I would like to see the outcome of said usage. Especially at the micrometer level to see the ceramic insulator and how that would affect coverage.I generally use a soft brass brush after dry burning.
Good, bad or irrelevant?
Tapatyped
I would like to see the outcome of said usage. Especially at the micrometer level to see the ceramic insulator and how that would affect coverage.I generally use a soft brass brush after dry burning.
Good, bad or irrelevant?
alien Traveler" data-source="post: 15982439" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">alien Traveler said:First - a fresh kanthal coil, never worked (not a coil, really). Mostly clean, but some contamination visible.
View attachment 464979
===================================================================================
Now - a coil that worked for 20 days, 3 times it was dry burned (last time - before going under microscope).
View attachment 464980
I was disappointed to see that picture.So much dirt... If contamination consists of carbohydrates and/or hydrocarbons it should be removed removed completely by dry burning (converting to CO2 and H2O). Not so here. Sure I wanted to know what was in this stuff. So I used X-ray analysis.
View attachment 464983
We got a good chunk of Periodic Table here after all organic stuff was burnt out: calcium, phosphorus, silicon, magnesium, and sodium. Cr and Fe - from wire. Gold and palladium - from special coating I applied to coil before placing in under microscope. We have a lot of interesting stuff in our juices... I am not a chemist or dietologist, so I'd better refrain from any comments about whether it is healthy or not.
Now, how it looks:
View attachment 464986
Looks like poorly sintered ceramic
=================================================================
Finally - about oxides on kanthal.
Spectrum or fresh wire:
View attachment 464991
And old wire:
View attachment 464992
These spectra show that aluminum oxide layer on new wire is thin and semitransparent for electrons, and oxide layer on old wire is much thicker.
The one question that this really raises is "Where is the silicon coming from"? It's not coming from the coil, it's extremely doubtful that it's coming from the e-liquid.
I would like to see the outcome of said usage. Especially at the micrometer level to see the ceramic insulator and how that would affect coverage.
Very cool. Thanks for doing this. I wish I could use the electron microscopy facilities at work for personal research, but that's not possible. I like my job and my paycheck.
ThanksLet me try and answer that for you, beck...
If you look at the first page, you'll see my comments on using a soft, fine wire, bronze bristle brush on coils, more specifically on "gunkified" coils... abused with solids, sweeteners, colorants - what have you.
I don't have images, but I do look at my coils from time to time with a 15X loupe... 'cause I'm one of those guys.
After a dry burn sufficient to turn most contaminants to an ashy, crust... a light brushing produces a coil surface that, at 15X, for lack of a better term, has a light orange peel finish... with no holes, pits, pockets or flaking.
Without magnification, it's just smooth, clean, silver to silver/blue, frosty metallic in appearance.
When I do see holes, pits, pockets or flaking... typically along with dark iron/chromium visible through the alumina layer... it's well past time to make a new coil.
Let me try and answer that for you, beck...
If you look at the first page, you'll see my comments on using a soft, fine wire, bronze bristle brush on coils, more specifically on "gunkified" coils... abused with solids, sweeteners, colorants - what have you.
I don't have images, but I do look at my coils from time to time with a 15X loupe... 'cause I'm one of those guys.
After a dry burn sufficient to turn most contaminants to an ashy, crust... a light brushing produces a coil surface that, at 15X, for lack of a better term, has a light orange peel finish... with no holes, pits, pockets or flaking.
Without magnification, it's just smooth, clean, silver to silver/blue, frosty metallic in appearance.
When I do see holes, pits, pockets or flaking... typically along with dark iron/chromium visible through the alumina layer... it's well past time to make a new coil.
More fun:
23 Objects Seen thru an Electron Microscope | iTILT
check first the "household dust" aka what is transported via the "fresh air" that Antz are so fond of.
And you don't want to know what's on your tongue.
This sounds like a very reasonable approach to coil management. Perfect for those guys.
Discoloration of a clean coil after dry burning almost certainly means the aluminum has been mostly consumed. And the coil surface is no longer "Kanthal-like". Time for a new coil, in my estimation, to be sure.
I generally use a soft brass brush after dry burning.
Good, bad or irrelevant?
Actually, it's quite possible that the silicon comes from the e=liquid:
http://www.emcochem.com/docs/Food__Flavors.pdf
See "anti caking" agents, in particular.
I wonder how many Liquid Flavorants have Anti Caking agents in them?
No idea, especially since these flavorings are not really formulated for mixing e-liquids. Probably best to just make your own extracts and use those. Lots more work and $$$ - most vendors just buy flavorings & mix 'em up. Even then, they're at the mercy of the ingredients in whatever they extract their flavors from.
It's still probably safer than eating at your favorite fast food restaurant.
I wonder how Many Flavorants used in e-Liquids start their Life in Powdered Form? Verses Liquid Form.
Not much use for an Anti Caking agent if the Flavorant was made in Liquid Form.
Yeah, I don't know. Point is, it took about five seconds to find additives containing silicon. They're also present in emulsifiers on that single suppliers list. Bet I can find more if I try ...