Damn analogs!! Why so addictive?

Status
Not open for further replies.

booboo

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 11, 2009
477
10
51
San Diego, CA
booboo you just went to the top of my prayer list for healing. Hope that's OK with you. In fact, starting now, I will only vape for the next 24hrs. and give any amount of discomfort to be put toward your healing.

By any chance are you on blood pressure medicine? Some blood pressure medicine screws up the lungs. My mother, non-smoker, got emphasema from blood pressure medicine. When I had her meds switched out, after several months her breathing improved. Also, when she is anywhere near even a small quantity of mold she needs her inhailer about 10X more often.

So, check for mold anywhere where you live and/or work. If you take blood pressure meds check the med's homepage and/or pharmacy insert.

Wishing you the best. You already got some suffering here... just had to talk with my stressed out daughter on the phone... would have definitely had an analog had I not promised you 24hrs.

Wow, thanks! Don't want you to suffer on my account though!!!:shock:
But, no, our genes run to low blood pressure (imagine that?), and yes, I am defintely sensitive to mold--it's so hard to get rid of too! That's terrible about the medicine causing emphysema! Are her lungs permanently damaged? I smell a lawsuit!8-o
 

yvilla

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 18, 2008
2,063
575
Rochester, NY
But in the general hierarchy of things I blame my government the most for allowing people access to something so dangerous and addictive, then turning around and exploiting people’s addictions with taxation without representation

That could be a reason for banning eliquid.

I know Kate's post is from pages back, but I've just got to respond!

I don't think that follows logically at all - not unless cigarettes themselves were well and truly banned also, and not while there were still millions addicted to them. And on top of that, not when it's not the nicotine itself that is the truly dangerous element in smoking!
 
Last edited:

booboo

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 11, 2009
477
10
51
San Diego, CA
I know Kate's post is from pages back, but I've just got to respond!

I don't think that follows logically at all - not unless cigarettes themselves were well and truly banned also, and not while there were still millions addicted to them. And on top of that, not when it's not the nicotine itself that is the truly dangerous element in smoking!


It follows because they say we can't import this because it is bad and unregulated....then their buddies, PM and RJ come out with the same thing (only now it's regulated and tested;)), and voila, tax to all of us and screw China. :-x
 

yvilla

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 18, 2008
2,063
575
Rochester, NY
It follows because they say we can't import this because it is bad and unregulated....then their buddies, PM and RJ come out with the same thing (only now it's regulated and tested;)), and voila, tax to all of us and screw China. :-x

But I was talking about logic!

You're talking about something altogether different. :D
 

yvilla

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 18, 2008
2,063
575
Rochester, NY
I'm talking about the mindset Yvilla, not the law. If people want the government to protect them from harm the the government might protect them from harm whether they like it or not.

I take your point, Kate.

But still, I just cannot ever pass up the chance to point out how illogical such a governmental response would be, as I'm a firm believer in the harm reduction standpoint of it all.
 

Kate

Moved On
Jun 26, 2008
7,191
47
UK
That's because you are comparing vaping with smoking. If you assess vaping on it's own merits then it's not as likely to be as harmless as fresh air.

You can't assume vaping will be seen in relation to tobacco ... although to us addicts it should be because that's our alternative. To them it might just be a new independent addiction that will lead kids astray and threaten western civilisation. ;)
 

yvilla

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 18, 2008
2,063
575
Rochester, NY
That's because you are comparing vaping with smoking. If you assess vaping on it's own merits then it's not as likely to be as harmless as fresh air.

You can't assume vaping will be seen in relation to tobacco ... although to us addicts it should be because that's our alternative. To them it might just be a new independent addiction that will lead kids astray and threaten western civilisation. ;)

You are absolutely right. Curses. I am suffering from tunnel vision, it's true, and only viewing ecigs in relation to smoking cigarettes. In that regard, I'm sure I'm 100% right.

As to the other point of view, I'm afraid we really may have an uphill battle on our hands in keeping our access to ecigs secured.
 

taukimada

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 23, 2009
1,467
29
56
Tullahoma, Tn
www.youtube.com
i can see it now... it's the next Penelope Spheeris movie


The Decline of Western Civilization Part 4: The Vapers

where she follows and documents a bunch of homeless teenagers who have gotten themselves caught up in the evil lifestyle of vaping...

our movie starts with Sir Vapalot.. a 16 year old hardcore vaper hanging out in an abandoned house vaping till all hours of the morning while listening to classic rock... we then find little Carrie Mahecig... it's midnite and she's prostituting herself on the streetd for her next fix of ejuice... she's a poor hapless runaway who's mother forbid her to vape... and she's only a mere 14...

YES... this is meant for parody purposes.. but as your laughing at it.. realize.. the people against us actually THINK this way. they make uneducated GUESSES at who they THINK we are and state them as fact..

this is why it's VERY important that we do not try to push our vaping as anything other than what it IS.. and when we state what it CAN BE.. it is as important to make it known that we are stating OPINION at that time
 

MisterPuck

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 20, 2009
107
0
Oklahoma City, Ok. U.S.A
Vaping will definitely be portrayed as a gateway drug and a slippery slope.

There will be calls for government to protect the children.

We have no argument that we need it - there are plenty of approved NRTs.


Yeah, approved... like the patch that i smoked a pack a day wearing.
 

Walrus

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 3, 2009
2,244
15
Baton Rouge, LA
I think anyone who claims vaping as a 'gateway drug' or that there is a need to protect children from it are delusional, and simple economics debunks the claims.

Even with cigarettes costing $8 a pack, they are much more accessible than the $50-$150 initial outlay for a realistic initial e-cig experience. Even if kids at the mall look at Smoking Everywhere and go "ohhh cool!" How many of them can plunk out the $200 to give it a go? And how many would if they could? If kids are carrying that much cash around I think their parents should be a little more involved in the first place.

[edit] oooo I posted at 4:20 (not that I know the reference)
 

mrl

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 24, 2009
111
0
Wellington NZ
I love smoking and see vaping as an alternative, I think more countries are going to ban these things as time goes on despite the harm reduction argument. Drugs for recreational use = BAD is the attitude of goverments and advisors to them. Alcohol, coffee and cigarettes will increasingly be targeted. There is no such thing as freedom, there never was lol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread