DID WE WIN???????

Status
Not open for further replies.

DaveP

PV Master & Musician
ECF Veteran
May 22, 2010
16,733
42,646
Central GA
Good news: vaping lives another five years.

Bad news: All that gear in the Vapocalypse Stockpile just... well...

Good news: I get to raid the Vapocalypse Stockpile!

Me, too! I haven't counted my apocalypse stash because it's bad luck to count your vapes while they are sitting in the closet, loosely quoting Kenny Rogers. I've bought a lot on sale, but half of it is top notch gear at the time I bought it and the other stuff I picked up on sale at closeout prices.

I'm still looking for a few deals, but they need to be really good stuff at really good prices.
 
Last edited:

DaveP

PV Master & Musician
ECF Veteran
May 22, 2010
16,733
42,646
Central GA
This is a very pleasant surprise to me. I'm wondering if the rest of you were surprised?

Me, too. Trump's administration with all his Tweets and bragging seems to be able to keep some things quiet until they happen. Changing the Guard at the top of the FDA didn't hurt a bit. Looks like we have a friend in the White House and now in the top office at the FDA.

You could tell that the FDA was orginally siding with Big Tobacco because of the funding that comes though tobacco taxes and the Master Settlement. Trump's not a tobacco person, but maybe he sees that vaping is a stepping stone to quitting tobacco.

Time will tell. Let's hope they aren't planning on hanging high sin taxes on the Vaping World to offset the loss as tobacco wanes.
 
Last edited:

Eskie

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 6, 2016
16,087
77,744
NY
This is a very pleasant surprise to me. I'm wondering if the rest of you were surprised?

TBH, no. Go read Gottlieb's Senate confirmation hearing transcripts. He was clearly evasive about what position he would take on regulation on e cigs. Outside of supporting limiting access for underage users, he refused to state he wanted to heavily regulate and strangle vaping. This isn't new territory for him, and in the absence of resistance from his boss Secretary Price at HHS (who also has had comments voiced about ENDS as a way to decrease smoking rates) I expected him to announce something like this sooner or later.

What I was surprised by was the timing. He appears to have waited for that Jackson decision to come out first. He even managed to turn that decision into a benefit FOR vaping by stating the court clearly established his and the FDA's right to pursue regulation AND implement it as they saw fit for public health. He views the public's health as being improved by the availability of vaping to allow us to keep off of combustible tobacco products. I wonder how he would have handled this in the Plaintiffs had the decision in their favor. In a sense, this is a cleaner outcome than dealing with a Plaintiff win and come under political pressure to appeal. That would not have left him with a strong hand to push the comply by dates back by years, and by requiring more complete disclosure on just what reasonable applications needed to provide for approval. And he essentially stated those applications aren't required to demonstrate no risk, just reduced risk in comparison to cigarettes.
 

ChelsB

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 12, 2016
7,848
40,893
California
TBH, no. Go read Gottlieb's Senate confirmation hearing transcripts. He was clearly evasive about what position he would take on regulation on e cigs. Outside of supporting limiting access for underage users, he refused to state he wanted to heavily regulate and strangle vaping. This isn't new territory for him, and in the absence of resistance from his boss Secretary Price at HHS (who also has had comments voiced about ENDS as a way to decrease smoking rates) I expected him to announce something like this sooner or later.

What I was surprised by was the timing. He appears to have waited for that Jackson decision to come out first. He even managed to turn that decision into a benefit FOR vaping by stating the court clearly established his and the FDA's right to pursue regulation AND implement it as they saw fit for public health. He views the public's health as being improved by the availability of vaping to allow us to keep off of combustible tobacco products. I wonder how he would have handled this in the Plaintiffs had the decision in their favor. In a sense, this is a cleaner outcome than dealing with a Plaintiff win and come under political pressure to appeal. That would not have left him with a strong hand to push the comply by dates back by years, and by requiring more complete disclosure on just what reasonable applications needed to provide for approval. And he essentially stated those applications aren't required to demonstrate no risk, just reduced risk in comparison to cigarettes.

I always enjoy your informative and thoughtful replies!
 

Eskie

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 6, 2016
16,087
77,744
NY
This was really a pretty slick way to pivot on policy. The soccer moms are happy with no cartoon characters on labels, and vapers get to stay off cigarettes while still maintaining surveillance of how vaping is working out over the long term. As he noted, it may take another generation 30 years down the road to really see the net benefit to the public. Which is accurate. But he also doesn't think we need to wait 30 years to provide that benefit. He even points out why wait for 17 million more to die of tobacco related illness before acting. And he really drew a line between cigarettes and vaping by specifically stating the nicotine in vape juice can and should remain high enough to keep vapers from returning to smoking, further distancing the two products.

And while vaping might still be a "tobacco product" under the TCA, it is not a combustible tobacco product and requires different regulation and encouragement over cigarette use.
 

sofarsogood

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Oct 12, 2014
5,553
14,168
I haven't had much time to digest this but it seems a brilliant stroke of politics. The so-called tobacco control crowd gets their wings mostly clipped. There don't seem to be many howls of protest.It doesn't reduce the importance of my stockpile but it's clearly a huge win for smokers who have yet too discover vaping. I agree that ending the tobacco age is the most important thing and my vape comes second. That doesn't mean I'm personally following anybody's yet-to-be-decided party line. My extra mods and atomizers are stored, my nic is...yup...in the freezer.
 

Zutankhamun

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 22, 2015
3,535
10,062
36
Rapture
I thank everyone that voted for Trump, without him - who knows what would have happened.

:lol: The mistakes over Russia aren't to be mentioned here.
Sshhh.
Or the current Obama care business. Ssshh
Flynn?
Iran?

Hillary as President? :eek:

To be fair, you didn't have much of a choice.

As South Park said. It was between a turd sandwich and a giant douche.

Whatever though, as long as I can take my vape into WW3
it's all good :facepalm:
 

K_Tech

Slightly mad but harmless
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 11, 2013
4,208
5,109
Eastern Ohio, USA
Vape is saved. Deeming dead?

Just got this link in my email.
I'd call it more of a stay of execution. Don't think for a minute that big tobacco and big pharma won't continue to throw their millions towards an attempt to make things go their way. We need to keep fighting, it's not over yet!
 

DaveP

PV Master & Musician
ECF Veteran
May 22, 2010
16,733
42,646
Central GA
The FDA will reclassify electrontic cigarettes as "COVFEFE" in a Tweet tomorrow morning at 0600.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk

No one gets it so far. My Android spell checker changes my perfectly good typed words to meaningless crap too often.
Covfefe Meaning - What Does Covfefe Mean?

Home : Slang Terms : What does Covfefe mean?
Covfefe
Meaning Coverage
Rating
4.1 (8 Votes)

Definition
Covfefe is a misspelling of "coverage." It became a trending topic on Twitter when Donald Trump tweeted "Despite the constant negative press covfefe" on Wednesday May 31, 2017.

The tweet was sent out late at night/early morning (12:06 AM EST) leading some to explain the misspelling was just him being tired. Others believe he was simply too lazy to correct the error or trolling his many adversaries. Regardless, countless memes and tweets circulated Twitter making fun of the mistweet accompanied by #covfefe. The term has been added to the growing list of Trumpisms.

Example
"Did you see Trump's tweet last night?
Yeah, I agree with him, we need to Make America Covfefe Again!"
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread