That seems to be the way things are going with regulation, is that correct?
0 nic is not a tobacco product.
Mods and atomizers can be used to vape 0 nic.
Therefore, mods and atomizers are not a tobacco product.
The FDA doesn't, at present, regulate tobacco pipes either, but pipe tobacco now falls under FDA jurisdiction.
I'll rephrase, e-liquid is now a tobacco product.
The FDA doesn't, at present, regulate tobacco pipes either, but pipe tobacco now falls under FDA jurisdiction.
I'll rephrase, e-liquid is now a tobacco product.
I'm OK with regulation and standards of practice for nicotine liquid production.
Anything else vape related that the FDA tries to regulate should be met with firm opposition. It is not reasonable for them to address electronic devices, nor is it their job.
Join CASAA. Donate. Contribute time for the cause.
It's the cost of regulating those liquids that we need to worry about. As I read the regs. every ingredient of every flavor a vendor makes needs to be certified at $1,500.00/ingredient. Doesn't matter if the already FDA approved PG was approved for the last flavor, it needs to be approved again for the next flavor.
I'm OK with regulation and standards of practice for nicotine liquid production.
The industry can't do that on their own..?
Trade association - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Why does the federal government feel the need to step in?
(I already know the answer to that...)
0 nic is not a tobacco product.
Mods and atomizers can be used to vape 0 nic.
Therefore, mods and atomizers are not a tobacco product.
The better question is, why do so many people think they need the government to baby sit them?