Re-reading your post today reminded me of when I came back to the church, as a Believer. In the beginning I sat thru sermons thinking the same about addressing current events and feeling that I should be able to ask questions also, lol. After awhile I learned that simply following the Lord gets me thru everyday events. They don't need to be specifically addressed. Focus.On.The.Light. Like walking with a flashlight thru the countryside- you look where the beam is.Church has become a hard thing to attend lately. I am subsisting as well as I can with podcasts from Washington cathedral. I attempted to listen to a radio show but it was not even remotely about community. It was entirely about right to life stuff and what would happen after the virus. No attempt to minister or deal with the current situation at all. I turned it off after about 30 sec.
Point of light irony:
the play button in the middle of the image makes the word read “..orshi..”.
Looked at the list. It’s all hardcore evangelical stuff. So much stuff that is far far worse than what was happening with that radio show comes from that direction. I don’t consider it safe to open myself to it.
Looked at the list. It’s all hardcore evangelical stuff. So much stuff that is far far worse than what was happening with that radio show comes from that direction. I don’t consider it safe to open myself to it.
Im sticking with Sermons - Washington National Cathedral
it’s not as exciting and the show isn’t dynamic but the chances of me being abused is much much lower.
I’m not smart enough to understand what the lord actually says. I don’t think there are any humans alive that are. Hear it maybe, but understand it? I am doubtful. I’m afraid I’ll be convinced to get it wrong. One of the problems is I can’t necessarily tell the difference between the lord telling me something and something else telling me something. I have to be very wary, and even then I fail in both directions.
There are a couple red flags for me in evangelism that worry me enough that I can’t trust it.
One is evangelism itself.
The entire concept of evangelism not being specifically forbidden rests on some extremely narrow definitions of terms. Evangelism is so very very close to something that is very specifically warned against in The Bible that I worry even getting as close as evangelism gets is way too close. At least for me. Another is speaking in tongues. I’m not against speaking in tongues. It’s a fine ritual, much like communion. The problem is the people who believe it’s magic. (This applies equally to communion) Speaking in tongues is not magic and neither is communion. What creeps me out about the whole thing is the behavior surrounding the DSM and hypnotism in the 1960’s. Hypnotism as a concept is not in the DSM. Not because the researchers didn’t think it belonged there but because evangelicals threatened to prevent the entire thing from being used as a medical text if it contained it. Effectively condemning at the time nearly 100,000 and by now millions, to death. Smacks too hard of evil for me. I don’t have that kind of strength.
For ME not to have faith or not believe in G-d. I would have to reject the evidence G-d supplied for me. Most if not all came through prayer. I asked and G-d supplied. Since that day some 30 years ago when I asked for - what was supplied through G-d's forgiving nature and I spoke in tongues not knowing and never heard of it only to find out months later what it was. Gave evidence of a Spirit realm which I never knew existed. That was a very small thing in the physical world where most people would even say I was nuts. But from that one little thing my faith and belief has grown.That is one complication and a major issue with the concept of faith and belief.
I have faith in god. I choose to act as if god exists. But part of the concept of faith is to do so without evidence. Not because not doing so is clearly asinine, (the whole I’m as god-fearing as the next man concept) but because it’s actually a good idea.
Do I KNOW that god exists? No. I HOPE he does. Kind of a lot actually. Desperately perhaps. I think if he doesn’t we are all doomed. We are not particularly smart creatures. Smarter than other creatures perhaps, but still not smart enough or long lived enough to keep from destroying ourselves and everything else.
Do I know it for a fact though? No. I chose to believe. I chose to have faith in god. I choose to hope for the existence of god. That’s all I got though.
After being shot at four times from a distance of less then 8 feet and being hit only once and that one entered my left forearm traveled around the bone and went out the other side, went to hospital in and out in less then 15 min with a bandage wrap only. Also a fifth shot from a distance around 15-20 feet that wiz by my head. SO YES I'M A BELIEVER.
How can I doubt, when I can always look back and see God every second of everyday all the time...
G-d's existence is not dependent on MY faith.god does not supply evidence of his existence. It makes faith pointless. If there is evidence it is not faith.
G-d's existence is not dependent on MY faith.
Evidence is all around us whether we reject it or not is up to us. As far as personal evidence goes that is in the proof that what G-d promises an individual comes to past and we can either reject or acknowledge it as personal evidence. All this has to do with free will. Why the evidence would be rejected I'll leave that up to you.
I do not believe its my definition if the Scripture is the instruction book that does the defining.definiion of terms. What you describe is the existence of the world. This is why many scientists are theists, despite what many claim. The way the world works is not magic. I am talking about magic. So I actually believe then, according to your definition but I use different terms. The use of these different terms means I do not automatically have to believe anything handed to me by man.