They're doing that, Anjaffm? Passing out addictive drugs to children, disguised as chewing gum? I'm not one to go around sueing people with little or no provocation, but this is flat out outrageous.
They're doing that, Anjaffm? Passing out addictive drugs to children, disguised as chewing gum? I'm not one to go around sueing people with little or no provocation, but this is flat out outrageous.
This is low-strength nicotine gum and there is nothing stopping youngsters from the age of 12 buying it over the counter.
‘Decca does not have to inform pupils’ parents about this.’
DECCA Service manager Margaret Storrie defended the council's policy of handing out Nicorette gum to children without telling parents.
'We will investigate the incident and will continue to ensure that young people know about the dangers of giving the gum to others as well as the correct dosage.'
They're doing that, Anjaffm? Passing out addictive drugs to children, disguised as chewing gum? I'm not one to go around sueing people with little or no provocation, but this is flat out outrageous.
'We will investigate the incident and will continue to ensure that young people know about the dangers of giving the gum to others as well as the correct dosage.'
bah humbug!
and how about the dangers of nicotine gum handed out in schools without information to parents?
Boy, 14, collapses after overdosing on nicotine chewing gum handed out in school | Mail Online
that happened in 2009 already...
Hm.. speaking of 2009, where is the FDA blathering about that danger? And why is it not repeated all over the place until this day?
Hm....... makes me wonder... eh?
And so far only two of the calls involved symptoms severe enough to require emergency care. But it's only a matter of time before a child experiences a severe reaction."
Excellent questions!! Very thought provoking, indeed.:in cynical mode: What does "require emergency care" mean in this context? Did the poison control center advise the parent to take the child to the ER (I assume that's what "require emergency care" means) based on the parent's description? What was the extent of care actually provided? Was any follow-up done with the ER?
Do poison control centers follow up on the calls they receive? Or are they simply reporting on what they advised the caller? (Asking because I'm not familiar with PCCs.)
Also, the statement "it's only a matter of time before a child experiences a severe reaction" implies to me that the reactions they're talking about in the article were not "severe." Or am I nitpicking?
:unable to exit cynical mode:
The National Poison Data System (NPDS) is the only comprehensive poisoning exposure surveillance database in the United States. Maintained by the American Association of Poison Control Centers, NPDS contains information from the human poison exposure case phone calls taken by all 56 poison centers across the country.
I've been researching poison control centers.
The AAPCC website answered one of my questions: It is standard procedure to follow up on calls. The following report, in fact, gives numbers for those treated at a medical facility and the various treatment outcomes (none, minor, moderate, major, death). (You can do a word search for "nicotine" to find the relevant tables.)
Here is their report for the most recent national statistics, 2011: https://aapcc.s3.amazonaws.com/pdfs/annual_reports/2011_NPDS_Annual_Report_-_Final.pdf