And I Can't think of a Worse Time for People to be vaping Indoors in Non-Smoking Areas without Asking FIRST than Now. At a time when the FDA is Asking the Public to Comment on e-Cigarettes.
Explain this please.
And I Can't think of a Worse Time for People to be vaping Indoors in Non-Smoking Areas without Asking FIRST than Now. At a time when the FDA is Asking the Public to Comment on e-Cigarettes.
Explain this please.
Yes, exactly...he TALKED to the guy. Re-read the opening post. He "politely informed him" . Now read post #154 where AndriaD accuses him of "accosting" the guy. I'm guilty of what?
Did you even bother to read the op? Or are you just that judgmental?Yes, I do think that going back in, making a big point of upbraiding a total stranger on their behavior does qualify as accosting. If he'd simply made the comment then and there, while it was happening, that would be "talking." Making a big point of it, calling some stranger to account for their behavior, yes, it's accosting, and it's at least equally rude as the stranger's behavior, if not moreso.
Andria
What's to Explain?
The part where the public would know whether or not someone asked to vape indoors.
I can't think of a better time to expose as many people in the general public to the relative harmlessness and good natured respect of vapers.
I am Sure that there were people who were standing in line of the OP Description that were Not Happy with what they Saw. As well as Other people in the Store.
They might not have said Anything. But I would hate to think if they went and Made a Negative Comment to the FDA. Where if that Dude hadn't Vaped while standing in line, that they would have left No Comment what so ever.
Now the op "accosted" the guy. Wow....remember that game called "telephone"? He TALKED to him.
What makes you so sure of this?
Just as possible that someone saw it, and wrote to the FDA along lines of, "now that I've seen this in action and realize it is way different than smoking, I really hope you don't harshly regulate these things. My experience, as one who doesn't use these things, is very positive."
I'm as sure of that occurring as you are so sure of the opposite happening.
Did you even bother to read the op? Or are you just that judgmental?
Considering he came to ECF to post about "That Disrespectful Punk", it's pretty easy for me to imagine how the talk went.
The OP, where he calls he guy a disrespectful punk? Yeah, I saw that. Accosting him sound like a reasonable description, and we're only hearing one side. It would likely sound even worse if we heard the so-called "punks" side.
Accost - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
ac·cost
verb \ə-ˈkȯst, -ˈkäst\
: to approach and speak to (someone) often in an angry, aggressive, or unwanted way
Yes, that's pretty much exactly how it sounds.
Is that what he said he did? If that's what you read in the op, then who's the fool? If you can't make your argument without ridiculous embellishment and exaggeration...then you really have no argument.Sorry, but if you come up to me with the idea that "You vaped inside, that makes you a disrespectful punk and I'm going to fix it!" then things aren't going to go well.
You can pretend that's the same as asking someone for directions if you want. It just makes you look like a fool.
Is that what he said he did? If that's what you read in the op, then who's the fool? If you can't make your argument without ridiculous embellishment and exaggeration...then you really have no argument.
I see, so you're using the words he used to rant on a forum and placing them into the actual situation he described. I gotcha. Wow.The term "Disrespectful punk" is the term the OP decided to use. That shows his attitude, and I don't have any reason to embellish or exaggerate.
I see, so you're using the words he used to rant on a forum and placing them into the actual situation he described. I gotcha. Wow.