[CLOSED}

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chowderhead1972

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Feb 19, 2013
9,112
31,913
Clarksburg, Maryland, United States
Hey Tom, since the black Stumpys are a no, should I fill out a doc for a ss, I still want another? Or just tell you? Here or tell Chad at the other place, thank you?


Tapapaw[emoji252]
Fill out the doc. Be fast however this is the very last of the stumpys and I have 5 or fewer left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AllPepperS

snakedoc

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 26, 2014
193
343
New York
take-my-money-o.gif
I saw it... I currently don't have an answer. I won't know until I send the first 20 invoices. 1-25 be ready.
 
  • Like
Reactions: havok333

Chowderhead1972

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Feb 19, 2013
9,112
31,913
Clarksburg, Maryland, United States
Drifter received looks good , hopefully I will get some time to throw a build in it at work tonight. Thanks Tom

Sent from my SM-P607T using Tapatalk
If nothing else it will squonk well. That's a 1.7mm squonk hole with 2 1.5mm vents. Take it easy at first with the bottle smashing.
 

Chowderhead1972

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Feb 19, 2013
9,112
31,913
Clarksburg, Maryland, United States
How would you compare to 3.1? Better, worse, about the same?
It should leak slightly less with slightly better flavor due to the way the air hits the coils and the amount of space the afc and center post takes up which will yield a reduced chamber of sorts, much like the Narda.

To be honest I was never a huge fan of the 3.0 or the 3.1 it always seemed to be a cheap Stumpy imposter to me. The Stumpy was built on the same basic principal but squonked and drained way better due to the flush squonk hole and larger bore. The 2.1 was awesome but very hard to bottom feed. Some day I will buy a bunch of 2.1 clones and try some of the methods that I have learned since my first batch of 2.1s a few years ago.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread