E-Cigarette Forum Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

LibertariaNate

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 7, 2011
2,643
1,697
Utah
It sounds like you might be someone who could benefit from other smokeless tobacco products like Swedish-style snus or dissolvables. Have you tried any of these? There are other alkaloids including several MAO inhibitors that reinforce the "addictiveness" of tobacco that are not in most e-liquids and some people find they are able to become/remain smoke-free only with the help of whole tobacco products.

They've been mentioned in this thread several times and I have read additional threads about them as well.

So yes... I am aware of the other addictive components that exist in tobacco. My initial goal was to ultimately quit all tobacco products; not replace one for another. I understand that many here espouse the principle of "harm reduction" and I take no issue with that. For me, using an e-cig was never about harm reduction, but harm elimination. Yes, I'm aware we can never truly eliminate all the potential harm in the world around us.

I know I am addicted to nicotine and my plan has always been to eventually eliminate my dependence on it. I was also aware of the depression issue from past quit attempts and dealing with the withdrawals from multiple substances has always proven impossible for me. My fear is, what if this depression really is just temporary and it eventually works itself out? If I reintroduce the alkaloids in tobacco to my system I'm back to square one, still addicted to them and further from my goal.

Maybe I'm just naive. Maybe I'll never find my Holy Grail.

Like I said in my last post, I'm nearing the point of total desperation. I don't want to smoke again. If it comes to it, I will use snus before I ever light another cigarette. I'm just not ready to give up the search for my grail.
 

deuxtrouble

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 3, 2011
106
151
55
Canada
I know I am addicted to nicotine and my plan has always been to eventually eliminate my dependence on it. I was also aware of the depression issue from past quit attempts and dealing with the withdrawals from multiple substances has always proven impossible for me. My fear is, what if this depression really is just temporary and it eventually works itself out? If I reintroduce the alkaloids in tobacco to my system I'm back to square one, still addicted to them and further from my goal.

Maybe I'm just naive. Maybe I'll never find my Holy Grail.

Like I said in my last post, I'm nearing the point of total desperation. I don't want to smoke again. If it comes to it, I will use snus before I ever light another cigarette. I'm just not ready to give up the search for my grail.

Eight months I have been quit. And it is just now that I feel like I am coming out of my funk. I am starting to want to live life again, not hole myself up somewhere and watch it pass me by. I actually started taking antidepressants about 2 months ago because I could not level out.

No one really knew because I was very good at smiling when needed, laughing at the usual cues but once I got myself home it just felt like something wasn't there, like a little peice of me was gone (if that makes sense). The one thing I love more than anything in the world (my kids) gave me now joy whatsoever and I found myself increasingly irritated at every little thing that they were doing.

BUT...it is better. I am not sure it is like that for everyone, I just know that I really have not enjoyed my time in that place and am glad that it is finally disappearing. I am hoping that you find your Holy Grail.
 

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
And here is an older report, but to my knowledge, the findings have not been disproven.

DENVER - For smokers trying to kick the habit, it's an article of faith that the worst comes first, and persistence will help tame the beast of withdrawal. Unfortunately, researchers are discovering that nicotine withdrawal symptoms can behave more like characters in a bad horror flick: Just when you think you've killed them, they're back with a vengeance.

Researchers with the University of Wisconsin-Madison Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention (CTRI) have found surprising variation in the "withdrawal trajectory" -- or the length and intensity of symptoms - across smokers attempting to quit. Their studies of hundreds of smokers in cessation programs have shown that many experience intense spikes of withdrawal symptoms months after their initial quit attempts.

The "classic notion" of addiction, Baker said, is that the anguish of withdrawal makes the person go back to using. Yet there has been little evidence to support the connection between relapse and withdrawal, and no explanation for why many relapses occur months after first giving up a substance.

In the recent study in the Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Baker and CTRI co-investigators Thomas Piasecki and Michael Fiore examined withdrawal data from 800 subjects in two clinical trials of the nicotine patch. In both groups, they identified three common patterns, or clusters, of withdrawal response over a two-month period. Baker said the two "atypical" clusters experienced higher relapse rates than the first group. "Smokers who showed increasing or prolonged withdrawal had double or triple the risk of relapse as other patients," he said.

There's more, but I didn't want to copy too much of the story. Read it here: Study Shows Unrelenting Grip Of Nicotine Withdrawal
 

MagnusEunson

Bearded Super Villain
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 30, 2011
4,448
4,789
Behind you
As far as "use cases" go, I'll share my personal story with you. You will find dozens, if not hundreds of similar stories in this site. You will even find similar stories on some of the traditional quit smoking sites that preach you must overcome your "addiction" to nicotine.

*snip*

So Magnus, if you are one of the lucky ones who just enjoys the effects of nicotine but can live a happy and healthy life without it, I envy you. But there is a subset of us who are not as lucky. We are NOT healthier when we give up nicotine. Oh we are healthier in that our lungs and cardiovascular systems are at less risk, but we buy our physical health at the price of our cognitive and emotional health.

That's the whole premise of the hundreds of pages that compose this thread and the original. That's the whole basis for what caused the strange interaction on the QSMB. Most of us in this thread are in the same boat with a collection of stories to boot. That's not all at question posited in the recent CASAA discussion.

The question about CASAA came from the absolute language being employed in some responses here and at the QSMB regarding nicotine and the effectiveness of vaping in general.

As far as diabetes goes, it wasn't even on the radar when I wrote that page. I don't think that there is enough evidence yet to say with certainty that nicotine causes diabetes. In fact, in the MRFIT study, those in the intervention group who managed to succeed in smoking cessation developed diabetes at a higher rate than those who were still smoking.

What I've read and what I specifically referenced was that nicotine in people who are already at risk for diabetes is a contributing factor. I've said in this very thread you have to decide for yourself what risk you're willing to take: Do you overeat or not exercise when you're off of nicotine? Maybe nicotine is the lesser risk for you. I've emphatically insisted that sort of risk balance be taken into consideration on an individual basis.

So much as making fun of the absolute nature of the risk equation employed by the QSMB board: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...e-cigarette-forum-discussion-thread-prev.html

I completely and fully understand the relative risk issue. We all do. I've been on dozens of threads at ECF saying that very thing about flavorings, solder, etc.

The questions raised here are the CASAA page, and people speaking with the weight or impression of "for" CASAA presents the use-cases of nicotine as all positive. Or doesn't present a full picture of what else in tobacco is missing sometimes. I think that's counterproductive to making people feel like CASAA is an honest broker. I used the nicotine page as an example. The doubt came from the way any questions were addressed or any skepticism. It is not unlike dialogue that happens with the other side of the fence. The increasingly loud voices going "Don't question us! You're either with us or against us!" sort of mentality.

Take Thulium's response a little below... or the fact that WTAs and such have been talked about at length in many threads including this one.

Why is it unreasonable for CASAA to include that information about vaping? That vaping may be an incomplete solution and we'd like to help you so here is even more information. Or why can't the negative aspects of nicotine be discussed in the same way you discuss the positive aspects of vaping in general. As a risk decision that needs to be considered for each individual.

I can't see how CASAA loses by presenting even more information about where vaping needs improving or where risk considerations may indeed fall into the 'no nicotine' category. It doesn't change one iota those that are already out to remove this right from us. They're going to say it anyway. It just increases the available information and trustworthiness of the information presented by CASAA. -Magnus
 

MagnusEunson

Bearded Super Villain
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 30, 2011
4,448
4,789
Behind you
There is a really short way to describe why this latest wrinkle was brought up at all:

For those of us who already agree w/ the premise of ECF and CASAA but who have remaining questions or difficulties in finding a happy success, why are questions responded to as if they're dangerous? Or dismissed outright?

That contributes to the feeling that there is a right or wrong and it's always absolute.

Obviously the dialogue that we're able to have here demonstrates otherwise. So I was just suggesting that level of dialogue be translated to a higher level. And uniformly practiced across the advocacy in these early stages of a much larger effort. -Magnus
 

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
There is a really short way to describe why this latest wrinkle was brought up at all:

For those of us who already agree w/ the premise of ECF and CASAA but who have remaining questions or difficulties in finding a happy success, why are questions responded to as if they're dangerous? Or dismissed outright?

That contributes to the feeling that there is a right or wrong and it's always absolute.

Obviously the dialogue that we're able to have here demonstrates otherwise. So I was just suggesting that level of dialogue be translated to a higher level. And uniformly practiced across the advocacy in these early stages of a much larger effort. -Magnus

As I said, I wrote the nicotine page nearly two years ago, and I had never heard that tobacco contains MAOIs at that point. It would be good to incorporate that discussion somewhere. Perhaps the nicotine page isn't the best spot for it. I'm thinking that I would like to expand and update the harm reduction section to include pages for smoke-free alternatives and pharma nicotine similar to the one that has been developed for electronic cigarettes.

I'm also thinking that some kind of advice page on switching could be good as well. What do you think?

I will have to do some more searching of the scientific literature on the concept of MAOIs sustaining tobacco use, as I like to include scientific references whereever possible.
 

MagnusEunson

Bearded Super Villain
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 30, 2011
4,448
4,789
Behind you
As I said, I wrote the nicotine page nearly two years ago, and I had never heard that tobacco contains MAOIs at that point.

I'm also thinking that some kind of advice page on switching could be good as well. What do you think?

Please understand that the nicotine page was used as an example of a general tone. The tone is prevalent throughout the discussion around vaping. Less-so Snus. What changes need to be made first are less about a specific page but on how the advocacy is carried out from paper to person. Whether in-person or via forum.

Regarding the latter, that's covers a lot of what DC2, Sallie, Hobo, XBB, Big, Randy, John, Phone, LOL, Kristin, Nate, MadMac, Shannon, etc. etc. are doing in this thread. Precisely actually.

So yes, I think it's a good idea... and this thread is trying to help put that material together.

And it ties directly into an August contest that I speak about just a few days ago in this thread as well. It's my intention to offer up a series of prizes at different levels (including a custom Vv mod) for those people who can help create graphics and content to help consolidate the "best advice" and "best information" into more easily accessible places.

The two requirements to the contest are that all material is release Creative Commons so it can be used and re-branded elsewhere, including CASAA if they see fit. And everything remain vendor neutral. -Magnus
 

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Interesting patent application:

Field of the Invention

This invention relates to a new and useful medicinal treatment effective in alleviating emotional states characterized by anger, irritability, tension and concomitant fears and anxieties resulting from stressful or frustrative living conditions. The treatment acts to alter emotional balance and expression by two different processes. Anger, hostility, irritability, frustration, and feelings of tension are reduced but without general response depression, drowsiness, or sedation. Simultaneously, reactions of fear, anxiety, and nervousness are reduced and supplanted by improved focus upon and performance of necessary tasks.

The successful treatment of emotional disorders by chemical means has been hampered historically by the lack of objective laboratory methods for quantitative assessment of specific emotional processes. Previously available tests have relied upon gross visual observations of humans and animals in either natural living settings or special artificial social settings. The variability inherent in such tests contributed greatly to the uncertainty of the findings. During the past decade, precise, objective, and efficient methods have been discovered for the measurement of anger, hostility and aggressivity in both man and animals. The techniques, now well established, allow the simultaneous differential assessment of anger and aggressivity versus fear and anxiety. The efficacy of the medicinal treatment according to this invention has been verified by employing these precise testing methods.

Insofar as we are aware, no prior scientifically based disclosure regarding the benefits of nicotine upon emotional processes, behavioral expression, or performance has occurred. The long standing practice in numerous cultures through many hundreds of years of using tobacco products containing nicotine is well known. Nicotine or nicotine related substances have previously been employed or proposed for employment as a treatment for colic (U.S. Pat. No. 101,145), tobacco substitute (U.S. Pat. Nos. 904,521 and 2,981,641), insecticide and parasiticide (U.S. Pat. No. 2,175,980), muscle relaxant (U.S. Pat. No. 3,048,520), snake repellent (U.S. Pat. No. 3,069,314), antihistamine potentiator (U.S. Pat. No. 3,126,319), swine food additive (U.S. Pat. No. 3,252,802) and skin care agent (U.S. Pat. No. 2,437,561).

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention is based on the unexpected discovery that the administration of very small quantities of nicotine or nicotine derivatives to mammals, including human beings, produces in the subject treated immediate and substantial reductions in anger or aggressivity and improved task performance, without general response sedation or reduction.

TREATMENT OF CERTAIN EMOTIONAL DISORDERS WITH NICOTINE COMPOUNDS - Foundation for Behavioral Research
 

lolady

Super Member
ECF Veteran
May 8, 2011
494
1,915
I am on Indian land
It appears that last night's pharmaceutically-impaired "skim" through this thread missed something of a llama stampede.

...a noble goal...

It is a noble goal, and I don't mind repeating myself to say I'm proud to know the people who worked so hard to achieve it

...due to the hostility, it might be doing more harm than good...

Well, as long as it was just hostility we could argue about it. :) In the sense of polite discussion, as is our custom, I mean.

But as is the case with participating in any forum, we're all basically playing in someone else's yard, which means there's nothing to discuss.

He who owns the yard gets to decide who can play there, and he gets to change his mind tomorrow.

Not everybody has the same philosophy about yards.

Some people love having a yard, they enjoy taking care of it, and you'll see them out there every day, removing defunct petunia heads, putting fresh water in the bird bath, and dispatching any stray candy wrappers directly to the Reincarnation bin at the curb.

Other people will buy a condo precisely so they could live their whole lives without ever having to buy so much as one small bag of mulch.

Any horticultural urges they might have are more than taken care of with a geranium or two in a window box.

Still others like the idea of having a yard, but prefer to have someone else do all the cutting and pruning and scraping bird mistake off the statuary.

If their budget isn't a good fit for the local landscaping company's rates, most of the time, they'll go for that condo and geranium.

But once in a while we'll run into somebody who'll invite the neighborhood children to make a flower bed by his mailbox, but upon realizing that maintaining it will require his own time and energy, he'll change his mind, and being disinclined to do the work of removing it himself, will have no qualms about asking a neighbor to dismantle it all, and while they're there, pick up the candy wrappers blown in by yesterday's monsoon wind.

Most of the neighbors, of course, will ignore him. A few may argue with him about the provenance of the candy wrappers, and some can be counted on to suggest in varying degrees of politeness or lack thereof, that he get out there and tend to his own yard.

So if our capricious yard owner is a shrewd fellow, he'll direct his request to the neighbor who's dedicated himself to the cause of getting the street on the town's Prettiest Hood Tour list.

The administration here has put in a lot of effort and invested a lot of resources into making this place too legit to quit, and for obvious reasons don't have the luxury - even if they wanted it - of getting into arguments about whether Dweezlina87 called somebody a doo doo head in post #8934 on Feb 30, and whether she shares a typist with Dweezluna78 on another message board.

Because ECF is not just another forum for fans of a particular video game, or people who are outraged by the overabundance of leopard of The Real Housewives of New Jersey, the story must perforce begin and end with "a complaint was received."

...I pm'd the admin there and asked to have my account deleted...

Especially in light of some of the concerns Magnus expressed, if I understand him correctly, that is probably the most prudent course of action.

There's really no way to prevent bored young folks, or even troubled adults, from doing something like creating an account anywhere, claiming to be this or that character from this or any other message board, and proceeding to post any content they choose, but if I had ever registered "there," I'd probably do what MustangSallie did, and take the extra step of making sure that the moderator here was aware that I had requested my deletion, and would no longer be present "there," in any capacity, just in an overabundance of caution.

...combative...stumped as to how to put that right, trolling doesn't describe what I've seen over there from ecf people, nor does being disruptive...

Personally, I'm inclined to agree with you, but as both "here" and "there" are somebody else's yard, that means each yard owner gets to characterize anything that takes place in his yard using the vocabulary of his choosing, as well as variously speak to, remove, or complain elsewhere about any persons or persons in said yard, for any or no reason, and our opinions about any of it are irrelevant.

And against that backdrop, we have this:

...brain is still messed up...can barely drive a car...have to keep telling myself over and over to concentrate...can't remember things...The doctor told me...that for some former smokers these problems seemed to be more or less permanent...

(bold mine) I bolded it because that is the part that simultaneously gave me goose bumps and tried to mess up my sinuses.

How to navigate that tricky point in the time-space continuuum where somebody else's yard ends and our moral imperative begins?

It's an age-old question, just as "make a way out of no way" is an age-old strategy.

I think Magnus and Randy may be working on a version for this particular age. You are, right? Magnus? Randy? Working on that? ;)

LibertarianNate and deuxtrouble also posted things that tried to mess up my sinuses, and reminded me of one of the wisest quotes I've read anywhere - from a most unlikely source.

When asked about his decision to resign from the cast of "I'm A Celebrity, Get Me Out of Here,"
the old orange movie star, George Hamilton, said this:

I'm 70 years old , if I don't enjoy every day now, I'm stupid

To which I would add that no one need wait for their 70th birthday to claim that as a watchword.
 
Last edited:

hobotivo

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 14, 2011
396
297
73
The land Down Under
The only other forum that I have ever frequented was a sports forum.
And yeah, the percentage of smart folks here is way higher.
:)

And the percentage of smart folks here that are also good at written communication does seem unusually high as well.
I am constantly amazed at how many well spoken people I run across here, including new folks in the New Members forum.

I agree! Most folk on here do seem smarter, on average, than on any other forum I have frequented.

I have no idea why though, other than a desire not to smoke tobacco we seem to have nothing much else in common. And that can't be it, the other board shares that goal and yet they, again on average, are some of the most illiterate people I've ever stumbled across. (Not being deliberately nasty, they just are.)

Good morning to everybody. :)
 
Last edited:

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
There's really no way to prevent bored young folks, or even troubled adults, from doing something like creating an account anywhere, claiming to be this or that character from this or any other message board, and proceeding to post any content they choose, but if I had ever registered "there," I'd probably do what MustangSallie did, and take the extra step of making sure that the moderator here was aware that I had requested my deletion, and would no longer be present "there," in any capacity, just in an overabundance of caution.
I did not request my account to be deleted, but I did take alternate precautions...

I let Rolygate know that I was going to make one last post there in order to explain any sudden disappearances of ECF members, and to let the people there who were in contact with me in private know that I would no longer be available there.

After posting that thread I sent it to Rolygate to read for himself, and then let him know that it was my last post there and that I would not be sending any further PMs there either. I noted that should he receive ANY future complaints about me they are going to be lies.

I am comfortable with that for now.
:)
 
Last edited:

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
I am comfortable with that for now.
Now, having said that, I am feeling a very strong desire to make one really, really last post there.
:lol:

I strongly believe that nicotine cessation should NOT be advocated for everyone.
The post above from Vocalek is a perfect example of what I mean when I say that.

I believe it is immensely important for people to be aware of these potential issues when quitting smoking.
If the 20% numbers are to be believed, that is a lot of people that are in desperate need of that kind of information.

I remember back to one of the posts I read on QSMB from a guy who was really suffering...
QuitSmokingMessageBoard.com • View topic - 6 weeks....still very rough...

At the time, I had to make a choice whether or not to post in that thread information that I was aware of.
I had to balance the good I hoped I was doing for many more people against the good I might be able to do for that one person.
I figured if I posted such information, I would be banned.

That post in that thread was the last post made on that forum by that poster.

So now I find myself sitting here considering making that one really, really, really last post.
And it would be a reposting of the post above made by Vocalek, should she allow me to do so.

I am trying to figure out why I shouldn't do so, and I'm coming up with nothing other than the fact I said I wouldn't.
It may very well get me banned, but obviously that really doesn't matter anymore.

Thoughts?
 
Last edited:

lolady

Super Member
ECF Veteran
May 8, 2011
494
1,915
I am on Indian land
...alternate precautions...I let Rolygate know that I was going to make one last post there...I am comfortable with that for now

You should also be very proud of it.

Further humbling proof, if any were needed, that this is a realm of noblesse so far above my lowly self that such a thing wouldn't even occur to me.

That was an exceptionally kind thing to do. I hope that anyone who strays on to there when they should be here will read your post and effect a location upgrade. :)

...we're still stuck with not quite a destination to go toward...
Um, that's the part you and Randy are working on. :D
 

hobotivo

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 14, 2011
396
297
73
The land Down Under
I remember back to one of the posts I read on QSMB from a guy who was really suffering...
QuitSmokingMessageBoard.com • View topic - 6 weeks....still very rough...

I recall that thread, it was horrible to read. I wanted to say something too, since I was doing it "so easy." I wish, I really wish, that I had. :(

It may very well get me banned, but obviously that really doesn't matter anymore.
Thoughts?

It probably will get you banned there, who cares? Just don't get yourself banned here!

Cheers
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread