There are better places for this thread but I'm still under 5 posts.
I realize people freak out about GMOs, and the debate is still heated. But...
How hard would it be to isolate the gene in tobacco that produces nicotine and introduce it to bacteria? This has been done for pharmaceuticals in the past, why not nicotine? Synthetic nicotine made in a lab is cost prohibitive and requires nasty chemicals to make it, resulting in impurities. But GM bacteria could basically eat sugar and spit out pure nicotine. The problem with e-cigs (even though I love the things) is that they still use nicotine derived from tobacco. This results in very low levels of several carcinogens. These are measured in parts per billion, but the stuff is still there. Compared to analogs, I equate it to jumping off a cliff into a swimming pool rather than a glass of water. Nicotine is a poison (like caffeine), but doesn't cause cancer. Pure nicotine, no cancer.
Call me crazy, but I bet the political climate and 'common' knowledge of GMOs, smoking, cancer, and nicotine prohibits this breakthrough. I'm no expert on GM, but if they can make anti-freezing tomatoes and oranges, biodiesel producing bacteria and glow in the dark fish, I think they could manage nicotine. If some big pharmaceutical took this on, I bet they'd make way more back on returns. With e-cigs and safe(r) nicotine, I bet a lot more people would flock to vaping. Even non-smokers.
A vaccine is currently in the works to block receptors in the brain that cause the release of dopamine when nicotine attaches to them. So tell me, would you rather have them spending money on research for a mind altering injection or a safe alternative to tobacco?
I realize people freak out about GMOs, and the debate is still heated. But...
How hard would it be to isolate the gene in tobacco that produces nicotine and introduce it to bacteria? This has been done for pharmaceuticals in the past, why not nicotine? Synthetic nicotine made in a lab is cost prohibitive and requires nasty chemicals to make it, resulting in impurities. But GM bacteria could basically eat sugar and spit out pure nicotine. The problem with e-cigs (even though I love the things) is that they still use nicotine derived from tobacco. This results in very low levels of several carcinogens. These are measured in parts per billion, but the stuff is still there. Compared to analogs, I equate it to jumping off a cliff into a swimming pool rather than a glass of water. Nicotine is a poison (like caffeine), but doesn't cause cancer. Pure nicotine, no cancer.
Call me crazy, but I bet the political climate and 'common' knowledge of GMOs, smoking, cancer, and nicotine prohibits this breakthrough. I'm no expert on GM, but if they can make anti-freezing tomatoes and oranges, biodiesel producing bacteria and glow in the dark fish, I think they could manage nicotine. If some big pharmaceutical took this on, I bet they'd make way more back on returns. With e-cigs and safe(r) nicotine, I bet a lot more people would flock to vaping. Even non-smokers.
A vaccine is currently in the works to block receptors in the brain that cause the release of dopamine when nicotine attaches to them. So tell me, would you rather have them spending money on research for a mind altering injection or a safe alternative to tobacco?