feel good factor might just get the thought processes unstuck. A bit like to solve a problem you sometimes best leave it for a while because otherwise you just keep thinking the same things. When what is really needed is a fresh angle, a questioning of assumptions etc.

~~~

BP is a business and it's god is profits. It is not a flock of compassionate angels ! There;s always going to be more money to be made from long term symptom relief (and side fffects) than in prevention or cure. Scientific progress sometimes leaks out of BP research, but is seldom the focus.
 
Last edited:

tceight

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 11, 2010
315
12
Ontario, Canada
Thanks!

I figure if I took all the time I've spent on safety training, it would make 7 months solid of 8 hours/day, 5 days/week, and still it continues.

Did you see the video from the 80's where the goober salesman dumps his ashtray in the trash and starts it smoldering while the secretary freaks out? Classic.

Best 'safety' video... ever. It's in German, forklift safety. (you don't have to speak German to enjoy it)
YouTube - German Fork Lift Safety

it's only another 20min to add to the list. ;)
 
Last edited:

tescela

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 28, 2009
536
5
And now the vape................ That's WTA!
Conclusion: Mineral Oil/Sodium Carbonate can pull 12 mg of alkaloids out of a gram of NAS tobacco... just like my more complicated procedure.

What is the implication of this? Is this "just" a question of the purity? If so, then is purity defined as "the amount of non-alkaloids present" or "the amount of contaminants introduced during the process" (or both...in which case, which is your primary concern) ??

The most dangerous aspect of my WTA extraction is avoided in Tceight's procedure, so I think we've reached the point where I can start to tell folks how to get the WTA's produced by Tceight's procedure purified. In order to achieve purification of tobacco alkaloids, we'll have to leave the kitchen chemistry behind, and start to deal with strong acids and bases (but at fairly dilute levels). A bit of equipment will be needed as well. The single greatest hazard here will be the fact that the alkaloids will be purified and isolated prior to mixing down into e-liquid. Stay tuned.

(See my comment above.)

It's nice also that we can begin setting a kind of benchmark. Most people would rather purchase WTA than make it, but the fact that it can be made means there's a limit to what peple would be willing to pay in terms of fair mark-up.

Interesting observation about a side-benefit. Seems analogous to the small subset of analog consumers that chose the RYO approach vs. the other 99% (swag) that paid a premium for convenience. I say "chose," because I'm under the impression that the cigarette companies lined the pockets of governments (the senior partners in the tobacco industry) to impose stunningly large tax increases on RYO tobacco.

"If at first you succeed, check your work."

This is a great quote. Its new to me, and I'm going to plagiarize. :)

By chemists I meant you and tceight ;)

I don't even remotely resemble that remark! I'm still in kindergarten with this stuff. :-S

Then you are getting an honorary degree, tceight. Why? Because what have the cigarette company chemists accomplished? Instead of funding R&D, the cigarette companies spend mind-blowing sums annually on attorneys and lobbying/bribing government officials.

So ....... the credentials. Results are everything. The people here are accomplishing more in their homes than the cigarette companies' best scientists. Despite the fact that this is their one chance to partially redeem themselves, the cigarette companies instead choose yet again to lean on governments to suppress the threat to their lethal partnership.

One aspect of safety that I've come back to on several occasions is the often heard, "I'll be safe!". The trouble is, being safe can sometimes involve knowledge and experience. More properly, "I'll be safe" too often simply means, "I'll be careful!". Careful and safe are not equivalent. One can be extremely careful, but a failure to appreciate a critical aspect or two can render one extremely unsafe.

This is a great piece of wisdom.

My take on the WTA has always been a bit different in that I'm not so focussed on the end product being technically WTA and only A, but on being able to get rid of the other stuff that is likely to gum up the atomiser (and ash on the heater coil). Boils down to a similar need purity in the end but I've never wanted to go the lab route and who would - we're not talking psychadellics or something people would go crazy for, just a better vape (there's always a perfectly legal option of smoking an analog afterall).

Now, it would be great if we could find a way to achieve a WTA that was pure and a match for any commercially produced equivalent. We may or may not be able to achieve that, but we can get close enough I think..

DVap has seemed obsessed with the perfect, but is perhaps coming to terms with the fact that people need a choice between the very good (i.e., a relatively-simple, safe-to-prepare homemade WTA) and the analogs they will otherwise consume.

Stress is the silent killer in the modern world (cortisol etc), and a big part of why people smoke. And that stress-reducing quality of WTA is what makes it special.

I've forgotten the anchor point now; post anyway.

I'll take a stab at your point.... wta, and even smoking itself, could prove more healthy than living in a state of elevated stress. WTA reduces the negative health consequences associated with smoking and maintains the neuroprotective qualities.
oh, and I bet you wanted to include something about 'not relying on big pharma for your antidepressants.' ;-)

Good guess, I'll bet, tceight.

To your point, no one is arguing that analog consumption is harmless, but have you thought about how the decline in smoking rates has been inversely correlated with the rate of a multitude of health issues?
 
I was just making a play on the idea that the beta-carbolines are MAOI's, and MAOI's are antidepressant... thereby opening the 'big pharma' door. lol
Your points are thoughtful though.
I often wonder if the 'damage' we are causing people by vilifying smoking... the stress and humiliation that is caused, the ostracisation, isn't overall far more damaging health wise than the benefits.

It is a mistaken self-congratulatory state - "smoking is the worst and i dont smoke. Don't matter I watch TV all day and snack on tans-fats, at least I don't smoke - that the real evil !!"

In this way, the anti-smoking 'message'; is harming non-smokers by inducing a false sense of complacency. Late night talk radio (never heard it) but here I come ! lol
 
Last edited:
Good guess, I'll bet, tceight.

To your point, no one is arguing that analog consumption is harmless, but have you thought about how the decline in smoking rates has been inversely correlated with the rate of a multitude of health issues?

Hey, that was my point !

I guess I part answer that in the next post (but before this one, iyswim)

Heart disease is, factor in time lapse, causally correlated well with trans-fats; and into the future likely with innappropriate statin use (will come out 20-30 years hence, though is known right now).
 
Last edited:
DVap has seemed obsessed with the perfect, but is perhaps coming to terms with the fact that people need a choice between the very good (i.e., a relatively-simple, safe-to-prepare homemade WTA) and the analogs they will otherwise consume.

Ah, but to strive for perfection is in many ways a good thing - we want to make this as good as we can, for the sake of a few more days or weeks.

Ultimately the fact that we general public can make it ourselves will spur the market to make it. And the better we can make it, the stronger is that spur.

I'm with you, but let's give the boffins a chance ;)

~~~

Undoubtedly, BT is ten sreps ahead
 
Last edited:

DVap

Nicotiana Alchemia
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 26, 2009
1,548
1,586
and if that was the case, then by definition pure water would have no free H3O, and it's pH would not be 7 but > 14.

Don't know about > 14... maybe it's just moot.

Using the negative log of the molar H+ concentration, -log(0) is undefined. There's no exponent for 10 that gives zero.

If we do the math on water's auto-dissociation, we have H+ and OH- both at 0.0000001M. Since water has a molecular weight of 18, a liter of pure water would have 1.8 micrograms of water dissociated. That's 1.8 nanoliters per liter. Try it this way... if you have a 100,000 gallon tank filled with pure water (roughly a cube of water 24 feet on each side), around 0.68 mL of that water will be dissociated. It's one of those things you have to really get silly with (like above) to put a "real" face to.
 

tescela

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 28, 2009
536
5
I often wonder if the 'damage' we are causing people by vilifying smoking... the stress and humiliation that is caused, the ostracisation, isn't overall far more damaging health wise than the benefits.

As antidepressants, the AOIs are more often more like planks under a stuck wheel than the biochemical cure per se. The feel good factor might just get the thought processes unstuck. A bit like to solve a problem you sometimes best leave it for a while because otherwise you just keep thinking the same things. When what is really needed is a fresh angle, a questioning of assumptions etc.

This seems self-evident. Who here hasn't gotten stuck on a challenge, stepped out for a smoke and come back with the solution?

BP is a business and it's god is profits. It is not a flock of compassionate angels ! There;s always going to be more money to be made from long term symptom relief (and side fffects) than in prevention or cure. Scientific progress sometimes leaks out of BP research, but is seldom the focus.

For more detail on BP and BT's operating philosophy, and the appropriate response, see:

YouTube - Nine Inch Nails - Head Like A Hole
 
This seems self-evident. Who here hasn't gotten stuck on a challenge, stepped out for a smoke and come back with the solution?



For more detail on BP and BT's operating philosophy, and the appropriate response, see:

YouTube - Nine Inch Nails - Head Like A Hole

I once while working in Belgium walked off into the woods (it was BIG site) for two hours and puffed away before returning with a solution. Just typing awat at the computer all day is not the answer. Most of my 'work' was done at home when i was free to think about things. IT stuff.

~~~

Sometimes its' worth stating the obvious ;)

~~~

If anyone reading here feels depressed, stop gong round and round the ring road ... take the exit to the countryside, go climb a mountain ... and if you can, vamp out there and lie on the ground watch the stars or the clouds go by ...

~~~

meant 'camp' out, but vamp seems to fit :)
wow, 4,000 bits of nonsense !
 
Last edited:
tescela; "The people here are accomplishing more in their homes than the cigarette companies' best scientists. Despite the fact that this is their one chance to partially redeem themselves, the cigarette companies instead choose yet again to lean on governments to suppress the threat to their lethal partnership."

I'm with you in spirit but I don't see it like quite like this - I think BT would like the chance to 'redeem themselves' but their hands are tied. I wrote on this a little while back so won't repeat here. In short, the anti brigade are the bigger impediemnt to progress than BT, that's my reading. BT could quite easily adapt, but they aren't allowed to.

For sure, BT knows 10x more about all this than we do.

It is absolutely in their (longer term) interests to go with vaping liquid production - if the milieu was right

Until someone in public health beaurcracy is bold enough to promote vaping as the safer alternative, we are stuck in a lose-lose situation. It's much like the dtate of depression I was commenting on earlier - its needs some bold move to break out.

BT might well be staving off the day, but will also be prepared for the day the tide turns. It's a business and it cncerns itslef with profits; no different from any other business.

If in the wings their WTA was not already awaiting launch, I would be totally stunned by the inconpetence.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread