In an attempt to promote personal responsibility, vapers and vendors in my local
vaping community are boycotting companies that use labels with obvious child appeal or come close to copyright infringement via font/design to market their juice flavors, such as Blowpop, Zebra cakes, etc...
The idea is that the government and tobacco companies are looking for any excuse they need; therefore, the
vaping community needs to be on their p's & q's to avoid making themselves bureaucratic targets until the general public becomes more knowledgeable and as a result less skeptical of
vaping.
Should parents be responsible with storing their juices? Of course. I have a toddler. There's no way in hell he's getting to my juice - or my completely unappealingly-labeled bleach for that matter. When it comes to teenagers, they're gonna find a way to do what they want, regardless. Example: removing Joe Camel from Camel marketing didn't stop me from smoking as a teen. This is more about companies and vendors showing personal marketing responsibility before the government and tobacco lobbyists use it as an excuse to regulate vaping out of existence.
Honestly, if your juice is good enough you don't need those types of labels to draw in clientele anyway.
Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk
It doesn't really bother me what anyone wants to call it. I just never got into the "juice" terminology over e-liquid. I am surprised that the powers that be haven't caught on to it. My guess is they really aren't following it. This will probably come down to a rider on a bill. We will probably see hidden in the Freedom of Marriage Act of 2015, vaping is defined as smoking along with a 2 trillion dollar grant to study the mating behavior of the Oar fish.
