Bla... Bla... Bla... Bla... Bla...
- Thread starter bcalvanese
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
Probably both...
With all respect, I have no issue with your Service to this country. I am proud of our service and those that stand to protect our rights.
I do have issue with a very few making judgements on what is right or wrong for us - In Their Opinion.
If your rant was to start a pissing contest on an otherwise average Saturday, so be it. I'm sure plenty will post to both ends.
If this is truly your Opinion, then I accept that and likewise I am entitled to mine.
Mindless herd mentality.
I actually saved a couple of bumper stickers I bought in the late '60's that countered a then currently popular herd bumper sticker. The message still applies - America, Change it or Lose It. It's pretty much lost imo.
I actually saved a couple of bumper stickers I bought in the late '60's that countered a then currently popular herd bumper sticker. The message still applies - America, Change it or Lose It. It's pretty much lost imo.
The OP, as a military man, stating the philosophy of if you don't like, then leave... Haha. At what point in time did everyone in this country agree on a single thing? How many times has this disagreement resulted in changes in laws/policies? Should the people that agreed with the status quo leave then after their belief turned against the policy or law after the change... Or should the ones in favor of the law after the change leave? In the military, do you agree with how every society lives its daily life? If you don't agree with the earth's peoples, then leave!!! (By your logic). Seriously, the argument of: if you don't like it then get out logic; is akin to we win so there Quite juvenile thinking, no?
Google "regulatory capture" and you'll see why the FDA has approved poison like Chantix, but is reluctant to approve e-cigs and other vaping supplies. This is really what we're up against.
The Wikipedia article on regulatory capture is here.
Here's an excellent pdf on regulatory capture as pertains to the FDA.
The Wikipedia article on regulatory capture is here.
Here's an excellent pdf on regulatory capture as pertains to the FDA.
Last edited:
FF (flea feces)! To the OP, I'll see your six years and raise you twenty (USAF, ret.).
I love my country! As for the pile-o-ticks and some entrenched government departmental leeches, not so much (if at all).
Rant on...
I love my country! As for the pile-o-ticks and some entrenched government departmental leeches, not so much (if at all).
Rant on...
Last edited:
Great read on point laying out what is wrong with the FDA and other 3 letter agencies.
Lets see how many "bla bla bla bla lba" responses I get from these questions...
Should the FDA allow this to go on with no science to back it up and expose the general public to it?
Hell no. I'm surprised they are being as lenient as they are.
Are e-cigarettes way safer than tobacco cigarettes?
Probably, but it has not been proven by the scientific comunity (yet).
Is it right that the FDA and society handle this with the same rules as smoking?
Hell yes. Until it is proven by science that it is safe.
If this was an anti smoking forum you would all be applauding my opinion.
Should the FDA allow this to go on with no science to back it up and expose the general public to it?
Hell no. I'm surprised they are being as lenient as they are.
Are e-cigarettes way safer than tobacco cigarettes?
Probably, but it has not been proven by the scientific comunity (yet).
Is it right that the FDA and society handle this with the same rules as smoking?
Hell yes. Until it is proven by science that it is safe.
If this was an anti smoking forum you would all be applauding my opinion.
Last edited:
I don't need the government to tell me what's safe and what isn't. Likewise I don't need them to decide if I'm willing to take the risk or not. It's my choice and mine alone. As long as my actions hurt no one other than myself, I should be free to do and consume what I choose. Period.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
Why do you bother asking questions when you consider the answers to be "bla bla bla bla bla" anyway?
I'm confused...
I think I might have at least a clue as to why. When I lived down in the DC Metro Area and had my own business, they were a client. But like a lot of entities depending on government funding, theirs was cut to the bone. So I am guessing (only) that if there was not $$ offered up (lots of it--tons of worker bees involved in each and every report they do), they wouldn't/couldn't pursue a study. And that $$ would likely have to come from outside, not from government.
But this isn't an anti smoking forum. It's a pro ecig forum. Which means you are only here to troll and piss people off. Therefore my time for you has expired.
*Matt Damon doing goodwill hunting accent in dogma*I seent dis kina a rent bufore from DA mornun staah!!
Some things are just common sense. No one has ever proved that water is safe to drink. Yet, for some reason there are no cries to prove it's safe before we use it. I wonder why?
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
