Email From Diane Feinstein

Status
Not open for further replies.

mooreted

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 10, 2011
2,979
1,177
California
Finally got a reply back:


Thank you for writing me to express your opposition to increasing taxes on tobacco products in order to fully fund the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). I appreciate the time you took to write and welcome the opportunity to respond.

As you know, when Congress enacted IDEA in 1975, it authorized the Federal Government to contribute up to 40 percent of the cost associated with educating students with disabilities. This commitment was to ensure that the nearly six million students with special needs receive the same quality of education as their peers without overburdening local school districts. To date, this commitment has never been fully funded.

On July 21, 2011, Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) introduced the "IDEA Full Funding Act" (S. 1403), which would fulfill the commitment to fully fund IDEA through Fiscal Year 2021. Funding for the program would come from a tax increase on tobacco products, specifically cigarettes, cigars, roll-your-own tobacco, smokeless tobacco, and other tobacco items as defined by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTCA; Public Law 111-31).

Currently, items such as dissolvable tobacco and electronic cigarettes do not fall under FSPTCA's definition of a tobacco product and would not be taxed under S. 1403. However, on July 7, 2011, the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) released a notice that it plans to issue a new rule soon, which would deem that all products which meet the broader, statutory definition of a tobacco product under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, would also be subject to the jurisdiction of FSPTCA. Should this proposed rule be issued and finalized, dissolvables and electronic cigarettes would be taxed under S. 1403.

S. 1403 is currently pending in the Senate Committee on Finance. While I understand your opposition to increasing the tax on tobacco products contained within the bill, I am concerned that school districts may be overburdened by the costs of special education. As states cut back on education budgets, local school districts have been forced to cut some of their services or raise taxes to pay for the special education services they are mandated to provide. Please be assured that I appreciate hearing your opposition to S. 1403 and will keep it in mind should this bill come to the Senate floor for consideration.

Once again, thank you for writing. If you have any further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact my Washington, D.C. office at (202) 224-3841. Best regards.


May I wish you and your family a happy and healthy holiday season.

Sincerely yours,

Dianne Feinstein
United States Senator
Further information about my position on issues of concern to California and the Nation are available at my website,Feinstein.senate.gov. You can also receive electronic e-mail updates by subscribing to my e-mail list. Click here to sign up. Feel free to checkout my YouTube Page.
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
Yeah, I also got my reply from Feinstein, and it was the same as yours.

I will never respect or consider voting for either her or Boxer, but I have to say one thing...
At least she had the guts to indicate in her reply exactly what her position is.

I know that doesn't mean for one second that she read my comments.
But at least it shows that her staff is asked to take the time to separate the pros from the cons.

However, the part about understanding my opposition to the tax increases on tobacco products is clearly BS.

She obviously has not read my comments and doesn't understand what my real concerns are.
In that respect, she is the just the same as all the rest.
 

rothenbj

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2009
8,271
7,686
Green Lane, Pa
Isn't it nice to know the education of children with disabilities falls out of the pockets of a select group of individuals as opposed to the overall population? You should be honored that health benefits and education have been placed on your broad shoulders. Carry the load wisely.
 

mooreted

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 10, 2011
2,979
1,177
California
Pffft! Sure, sure, that's it. Tobacco taxes go to help poor disabled children get an education. I must be a terrible person who hates poor disabled children since I don't want to pay for their education with my vaporized tobacco taxes. I think I'll go kick some puppies too.

(expletive deleted) (expletive deleted) (expletive deleted) (expletive deleted)
 

Ande

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 27, 2011
648
407
Korea
Wow. Yes, Diane, we are all concerned about the children.

Seriously- I am in favor of funding for special education. My only two questions:

Is it fair for the costs of special education, which benefits a whole society, fall more on some than others?

Is it smart to create a future situation where special education funding is dependent on maintaining tobacco use at or above current levels?

That's all. We think of the children too. It just makes sense to think of the children, rather than use them as a cheap talking point.

Ande
 

rothenbj

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2009
8,271
7,686
Green Lane, Pa
You know there's a whole semi-underground culture that involves smoking that would be very happy to support the education of children with disabilities if the government elected to make it a legitimate product. It would not only make the consumers happy but free up much needed prison space for violent criminals. Just sayin
 

rothenbj

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2009
8,271
7,686
Green Lane, Pa
It's not really all about children. It's about how to raise money without hurting good people.

This legislation makes sense, because it doesn't harm, or even inconvenience good people.

Only tobacco users.

Best regards,
Ande

You know Ande, there is a lot of truth to your post. As long as the tobacco user can be categorized as less than the model citizen, the government justifies their financial torment, until it gets to close to home. They sure jumped into action to protect "small business" in proposing legislation that would protect the cigar industry from the destructive promulgation advanced by the FDA. The smelliest of all smoked tobacco gets protection while safer alternatives get promulgated out of existence (they hope).
 

Sanity Challenged

Full Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 9, 2011
69
196
51
Kalamazoo, MI
Pffft! Sure, sure, that's it. Tobacco taxes go to help poor disabled children get an education.

This is a phenomenal idea with absolutely no downside. I for one can't wait for school fundraiser time, when the children get to go door-to-door peddling cigars instead of overpriced Kit Kats.
 

Katya

ECF Guru
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 23, 2010
34,804
120,147
SoCal
It's not really all about children. It's about how to raise money without hurting good people.

This legislation makes sense, because it doesn't harm, or even inconvenience good people.

Only tobacco users.

Best regards,
Ande

Are you really suggesting that smokers are bad people??? Or was your remark tongue-in-cheek?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread