Classified New Rules Feedback.

Status
Not open for further replies.

cags

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 27, 2011
3,908
4,401
east TN
All you have to do is show that it is a one run, or not being produced item. .........

from reading the report form it seemed to me that the burden of proof lay with the person reporting the post. and I got the impression that the person doing the reporting better be sure, so it seems ecf is also trying to protect the seller from false reports.......

no matter what the mods do or don't do, there will be mad people and happy people. :facepalm:
 

AmericanPirate

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 1, 2012
103
64
New Mexico
if they are never up due to limited runs i'm sure empire mods would fall in this category then

''With that said there are provisions for special cases of collectable items and one offs, as well for items that are no longer in production.''


Yes very true but provisions for special cases never last because of peoples willingness to exploit them. In these case you need firm rules set before on what these special cases include. Otherwise these rules have a tendency to being removed after a short time.
 

AmericanPirate

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 1, 2012
103
64
New Mexico
from reading the report form it seemed to me that the burden of proof lay with the person reporting the post. and I got the impression that the person doing the reporting better be sure, so it seems ecf is also trying to protect the seller from false reports.......

no matter what the mods do or don't do, there will be mad people and happy people. :facepalm:

Yes there will always be people either mad they they are not going to pay those high prices or people mad because that that can't sell their stuff for what they feel its worth. But like I said the market will easily dictate how much a item is worth. Its simple Do they sell at that price then they are worth that price. It is out job as consumers to not pay more then we are willing to and to encourage others not to either. But if we try to force the market the market has a tendency to simply go elsewhere.
 

denali_41

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 7, 2011
3,475
2,162
Over Der
personally i feel the new rules are a little too loose ,

there is an item i want to try,it is out of stock ,but plenty listed in the classys.Problem is they are used and the sellers want to recoup 100% of their original cost from buying it new ,,i don't feel i should pay their shipping,state sales tax etc etc.so i will wait till it is in stock
 

Devonmoonshire

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 22, 2011
6,750
7,969
San Diego, CA
personally i feel the new rules are a little too loose ,

there is an item i want to try,it is out of stock ,but plenty listed in the classys.Problem is they are used and the sellers want to recoup 100% of their original cost from buying it new ,,i don't feel i should pay their shipping,state sales tax etc etc.so i will wait till it is in stock

Heck there is a lot of stuff I would like to try and I don't even mind giving the seller their original cost back, (Provided it is not a year old beat up hunk of junk), but I refuse to pay 100% of that and also double it because they themselves feel it is ....

"Rare"
"Collectible"
"So Danged Awesome it has it's Picture next to Awesome in the Dictionary"

Who Care's?? If it is that Great then why are you selling it.... To Make a Profit, that is why, to make twice as much as you paid so you can buy two next time and come back and sell those for twice as much and go back and buy 4 and so on and so on.

The problem is that I have seen this and I have also seen people selling things here that are registered suppliers on other forums. I refuse to put their names out in public because that is just rude but I know that they are and they know now that I do.

These are the kinds of things that this policy is trying to stop, not honest sellers who are just not wanting their item anymore or want to try something new but have to get rid of something first.

And everyone who says the "Burden of Proof lies with the person reporting the add" is absolutely correct. That form is no joke and it is a little bit of work to fill out. It is designed that way to avoid people constantly picking on people which is a good thing. If it was click and report then it would be a free for all. With this forms format you actually have to Prove that the person is over pricing their item.

There is also punitive measures for people who abuse it as well so I truly believe this is a very Fair policy on both sides.


Oh Yeah and the Percentage was raised to 20% yesterday so No One should be complaining because that is more than enough to cover any shipping from anywhere as well as taxes and STILL put money in your pocket.

Nate aka Darth Vapor
 

denali_41

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 7, 2011
3,475
2,162
Over Der
And everyone who says the "Burden of Proof lies with the person reporting the add" is absolutely correct. That form is no joke and it is a little bit of work to fill out. It is designed that way to avoid people constantly picking on people which is a good thing. If it was click and report then it would be a free for all. With this forms format you actually have to Prove that the person is over pricing their item.

it also eliminates people's opinion from the equation ,spite towards the seller and many other scenarios


But if i can be it new a lot cheaper?? why should i reimburse somebody else for a used item ??

heck,,see my avatar,i waited 7 months to get that new,i can and will wait to buy it new cheaper

10 bucks cheaper then new ? i'll still pass for the main reason i really don't know who i am buying a used item from or what they really did with it :( .there are a lot of freaks in the world and i am sure ecf has their fair share of them too
 

vsummer1

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 3, 2012
9,142
19,336
California
personally i feel the new rules are a little too loose ,

there is an item i want to try,it is out of stock ,but plenty listed in the classys.Problem is they are used and the sellers want to recoup 100% of their original cost from buying it new ,,i don't feel i should pay their shipping,state sales tax etc etc.so i will wait till it is in stock

I have not put up anything for sale, and may never do so. But, if I had an item I wanted to sell, and if it was hard to get I would sell it for my cost - the total cost . And guess what? I would charge you my cost for shipping it to you and any fees incurred for you to pay me for it as well. Yes, it is used but I will supply pictures and a description and it is up to you to decide if that item is worth it or not, and if I wanted to I might even tack on 10% just to make it worth my while to head to the post office and package it up for you.

I would not charge you my cost plus "whatever I felt it was worth." I have bought a few things knowing I could get my money back should I need to. I did not buy them to make a profit. But if I decide I don't need it anymore, and want to let someone else have a crack at it, then I may sell it in the future. I don't think it is a bad thing to let someone else choose whether to buy the item for my cost plus 10% for my trouble. And if it isn't perfect, or hard to get, I would price it accordingly and below cost if I needed to get rid of it. I think that is fair, and if you want to wait for it to come back in stock that is your prerogative. At least now you will know that anything on the classifieds has a fair price tag and I am not making my living off of you but merely making it worth my while to part with it.

And THAT is what the difference is between what the new rules state and what people were doing. They were buying them and then turning around and selling them strictly for profit. The registered sellers on here pay a fee for that privilege, and it is unfair to them to have "freelancers" running a business in the classifieds without paying a dime.
 

denali_41

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 7, 2011
3,475
2,162
Over Der
you can charge what ever you want for it,but if i don't feel the price is in line with its worth ?? i will not buy it

the new rules have not really stopped the profiteers in the classys.i am still seeing a lot of the same names popping up almost daily with new items .

supply and demand is not part of my lifestyle .

i have sold stuff in the classys,not one item\lot i ever sold was at or above new price,nor will it ever be,but that is just me
 

digunderground

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Jan 4, 2012
645
1,388
Vaparadise
I think there are a ton of good points coming up on this thread and it's awesome to see everyone discussing these options in a mature manner. I understand both sides of the coin, so here is my 2cents. The community (I'm guessing, as im semi new to the classifieds) has shown it can't regulate itself and is incapable of objective, respectful conversation like what is being conducted in this thread.

This means one of two things:
1) there shouldn't be any price cap, but then there shouldn't be infractions when users comment on seller pricing. This is the "market" communicating their disdain for inflationary pricing or profiteering. If you are trying to make a buck, some people wont like it. In the normal free market people comment that an item isn't worth the price all the time, no one gets .... hurt (I'm not running out to buy a chevy volt, or Microsoft Surface are you?).

2) there should be rules on both sides, a range considered profiteering and limitations on comments. This sets guidelines and I don't think that is asking too much from members (especially if we can't manage ourselves). In an ideal world we would regulate ourselves.

My major concerns in dealing on the forums ar the following:
1) New users that don't necessarily know what something costs. Some of this stuff is made by "a guy" on "a forum" and new users might not know how to even get it or the pricing. Some commercially available things aren't obvious as far as pricing or where to get it. The LAST thing I want to see happen is new people (trying to quit smoking or trying to find what works) that want to try things and get turned off by pricing, negative user banter etc. What makes it even worse is when a newbie buys something that retails for $100 on the forums for $150 and feels burned. I know the defense "he should have researched" and that is just sad.

2) People should be able to sell things above cost if they are "collector" items. Look, I have bought things WELL over retail, because that was the only way I was getting one and I wanted it.. I knew what I was getting into. But this shouldn't include hey, I bought 3 ZAPs and im going to sell them for $50 profit on each.. Not all of this can be considered "collector item" material. I think the current new rule does a great job of this, ZEN Titanium = Collector , ZAP = not.. for the most part, its easy... if its not ask someone, I've never had a MOD question left unanswered.

3) Users selling and trying to recoup as new costs. I don't have a problem paying retail.. I DO have a problem paying retail + their shipping costs + their tax + their PayPal fees + my shipping costs. This is used stuff, though (mostly) maintained well. There is a cost of doing business and companies figure this into their retail cost, If you want to do the same that makes you a retailer. If you bought something and you dont like it Return it.. if you can't return it then by all means sell it but dont expect to get an as new price... I mean your MOUTH was on it, rubbing on your clothes and god only knows what.. thats used.. If you dont agree I have an iPhone 1 for sale right now as a collectors item, it has character.. only $399 ;)

4) when non collector items are sold at a high cost, they have a tendency to continue that way. "I bought this on the forums, I want to recoup what I paid" I get upset every time I see this because I know someone got ripped off and someone else is about to. I dont know if there is a solution to this, but I feel over time this will subside.

I think we have a really amazing community here, I think we can all rise above this. I think we need to stop crying wolf on people that are being reasonable, just because we want it cheaper. Supply and demand will dictate... this is the old debate of; do we want more "government" or less of it. If we are going to regulate it heavily then it will become a burdon to the mods and less fun for everyone.

If you want to "make a point" don't post nasty comments, sell your stuff at cost or below and choose to sell to someone you know will do the same. Though I dont think its out of hand or offensive openly offering to buy an item for retail price in the thread, again that is a polite civil way of the "market" dictating costs. I acutally ask this in all my sales, "if you dont think im being fair let me know, ill fix it"

We all have to remember, this is a Privilege, a platform that is a service to us, that takes a lot of work to keep running smoothly. If we dont like whatever is determined as the set of rules by the MODS, we can all go figure out how to do it on our own. I for one will read the rules every time before I post, ask questions of a MOD if im unsure, and I will do what I feel is right for the person buying what im selling.

Sorry for the book
- DIg
 

denali_41

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 7, 2011
3,475
2,162
Over Der
10 bucks cheaper then new ? i'll still pass for the main reason i really don't know who i am buying a used item from or what they really did with it :( .there are a lot of freaks in the world and i am sure ecf has their fair share of them too

3) Users selling and trying to recoup as new costs. I don't have a problem paying retail.. I DO have a problem paying retail + their shipping costs + their tax + their PayPal fees + my shipping costs. This is used stuff, though (mostly) maintained well. There is a cost of doing business and companies figure this into their retail cost, If you want to do the same that makes you a retailer. If you bought something and you dont like it Return it.. if you can't return it then by all means sell it but dont expect to get an as new price... I mean your MOUTH was on it, rubbing on your clothes and god only knows what.. thats used..


how funny ....
 

j0ker

ECF Guru
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 24, 2009
10,558
5,557
MS Gulf Coast
Ok, I've added reference to the new rule and links into the Classified Rules. Thank you for bringing that to my attention, it completely slipped my mind!

One thing I've learned since becoming a staff member here, there is a wide variety of people on this forum and no matter what we do, there will always be some opposition. Something I've always know and realize even more so now, "You can make some people happy all the time, you can make all people happy some of the time, but you'll never make all people happy all the time" and this stands true in this situation as well.

So let me clear up a few things. The Classified section is "NOT FOR PROFIT", it's just that simple. So if you are selling anything on ECF Classifieds and making money, you are wrong. If you want to make a profit, start a business and register as a supplier or take it somewhere else. ECF isn't the only Classifieds on the Internet, so feel free to go somewhere else and overcharge people for your merchandise. Personally I think it's sad when someone goes and buys up extras of a product just so they can overcharge fellow members. As far as no longer produced and/or rare merchandise goes, I really have no opinion on these, I agree that the market will dictate it's value. Personally I would never buy those items because I just don't think they are worth any more than what they were when they were first purchased but like I said, that's my opinion and those items are exempt from the new rule.

In response to MAlzado
Kneejerk....heavy handed....meddling? I don't think so, kneejerk reactions do not take a year of discussions to workout. Heavy handed, nope, that would mean members accused of overcharging would be kicked from the Classifieds or banned from the forum or threads shut down without a plea, none of which happen. So where you get heavy handed from I don't know. Meddling, well that depends upon how you define meddling. The definition I found states "Interfere in or busy oneself unduly with something that is not one's concern.", so I'm assuming that you are saying that I am interfering with something that is not my concern? The Classifieds, not my concern? I really don't even know how to respond to this accusation!

It's comments like yours that test my ability to maintain my composure. My kneejerk reaction was to just remove your Verified Member status and help you not having to worry about Classified rules but since I don't do kneejerk reactions, you'll notice I did not follow through with my first thought.

So to sum all this up, the rule is to prevent members from taking advantage of other members and profiting in the Classifieds, which as most of you should know is a rule violation. We feel we have been very liberal in the rule, maybe you do not but posting insults will get you nowhere close to any changes. Post constructive thoughts and ideas and as most will tell you, I've very open to others ideas. That doesn't mean I will agree or implement the idea but it will definitely be considered and discussed.
 

Devonmoonshire

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 22, 2011
6,750
7,969
San Diego, CA
Dig Underground....... Book or no book. That was a very well thought out and appropriate response. Thank you very much because you put my thoughts perfectly into a very well spoken and thought out manor. No apologies needed for that.


J0ker, you and all of the other moderators on here do a bang up job of keeping us Hooligans in check when needed so something as tiny as not putting this new policy in the actual Classified rules is more than acceptable you got it there now and that is what counts.


I can attest to the fact that this has been a very long and thought out process because I have made mention of something of this nature as have a lot of people every since I first came on to this site.

I feel so much more at ease knowing that these kinds of things will no longer occur here, sure they might happen elswhere, but this is after all THE BIGGEST E-CIG Forum on the planet so it not happening here means that a Huge amount of people are getting a fair shot at things when they want to buy them and they are either not in stock or they just can't afford it new.

Thank you everyone for all of your input, Moderators and Members alike. We are all on this forum because we chose to make a change in our lives for the better. So lets help each other make that change as painless as possible.

Sincerely;
Nate aka Darth Vapor
 

AmericanPirate

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 1, 2012
103
64
New Mexico
First off thank you for your well thought out post. I am going to address a few things you said. This is of course my 2cents on the subject.

I think there are a ton of good points coming up on this thread and it's awesome to see everyone discussing these options in a mature manner. I understand both sides of the coin, so here is my 2cents. The community (I'm guessing, as im semi new to the classifieds) has shown it can't regulate itself and is incapable of objective, respectful conversation like what is being conducted in this thread.

I don't think the community has shown that it can regulate itself. For example if a product sell in the secondary market for $400 I might now think it's worth that much but if it keeps selling for that it is what the market says its worth.

This means one of two things:
1) there shouldn't be any price cap, but then there shouldn't be infractions when users comment on seller pricing. This is the "market" communicating their disdain for inflationary pricing or profiteering. If you are trying to make a buck, some people wont like it. In the normal free market people comment that an item isn't worth the price all the time, no one gets .... hurt (I'm not running out to buy a chevy volt, or Microsoft Surface are you?).

This I agree with you almost 100%.

2) there should be rules on both sides, a range considered profiteering and limitations on comments. This sets guidelines and I don't think that is asking too much from members (especially if we can't manage ourselves). In an ideal world we would regulate ourselves.

My major concerns in dealing on the forums ar the following:
1) New users that don't necessarily know what something costs. Some of this stuff is made by "a guy" on "a forum" and new users might not know how to even get it or the pricing. Some commercially available things aren't obvious as far as pricing or where to get it. The LAST thing I want to see happen is new people (trying to quit smoking or trying to find what works) that want to try things and get turned off by pricing, negative user banter etc. What makes it even worse is when a newbie buys something that retails for $100 on the forums for $150 and feels burned. I know the defense "he should have researched" and that is just sad.

What is sad is that more people don't know to do the research first. It is so easy to do it now a days. I don't buy anything with out doing research first. Yes it sucks to get burned but what we should is always help people when they ask a question. I won't tell you how many times I have seen some ask a question and not get a useful response. It would help if we could post that the price is to high when we see it. Then no one could complain about paying to much when everyone was saying its overpriced.

2) People should be able to sell things above cost if they are "collector" items. Look, I have bought things WELL over retail, because that was the only way I was getting one and I wanted it.. I knew what I was getting into. But this shouldn't include hey, I bought 3 ZAPs and im going to sell them for $50 profit on each.. Not all of this can be considered "collector item" material. I think the current new rule does a great job of this, ZEN Titanium = Collector , ZAP = not.. for the most part, its easy... if its not ask someone, I've never had a MOD question left unanswered.

The collectable aspect of any good is not dictated my how rare it is but by how much of a demand is on a rare good. For example and just example I'm not saying anything about the items if there are four Zen Titanium's made and 10,000 ZAPs but only 5 people want the titanium's but 30,000 want the Zap the collectability for the ZAP is higher then the Titanium. The market decides.

3) Users selling and trying to recoup as new costs. I don't have a problem paying retail.. I DO have a problem paying retail + their shipping costs + their tax + their PayPal fees + my shipping costs. This is used stuff, though (mostly) maintained well. There is a cost of doing business and companies figure this into their retail cost, If you want to do the same that makes you a retailer. If you bought something and you dont like it Return it.. if you can't return it then by all means sell it but dont expect to get an as new price... I mean your MOUTH was on it, rubbing on your clothes and god only knows what.. that's used.. If you don't agree I have an iPhone 1 for sale right now as a collectors item, it has character.. only $399 ;)

I guess my problem is I don't know what the problem of making a profit is. If I'm not artificially inflating. Example Telling the GG has gone under to increase the want of a Ody. What's wrong with what I'm doing. You might not like it but its not wrong. If I post something for $400 that I got for $100 you dont have to buy it.

4) when non collector items are sold at a high cost, they have a tendency to continue that way. "I bought this on the forums, I want to recoup what I paid" I get upset every time I see this because I know someone got ripped off and someone else is about to. I dont know if there is a solution to this, but I feel over time this will subside.

I have to disagree with this when a low end product is sold at a high price we feel bad for that person but we don't buy the item from them. I mean we don't see a flood of $100 ego batteries because the crappy mall kiosks are selling them at that.

I think we have a really amazing community here, I think we can all rise above this. I think we need to stop crying wolf on people that are being reasonable, just because we want it cheaper. Supply and demand will dictate... this is the old debate of; do we want more "government" or less of it. If we are going to regulate it heavily then it will become a burdon to the mods and less fun for everyone.

If you want to "make a point" don't post nasty comments, sell your stuff at cost or below and choose to sell to someone you know will do the same. Though I dont think its out of hand or offensive openly offering to buy an item for retail price in the thread, again that is a polite civil way of the "market" dictating costs. I acutally ask this in all my sales, "if you dont think im being fair let me know, ill fix it"

Agreed this is what I do.

We all have to remember, this is a Privilege, a platform that is a service to us, that takes a lot of work to keep running smoothly. If we dont like whatever is determined as the set of rules by the MODS, we can all go figure out how to do it on our own. I for one will read the rules every time before I post, ask questions of a MOD if im unsure, and I will do what I feel is right for the person buying what im selling.

The other thing we can do I have civil discussion about the issue. Like we are doing here.

Sorry for the book
- DIg

Once again I think what we should is let the market dictate the value of the products. And let the market a.k.a all of us ( just incase someone didn't get that who I'm talking about) voice in a civil fasion when we disagree with the price of something. That way the info will be there and the person can choose for themselves if the item is worth it.
 

AmericanPirate

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 1, 2012
103
64
New Mexico
So let me clear up a few things. The Classified section is "NOT FOR PROFIT", it's just that simple.

Ok. Where in the rules does it state that it is not for profit. I could not find it. If it did then the new rules wouldn't be needed. Even the 20% would be breaking that rule.
 

Underwhelmed

Account closed on request
ECF Veteran
May 22, 2012
6,071
1,260
Texas
So let me clear up a few things. The Classified section is "NOT FOR PROFIT", it's just that simple. So if you are selling anything on ECF Classifieds and making money, you are wrong. If you want to make a profit, start a business and register as a supplier or take it somewhere else. ECF isn't the only Classifieds on the Internet, so feel free to go somewhere else and overcharge people for your merchandise.

Really, this is all anyone discussing this needs to know and understand.

I've never sold anything in the classys, but I look, a lot. There are some things I want, and I've bought several things from people here.

I am also pretty active in the co-ops section when I have the free cash and it sickens me to see people listing stuff they bought in a co-op and never even used or intended to use for profit in the classys. To me this is despicable and makes you an un-registered supplier.

The people who organise the co-ops volunteer their time and energy to getting these thing for us at a good price and make no profit to do so.

ECF allows verified members to buy and sell and to participate in co-ops without charging a listing price or making a commission on these transactions, so I don't really see where anyone has any right to argue their policy decisions.

I also think that if enough people are interested in paying above market price for collectable products, perhaps someone should start an auction site just for these items.

Anyway, that's my .02.
 

digunderground

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Jan 4, 2012
645
1,388
Vaparadise
First off thank you for your well thought out post. I am going to address a few things you said. This is of course my 2cents on the subject.

Thanks -

I don't think the community has shown that it can regulate itself. For example if a product sell in the secondary market for $400 I might now think it's worth that much but if it keeps selling for that it is what the market says its worth.

That's Exactly what I said CANT regulate itself. I was directing that towards pricing and commentary.

What is sad is that more people don't know to do the research first. It is so easy to do it now a days. I don't buy anything with out doing research first. Yes it sucks to get burned but what we should is always help people when they ask a question. I won't tell you how many times I have seen some ask a question and not get a useful response. It would help if we could post that the price is to high when we see it. Then no one could complain about paying to much when everyone was saying its overpriced.

yes, it is easy for some people to find info, not everyone. This is exactly the excuse I was commenting on:
I know the defense "he should have researched" and that is just sad.
Its sad that we are taking the approach that "their loss" of information is "our gain". I believed (and still do) that this shouldnt be "buyer beware" mentality. Its our job as experienced people to set a good example and bring up new people in to this vaping world, to help them, and not to take advantage. I think the same thing about experienced vaper to experienced vaper, but then again at least we know better because we do research.

The collectable aspect of any good is not dictated my how rare it is but by how much of a demand is on a rare good. For example and just example I'm not saying anything about the items if there are four Zen Titanium's made and 10,000 ZAPs but only 5 people want the titanium's but 30,000 want the Zap the collectability for the ZAP is higher then the Titanium. The market decides.

You are confusing collectibility and supply/demand. Collectible generally denotes a value based on rarity and historical significance. Supply/demand is based on lowered production higher demand = less of it at a higher cost, typical with commodities. The problem with supply and demand on a secondary forum (not original retailer) is it prompts continued high prices on those forums.. "I bought it for 30% more, im selling for 30% more". Not to mention the negative impact it has on retailers.

I guess my problem is I don't know what the problem of making a profit is. If I'm not artificially inflating. Example Telling the GG has gone under to increase the want of a Ody. What's wrong with what I'm doing. You might not like it but its not wrong. If I post something for $400 that I got for $100 you dont have to buy it.

There is nothing wrong with profit.. if you want to be a retailer. If thats what you want register as a supplier, buy in bulk and sell. you'll even make more profit that way. I bought an Oddy on here for $225 when I didnt know any better.. I recently sold it in a package at $120 and still felt bad selling it at cost as I was the 2nd owner.. point being I WANTED to do the right thing.. because, well, its the right thing.

I have to disagree with this when a low end product is sold at a high price we feel bad for that person but we don't buy the item from them. I mean we don't see a flood of $100 ego batteries because the crappy mall kiosks are selling them at that.

You are right, we dont see a bunch of ego batteries for $100.. but we do see Pennys for $200 , Oddys for $200+, ZAPs for $220.. I dont think the boundry of "its quality" or "its sub par" can be used as a grey moral justification for profiteering.

Once again I think what we should is let the market dictate the value of the products. And let the market a.k.a all of us ( just incase someone didn't get that who I'm talking about) voice in a civil fasion when we disagree with the price of something. That way the info will be there and the person can choose for themselves if the item is worth it.

Nice in theory... but difficult in reality. I'm a idealist with realist goals, so maybe a solution:

Some of these FS/FT adds are already very long. Sometimes you have to read 3-4 pages just to find out what has been parted out from a package, what hasnt, whats pending and whats available. Maybe a great way to handle it is implement a simple thumbs up / thumbs down rating for price (and or seller, product etc). It could be in the listing the OP makes. There are simple plugins for all forum modules that allow thumbs up or down. users viewing the post would see " Price : $120 50 thumbs up (graphic) 10 thumbs down (graphic)". This would give the buyer a fast view of public opinion of pricing without cluttering the entire thread. A simple close and repost could clear the price rating.. or it auto resets on a price edit. I'm a developer and I know this is built into most thumbs up/down plugins.
 
Last edited:

MAlzado

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 30, 2011
231
136
39
USA
So if you are selling anything on ECF Classifieds and making money, you are wrong. If you want to make a profit, start a business and register as a supplier I think it's sad when someone goes and buys up extras of a product just so they can overcharge fellow members. As far as no longer produced and/or rare merchandise goes, I really have no opinion on these, I agree that the market will dictate it's value.

In response to MAlzado
Kneejerk....heavy handed....meddling? I don't think so, kneejerk reactions do not take a year of discussions to workout. Heavy handed, nope, that would mean members accused of overcharging would be kicked from the Classifieds or banned from the forum or threads shut down without a plea, none of which happen. So where you get heavy handed from I don't know. Meddling, well that depends upon how you define meddling. The definition I found states "Interfere in or busy oneself unduly with something that is not one's concern.", so I'm assuming that you are saying that I am interfering with something that is not my concern? The Classifieds, not my concern? I really don't even know how to respond to this accusation!

It's comments like yours that test my ability to maintain my composure. My kneejerk reaction was to just remove your Verified Member status and help you not having to worry about Classified rules but since I don't do kneejerk reactions, you'll notice I did not follow through with my first thought.
I'm a personal responsibility guy. If I didn't get the item for retail when it was available, it would be nice if I had the option to get 1 later even if it's for an additional cost. That word option is key here J0ker. The choice should be MINE whether I want to buy it or not. I don't need some nanny stepping in between me and a product I want because HE feels it's overpriced.

The freedom to decide should belong to the buyer. That's why they call it a free market system. The laws of supply and demand work quite well without any interference. I hold this sacred and fundamental economic truth to be so self evident that I I seriously question the motives of those trying to subvert it.

Which brings me to my final point. I noticed you've brought up profit sellers becoming a registered suppliers. Is that what this is all about? People selling collectors items at a profit and you're not getting your cut? Are they less of an evil profiteer and more of a businessman if they're paying ECF's fee? Is that what makes them acceptable? Is all profit evil? Juice has a 700 percent markup, yet you have no problem with that. In my opinion you're on a very slippery judgemental slope here.

I think all that noble talk about protecting the little guy boils down ECF management want some of that profit. And you know what? I agree with that 100 percent. These "profiteers"as you call them, should have to pay some sort of commission on the profit, similar to, but perhaps on a different scale than a retail seller. Or just stay out of it all together. In other words, if you're going to make it your business then make it a business. Not some ignoble self proclaimed, Robin Hood, Pander to the irresponsible whiners, Occupy ECF rule fest.

That is the free market system in action.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go buy some concert tickets for full market value because I didn't make it to Ticketmaster on time, responsibly to get em for msrp. I hope I can afford them. If not, next time I'll plan better.
 

AmericanPirate

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 1, 2012
103
64
New Mexico
Its sad that we are taking the approach that "their loss" of information is "our gain". I believed (and still do) that this shouldnt be "buyer beware" mentality. Its our job as experienced people to set a good example and bring up new people in to this vaping world, to help them, and not to take advantage. I think the same thing about experienced vaper to experienced vaper, but then again at least we know better because we do research.

I agree that taking there loss as our gain is crap. But its like buying a used car. If you pay to much I feel bad but its not my responsibility to make sure you don't. It your responsibility to ask before buying and then it becomes my job to help you out. I can't police all the kiosks in the world all the time telling people that they are getting ripped off and I can't make sure you know better if you don't ask. Ignorance is not a defense and the only way to prevent getting ripped off is to do some research.

You are confusing collectibility and supply/demand. Collectible generally denotes a value based on rarity and historical significance. Supply/demand is based on lowered production higher demand = less of it at a higher cost, typical with commodities. The problem with supply and demand on a secondary forum (not original retailer) is it prompts continued high prices on those forums.. "I bought it for 30% more, im selling for 30% more". Not to mention the negative impact it has on retailers.

I am not confusing the two but i will concede that how I stated it was not complete. Collectability is a side effect of supply and demand. When something is high demand and maintains that high demand after it can not be bought on the retail market it becomes collectable. But rarity of a item ,while it can be a large part of the equation, it in itself dose not dictate collectability.

You are right, we dont see a bunch of ego batteries for $100.. but we do see Pennys for $200 , Oddys for $200+, ZAPs for $220.. I dont think the boundry of "its quality" or "its sub par" can be used as a grey moral justification for profiteering.

Well this is a place where we get into convince vs. value. Someone is willing to pay more to have it now. vs. Waiting and getting it at a cheaper cost. This is very common in the secondary market everywhere. As an example for a short time in 2002 2003 in the UK you were able to sell your Mini Cooper for more then you bought it for because demand was so high and people were willing to pay more to have it now.

Nice in theory... but difficult in reality. I'm a idealist with realist goals, so maybe a solution:

Some of these FS/FT adds are already very long. Sometimes you have to read 3-4 pages just to find out what has been parted out from a package, what hasnt, whats pending and whats available. Maybe a great way to handle it is implement a simple thumbs up / thumbs down rating for price (and or seller, product etc). It could be in the listing the OP makes. There are simple plugins for all forum modules that allow thumbs up or down. users viewing the post would see " Price : $120 50 thumbs up (graphic) 10 thumbs down (graphic)". This would give the buyer a fast view of public opinion of pricing without cluttering the entire thread. A simple close and repost could clear the price rating.. or it auto resets on a price edit. I'm a developer and I know this is built into most thumbs up/down plugins.

I don't think its that difficult you just gave a great example of how it can be done. As a matter a fact I think your idea is just what we need. It's perfect. And I'm not being condescending what I'm saying is that I really mean it. I think you came up with a simple way to fix the problem.

I have really enjoyed this conversation thank you for that. I love having discussion where 2 people can disagree but do it civil.
 
Last edited:

spaky

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 29, 2009
5,463
1,078
Making cement boots
History should tell you guys that complainers are a thousand times more likely to cry than the content are to congratulate you for getting something right.

Going by this standard it seems that the new rules are what the memership wants since only a few people are complaining.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread