Does this seem right to you?
- Thread starter khalidmna
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
If a single vendor, on their own, decided to do this? Nothing. If all vendors, on their own, decided to do this? Nothing.
The problem occurs when people start making public outcries of "look at this vendor, look what they're doing!" Or when organizations start making it a part of their application process, like "no WTA" liquid, etc.
Ok, every ejuice now comes in this bottle....it will still poison a child if they drink it, wont it?
Sure it Could.
But how would the Harkins, or Boxers or Diane F's say it was being Marketed towards Children?
Same way they do now, lie about it and create fear and get everyone up in a huff about basically nothing
Did you miss my bold emphasis? Or my second paragraph?
Could someone link me to a news article about a child actually being poisoned by e-juice?
I've googled it and nothing but the fear mongering stories come up
I've googled it and nothing but the fear mongering stories come up
Yeah... But when they Tell their Lies and Don't have Bottles of "Juice" to hold up for the Camera, their Lies are Easier to see.
Even by the Uninformed Public.
None of this in the End really Matters. It's kinda like Arguing that there Should be Age Limits to buy e-Liquids that contain Nicotine. Standardized Labeling is Coming. And there will be No Cartoon Characters.
What is Important Today, is to Do what we Can to get Senators who are on the Fence to see that e-Cigarettes are for Adults who art seeking HRT.
Cartoon Characters are not going to Help those of Us who are Doing what we can to Sway these Senators. Or the Money Givers/Voters these Senators need to stay in Office.
But if I had to choose between brand A
and brand B
I would rather just make my own
and brand B
I would rather just make my own
The "debate," for me at least, is similar to the age limit debate. It probably will have no effect on what happens, but hopefully some vapers will realize that they are furthering the misinformation about vaping that is contributing to its downfall. As long as vapers, with direct access to accurate information, still feel we need to "protect the children," I don't hold out too much hope for vaping.
Nobody is "furthering the misinformation about vaping" by seeing that Images on Bottles can be Perceived as Marketing to Children.
And Anyone who has Watched that Senate Hearing about e-Cigarette Marketing knows that there is NO Way this will not be Used Against Us.
Last edited:
That Great.
Perhaps if you were in the Senate and had a Vote in all this, things might turn out Better.
That Great.
Perhaps if you were in the Senate and had a Vote in all this, things might turn out Better.
I doubt it, I'd still have to convince all the vapers who can't see past "it looks like smoking."
Doesn't seem like to Hard of a Task. I don't know Any who do.
Or did you mean Non-Vapers? Because I know a Boat Load of those.
- Status
Similar threads
