E-Cig Article from Washington Post

Status
Not open for further replies.

Krakkan

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Feb 22, 2009
855
4
New Orleans, LA
www.truesmoker.com
Battery-Powered Cigarettes Deliver a Low-Cost Nicotine Fix. Is That Good or Bad? - washingtonpost.com

[SIZE=+2]A Smoking Experience That's Unmatched[/SIZE]

Battery-Powered Cigarettes Deliver a Low-Cost Nicotine Fix. Is That Good or Bad?
[SIZE=-1] By Richard Leiby
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, April 7, 2009; HE01
[/SIZE]

I had lunch, a cup of coffee and a smoke the other day at the offices of the American Legacy Foundation in downtown Washington. I puffed away for a good 15 minutes, savoring the irony.
Here I was, surrounded by zealous anti-smokers -- Legacy is among the nation's most influential and well-funded tobacco-fighting organizations -- yet I had been invited over to partake in all the nicotine I could handle.
Of course there was a catch: What I puffed on wasn't a Marlboro or any other combustible cancer stick. I didn't need an ashtray. The "smoke" was more accurately fog -- small, vaporous clouds. I was trying out a controversial new nicotine-delivery device that somewhat resembles a cigarette but is actually a plastic tube with a glowing LED at its tip.
"If you just suck on it, it should work," scientist David B. Abrams said, handing me an Njoy brand e-cigarette. (That's "e" for electronic; nothing to do with the Internet, except that the devices are sold there in abundance.) Inside the tube is a lithium battery that warms and aerosolizes a nicotine solution; Njoy says it works like a vaporizer.
After a few puffs, I found myself wreathed in a fine mist of nostalgia. An e-cig supplies none of the flavor or warmth of a real smoke ("Joy of the palate, delight of the nose!" as one forgotten poet put it), yet I was transported back to the days when smoking didn't equal social opprobrium, when hacks like me hammered on typewriters with nicotine-stained fingers, inhaling madly as deadline loomed.
In a word, I got a buzz.
True, you might be sucking on plastic, but the experience is, as Abrams said, "close to the real deal."
As the Legacy foundation's resident expert on addiction and smoker behavior, Abrams and other researchers are intrigued by the devices but also deeply concerned. Could they become another weapon in the smoking-cessation arsenal? Or could they hook more young people on nicotine and serve as a gateway to tobacco use? The products are unregulated, untested in this country and not approved by the Food and Drug Administration, which has sanctioned other nicotine-supplying substitutes such as patches and gum.
Late last month, Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), author of the law that banned smoking on airplanes years ago, sent a letter urging the FDA to take "immediate enforcement action against manufacturers of 'electronic cigarettes' and take these products off the market until they are proven safe." FDA is beginning to get on the case: Although the devices are available online and in scattered retail outlets, the agency says it has halted some imports and is evaluating whether sales require FDA approval.
E-cigs supply nicotine via the lungs -- albeit without the tar, carbon monoxide and other nasties in tobacco smoke -- and thus provide the almost instantaneous "hit" that smokers crave. They offer that "exquisite regulation of brain chemistry that makes smoking so powerful and rewarding," said Abrams, a PhD health psychologist who has studied addiction for 30 years.
"People don't realize that we know of no other way to finely tune the brain than puffing on a cigarette," he told me.
Later, as I sat dragging on the vapor tube, I thought about that. Nicotine truly is a remarkable drug, because it seems to span the spectrum of psychological effects: Some people relax with tobacco products (a fine cigar after dinner); others get an instant boost that helps them focus. One of my editors swears she never wrote better headlines, faster, than when you could smoke in The Post's newsroom.
Abrams, who smoked as a teenager and has tried e-cigs in the name of science, is no knee-jerk foe of nicotine. "I see no problem with giving people lifetime medicinal nicotine," he said. But he certainly doesn't endorse e-cigs, especially since studies have only begun on their safety and efficacy.
Scientists also worry that e-cigarettes may de-motivate hard-core smokers from quitting, by allowing them to stave off nic fits by "smoking" in offices, restaurants and other places where they can't normally light up. Thus the e-cigs become what Abrams calls a "bridge product."
In a joint statement, the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, the American Heart Association, the American Lung Association and the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids blasted e-cigarettes for being "marketed towards young people, who can purchase them in fruit flavors and online, without having to verify their ages."
Njoy literature claims that one of its cartridges (which contain water, flavoring, propylene glycol and nicotine) will last the equivalent of a half-pack of real butts. Unlike those 10 cigarettes, though, which burn down and get stubbed out one at a time, the e-cig doesn't go "out." There's a danger of sucking down too much at one sitting: Nicotine affects heart rate and blood pressure. At least one controlled study is underway, at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, to find out the impact of e-cigs on nicotine levels in the blood.
"I'm not necessarily saying these products are dangerous," said psychology professor Thomas Eissenberg of VCU's Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies. "I just think we ought to know what people get when they use them before we sell them."
His study of 40 smokers, supported by the National Cancer Institute, endeavors to determine how e-cigarettes deliver nicotine and whether they actually suppress withdrawal symptoms.
"For example, if you wake up in the morning craving nicotine, will this take care of that craving?" Eissenberg asked "If it doesn't, then it's a failure. If it makes you go back to your own brand, it's a failure."
Well, at least a failure as a smoking-cessation product. But evidently trying to avoid government regulation, Njoy and other distributors don't make any claim to helping people quit.
"Our target market is the legal-age smoker looking for a product to partake of their dependency in places they cannot smoke -- and to save a few dollars," James Leadbeater, chief executive of Njoy, said from company headquarters in Scottsdale, Ariz. "We are not breaking the nicotine habit, just giving people a better way to get the nicotine."
Given that federal taxes on cigarettes rose significantly on April 1, cost may push some smokers toward alternatives. On the Internet, the Njoy "starter kit," including batteries, a charger and four cartridges, goes for $75. Leadbetter estimates that after the initial investment in hardware, use of his product costs the equivalent of $2.50 per pack. (A pack of smokes runs something like $5 to $9, depending on brand and sales location.)
But "one of the issues that the smoker has to get over is to get used to the taste," said Leadbeater, adding that he has never smoked. (As an ex-smoker, I'd have to agree: The Njoy doesn't taste anything like the real deal. Its vapor delivered a moist, fruity flavor, reminiscent of a hookah session more than anything else.) "They have to make a trade-off so they can use it as an alternative in places that they can't smoke now."
I haven't heard of any celebrity e-cig endorsers, but at least one politician is an aficionado. Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.) said he uses the device -- but chooses a nicotine-free cartridge. "Frankly, I enjoy 'vaping' as a relaxing way to enjoy 'smoking' without nicotine and the harmful effects of smoke and combustible tobacco," he told us in a statement.
The congressman says he's such a fan, "I hope to send a package to President Obama to help him quit or to meet with him and enjoy a harmless, carcinogen-free smoke." Such bipartisanship is touching, and I can't help but steal a friend's joke about why cigarettes are such a great social cohesive, transcending race, religion and class: We smokers are all black on the inside.
As for me, I found "vaping" too, well, plastic to be enjoyable. After I left the Legacy Foundation -- established through proceeds of the great tobacco settlement of 1998 and dedicated ever since to saving lives -- I walked past smokers clustered under the eaves of nearby buildings. A tantalizing wisp of tobacco smoke wended its way through the gentle rain, reaching my nostrils. I inhaled. It smelled delectable.
The old genie beckoned.
Just then there developed a burning in my mouth and an accumulation of phlegm in my throat -- the aftereffects, I realized, of liquid nicotine and just a whiff of secondhand smoke. I walked on, resisting the addictive draw of nostalgia.
Comments: leibyr@washpost.com
 

Sun Vaporer

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Jan 2, 2009
10,146
27
Florida
Krakkan --very good article--thanks--I like this quote here"

"After a few puffs, I found myself wreathed in a fine mist of nostalgia. An e-cig supplies none of the flavor or warmth of a real smoke ("Joy of the palate, delight of the nose!" as one forgotten poet put it), yet I was transported back to the days when smoking didn't equal social opprobrium, when hacks like me hammered on typewriters with nicotine-stained fingers, inhaling madly as deadline loomed."

As it reminds me of Tropical Bob in the early years!! LOL--have to give a thumbs up to Tropical Bob!!!!!!!!!-----Sun
 

TropicalBob

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 13, 2008
5,623
65
Port Charlotte, FL USA
A fine piece and in the one publication that will influence politicians more than any other. The Post is Washington, D.C.'s, mainstay for news (the Washington Times is a bad joke among journalists). The FDA will read this. The White House will see this. Those who would never think of reading a blog will read this. Excellent, overall.

Yes, Sun, it did take be back. I sometimes hit deadline with two cigs burning in one ashtray!
 

Eclectic_Current

Full Member
Mar 30, 2009
22
0
Montreal
Pretty good article i'd say. The one thing that bothers me is the frequently seen simplistic assertion that flavor options are a de facto child lure or gateway. Then, later in the article the author agrees with Leadbeater about having to ..." get used to the taste." Duh, hence the flavors. Still, favorable PR overall i think.

Glad to hear about the clinical study too.
THANKS TB
 

Hexum

Full Member
Apr 6, 2009
57
0
I'm curious as to how you seasoned and supportive vapers are regarding this article as beneficial to the cause?

Reading over it 3 times from an herb(legal)/cigar smoker's perspective, I cannot help but feel that as educated as the writer may be, the lasting impression he leaves is negative.

If you draw a line down a piece of paper and across the top, with positives on the left and negatives on the right, .... well hell, i'll go ahead and do that...
I ended up with 5 more comments depicting e-cigs negatively than statements depicting e-cigs positively.

I'm not sure what the "headline" of the article will be. If it's what it appears to be, "A smoking experience that's unmatched," then it's definitely misleading, as the subheading is a far more accurate representation of what the article is discussing.

I wanted to wait for more of you seasoned vapers to chime in, but, being of the immediate gratification generation, i was compelled to chime in early. Please do share your views explaining why you find this article to be beneficial.

<3,
Hex
 

Eclectic_Current

Full Member
Mar 30, 2009
22
0
Montreal
Pretty good article i'd say. The one thing that bothers me is the frequently seen simplistic assertion that flavor options are a de facto child lure or gateway. Then, later in the article the author agrees with Leadbeater about having to ..." get used to the taste." Duh, hence the flavors. Still, favorable PR overall i think.

Glad to hear about the clinical study too.
THANKS TB

oops, didn't mean to imply the author of the article was being simplistic.
Here is the part i was referring to:

" In a joint statement, the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, the American Heart Association, the American Lung Association and the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids blasted e-cigarettes for being "marketed towards young people, who can purchase them in fruit flavors and online, without having to verify their ages."​
 

Huxley

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 13, 2009
85
0
UK
I thought that was a balanced enough article. I laughed a little at the concern that e-cigs may be used as a 'bridge', as if no smoker ever had used the NRT products in such a way ever! :D When the smoking ban came into force in Scotland I simply used nicotine lozenges when I was at my work, or other places that I couldn't smoke, until I could have a cigarette. I had no intention of giving up smoking and conciously used NRT products precisely as a 'bridge' - except the experts would then say that, because I was using an officially sanctioned product and was therefore 'smoking less', I was in the arena of 'harm reduction! It's all about spin. :D I also know people that specifically use free NRT products not to quit, but to reduce the cost of their smoking!

(FWIW I would actually dispute that I was smoking less. I used to 'cram' cigarettes before and after work, with the net result that I was probably smoking the same amount.)
 

Boston George

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Mar 31, 2009
265
1
Rochester, NY
the parents responsibility to keep there kids away from things they believe are harmful. The Govt cannot and shouldnot be the nannny to anyone.

Although, I fully agree with you but the extent of government influence in the parent-child relationship is a heated debate. Frankly, the e-cigarette cause doesn't need to make that case. E-cigs should take every step possible to childproof their products. If some child gets hurt, any goodwill we may have, will disappear.
 

Wally

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 11, 2009
90
0
San Francisco
I thought the article fairly well-balanced and largely favorable; and in a very influential paper to boot. The article puts e-cigarettes in the running for consideration. I didn't agree with all of it. For example, as an experienced smoker of high-grade cigarettes (Davidoff and Sherman), I find the e-cigarette experience much better than that of conventional cigarettes. It is a much purer, cleaner experience and since using an e-cigarette I have, for the first time in my life, developed an aversion to tobacco. I am also concerned about the implication that the e-cigarette will reduce the motivation of smokers to stop--hanging to to an abstinence approach. If a smoker were to cut his use of tobacco in half with the e-cigarette (an easily accomplished objective) this would be a huge public health victory in any other area. Imagine a population cutting its fat intake in half. As for luring "children" into e-smoking, if it's going to happen, better that than tobacco.

Wally
 

SABOTEUR

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 11, 2009
426
299
68
Baltimore MD USA
Pretty good article i'd say. The one thing that bothers me is the frequently seen simplistic assertion that flavor options are a de facto child lure or gateway. Then, later in the article the author agrees with Leadbeater about having to ..." get used to the taste." Duh, hence the flavors. Still, favorable PR overall i think.

Glad to hear about the clinical study too.
THANKS TB

Such hypocrisy.

Kids...or at least young adults are already past the lure of cigarette tobacco.

Flavored cigars are routinely sold in convenience stores and gas stations. It's not a big secret that these cheap cigars are used by youngsters to roll blunts (marijuana cigarettes). And they don't have to bother about the hassle and delay over purchasing them online, either.

So much for protecting children.
 
Last edited:
It was a very balanced article, and made me glad to see the WaPo carry it. Hopefully it will garner some attention and people will ask "why is the FDA trying to stop these things". I would really love to see the White House take notice, especially with a President who has been struggling to kick the analog habit.
 

CJsKee

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 1, 2009
991
26
Oklahoma
Thanks for sharing this article...

I don't generally share my opinions a lot because sometimes my thoughts don't translate well into the written word LOL...That said, my favorite line in the article:

Nicotine provides "exquisite regulation of brain chemistry that makes smoking so powerful and rewarding," said Abrams, a PhD health psychologist who has studied addiction for 30 years.
"People don't realize that we know of no other way to finely tune the brain than puffing on a cigarette,"


THAT is why we (I) smoke. The fact that I can "equisitely regulate" my brain chemistsry and finely tune my brain by vaping an e-cig without destroying the rest of my body is a god-send.

I thought the article was more un-biased than any of the others I have read. I really hope someone shares an e-cig with the prez...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread