Changed order mod idea: atomiser, juice, battery

Status
Not open for further replies.

kinabaloo

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Because the present design passes hot vapour in the opposite direction to the liquid flow, and in the same space, there are two detrimental effects: first that the air flow 'fights' the liquid flow and dries it, second this longish path causes some recondensation of the vapour inside the e-device.

So i propose taking off the cartridge and reversing the atomiser. The mouthpiece is now the atomiser (with a short plastic tip attached). The liquid feed end of the atomiser is now on the other side. So the cartridge holder will be next with the battery last as usual. A small problem will be getting the positive power line past the cartridge (though the space the cartridge leaves for air flow could be used for a wire).

I guess this is both a mod idea and a proposal for new designs of vaporiser. I know that changing cartridge would be a bit more hassle but the prospects for improved performance would seem good.
 

kinabaloo

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
ceo - indeed, the small current cart capacity is another drawback. I am not sure if there is a good reason why the juice container doesnt extend further towards the air inlet hole - looks like it could be 5mm longer easily.

Elsewhere I have suggested a piezoelectric transducer to send a mist to the heater element, and this would certainly work much better if 'on the other side' of the atomiser. A simple push nozzle as found on an inhaler would also work, perhaps better (certainly simpler) in which case a 'super button' that pressed both the electrical switch and fluid nozzle spray could be utilised.
 

macpanda

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 20, 2009
96
0
41
Geneva, IL
www.macpanda.com
i have been thinking of a idea that would put the battery by the mouth, the atomizer in the middle and the juice at the very end. and a LED light on the barrel or around the barrel.

the Battery would never flood and a cart could be made to be filled on both sides. though i would imagine the atomizer would have to be slightly changed.

I was also considering this for a pipe mod. putting the atomizer in the pipe and the battery in the mouth part. allowing a larger atomizer and easy dripping.
 

mogur

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 24, 2009
192
9
Whidbey Island, WA
Because the present design passes hot vapour in the opposite direction to the liquid flow, and in the same space, there are two detrimental effects: first that the air flow 'fights' the liquid flow and dries it, second this longish path causes some recondensation of the vapour inside the e-device.

So i propose taking off the cartridge and reversing the atomiser. The mouthpiece is now the atomiser (with a short plastic tip attached). The liquid feed end of the atomiser is now on the other side. So the cartridge holder will be next with the battery last as usual. A small problem will be getting the positive power line past the cartridge (though the space the cartridge leaves for air flow could be used for a wire).

I guess this is both a mod idea and a proposal for new designs of vaporiser. I know that changing cartridge would be a bit more hassle but the prospects for improved performance would seem good.

Always love your ideas, kina my friend. Is this anything like what you had in mind?
wildhair.png



Now, where'd you hide that piezo fogger, kina?
 

kinabaloo

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
It shouldn't be difficult to arange the poistve power line without pylons - lol.

I like the idea of using a piezo to get juice to the heater coil. It could be finely tuned in terms of flow rate and be activated concurrently with the heater coil. However a simple drip when needed would be simplest; perhpas by a simple squeezy bottle or push pump as you have suggested.

A big advantage here, particularly of the piezo version, is that the juice is much more sealed and so far less likely to cause leakage of juice into mouth.

ps: you are a real daemon with the CAD illustrator!
 

q258

Full Member
Apr 24, 2009
35
0
So i propose taking off the cartridge and reversing the atomiser.

Yes sir... Got a prototype almost done using this exact concept, inspired by a simple old Zippo. Zippo wick has a copper wire in it that transfers heat into the batting and helps vaporize and draw fluid to the flame. The whole thing is of course, as you pointed out, more efficient by reversing the location and utilizing the airflow created from drawing on the device.

Another prototype I've got working uses a venturi tube and a carburator jet-type device plus a *float bowl* `ish type container to hold liquid. The jet atomizes the liquid and passes it through a home-spun 40guage NiCr (80/20) screen that is heated from an electrical source.
 
Yes sir... Got a prototype almost done using this exact concept, inspired by a simple old Zippo. Zippo wick has a copper wire in it that transfers heat into the batting and helps vaporize and draw fluid to the flame. The whole thing is of course, as you pointed out, more efficient by reversing the location and utilizing the airflow created from drawing on the device.

Another prototype I've got working uses a venturi tube and a carburator jet-type device plus a *float bowl* `ish type container to hold liquid. The jet atomizes the liquid and passes it through a home-spun 40guage NiCr (80/20) screen that is heated from an electrical source.

Some exciting work here :)

I have not had much time free recently but did some investigating of mosfets today and have come up with something interesting; but more on that later ...

In brief, I've come up with a switchless design - autmatic bit not air pressure or noise; just pick it up and vape, no switch to push or contacts to touch ...

Quite fascinated by the bubble jet concept recently; and using valves in various ways ...

Boldness and perseverance will get results (occasionally) :)

Happy to hear about your endaevours ...
 
Last edited:

q258

Full Member
Apr 24, 2009
35
0
I have not had much time free recently but did some investigating of mosfets today and have come up with something interesting; but more on that later ...

Can't wait to hear, I think I know where your going with it, I've been pondering similar concepts but thinking about capacitors and transistors - mosfet def. more creative... :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread