e-cig on WMBD---Not bad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
The ACS rep complains that there isn't research to determine the health effects. I have a suggestion: The ACS has research money -- lots of it. Why aren't they stepping up and volunteering to find out whether this product can reduce health risks, instead of complaining about lack of research?

I thought it telling that she commented that "they are trying to create smoking as a social norm." Like all good lies, there is a smidgen of truth in this. E-cigarettes would not "create" the norm. tobacco cigarettes created the norm. ACS and their accomplices have been working hard to turn smokers into pariahs. Now that vapers don't contribute to air pollution, it's possible that the prejudice that ACS has succeeded in creating against smokers will fade away as smokers become vapers who don't harm bystanders and the environment. Uh-oh. Their authority is being challenged. Control freaks don't like that.
 

Kurt

Quantum Vapyre
ECF Veteran
Sep 16, 2009
3,433
3,607
Philadelphia
Nice story! But now its PG that is the concern? Since when did that change in rhetoric occur? Have they changed the scripts to remove the former DEG comments? The trace carcinogens? How about the candy flavors hooking kids?

I think the winds are blowing in a different direction now. I see this as pretty positive. You can be sure that the ACS pod had to stick to a script, as well as look fresh and pretty doing so, and what she said holds zero water, given the hospital use of PG vapor for antibacterial treatment. And fog machines. And foods. And...

Another strange thing is that PG is not at all cancer-causing. So why would that be the only issue Miss ACS has? There was virtually no mention of the FDA's talking points. This station's story was very much off-script. Watch for the FDA and other anti groups to insist on a rebuttal story...they don't like it when stories leave out their sound-bites.

Something is going on here, and I am leaning towards it being, at least on the surface, good.
 

JustJulie

CASAA
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 30, 2009
2,848
1,393
Des Moines, IA
Great coverage. I loved the written blurb next to the video box: "Representatives from the American Cancer Society say they're just as dangerous as the real deal." :(

What these "charities" are doing is positively shameful. Either they're woefully and negligently uninformed or they're deliberately distorting the truth. Frankly, I'm not sure what's worse. :mad:
 

Posidon

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 4, 2009
132
0
39
The ACS rep complains that there isn't research to determine the health effects. I have a suggestion: The ACS has research money -- lots of it. Why aren't they stepping up and volunteering to find out whether this product can reduce health risks, instead of complaining about lack of research?

This is one of the greatest ideas I have heard.
 

rolygate

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 24, 2009
8,354
12,405
ECF Towers
PG is used as the med carrier in asthma inhalers and is approved by the FDA for that purpose.

PG is used as the med carrier for injectable medicines and is approved by the FDA for that purpose.

PG is used as the mist generator in entertainment venue fog machines and is approved by the FDA for that purpose.

PG is approved by the FDA for human consumption by inhalation, injection, and ingestion, and is used in thousands of medicinal and food applications.

It is one of the most thoroughly tested and researched materials in existence approved by the FDA for human consumption. It can, of course, be used in any application such as paint, antifreeze, engine lube or any other toxic material, just as alcohol might be, as obviously this would not require FDA approval for human consumption.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread