It's funny all the alcoholic, cigar-smoking, over weight politicians behind this sort of thing.
Are you really suggesting that smokers are bad people??? Or was your remark tongue-in-cheek?
Isn't it nice to know the education of children with disabilities falls out of the pockets of a select group of individuals as opposed to the overall population? You should be honored that health benefits and education have been placed on your broad shoulders. Carry the load wisely.
Yeah, I also got my reply from Feinstein, and it was the same as yours.
I will never respect or consider voting for either her or Boxer, but I have to say one thing...
At least she had the guts to indicate in her reply exactly what her position is.
I know that doesn't mean for one second that she read my comments.
But at least it shows that her staff is asked to take the time to separate the pros from the cons.
However, the part about understanding my opposition to the tax increases on tobacco products is clearly BS.
She obviously has not read my comments and doesn't understand what my real concerns are.
In that respect, she is the just the same as all the rest.
How about cutting funding for sports programs and using the money for say..... ah.... Education. I always thought school was supposed to be about getting an education not about getting naked in a shower with a bunch of other guys.
Same goes with the sin tax they passed in Ohio to build the stadiums. Multimillionaires getting tax money in order to get more money? If the Indians actually win a World Series what do I get out of it? If the Browns actually win a Superbowl do I get a cut of the money? Do I get a cut of the ticket sales?
It's the same difference.
They will not stop unless we stop them and it's one huge battle- all about control, very little about science.
I'm reading an interesting book right now:
The War on Smokers and the Rise of the Nanny State, Theodore I. King