Around page 20 is where it starts getting real interesting and starts talking about things like "Research has shown that flavored product use is higher among 18-to-24-year-olds than 25-to-34-year-olds, and that sugar preference is 20 strongest among youth and young adults and declines with age (id.). Such findings indicate that flavored product use may influence tobacco-use patterns in young adulthood, a critical period when lifelong patterns of tobacco use are often established (Ref. 17 citing Ref. 18). See section V.A for further discussion regarding the impact of nicotine on youth and young adults."
It then goes on to ask for supporting evidence to validate the good points of vaping and such so it can see if they need to consider "deeming" the information.(pg 24- ?) In other words we do the work for them by giving the data, they review it, they deem if it's worthy and make a ruling based on that and the resources given. It then goes on into more areas of them "Deeming" things and making things safer for the public by using said information to either appease the public of it's misinformation or supporting it under the guise of making the public safe.
It then goes on to ask for supporting evidence to validate the good points of vaping and such so it can see if they need to consider "deeming" the information.(pg 24- ?) In other words we do the work for them by giving the data, they review it, they deem if it's worthy and make a ruling based on that and the resources given. It then goes on into more areas of them "Deeming" things and making things safer for the public by using said information to either appease the public of it's misinformation or supporting it under the guise of making the public safe.
