Well, half of it will go in the freezer right away.You do have a defibrillator on hand, don't you Mike?
Well, half of it will go in the freezer right away.You do have a defibrillator on hand, don't you Mike?
let me know how that turns outAlso got a cherry and farmer cheese babka
OK, so, I switched to a 5mmID SS430 single coil in a Merlin:
But, when I plugged in the copper plug to check the mod resistance I got this:
- Measured with the Kelvin meter it measured 0.74 ohms
- Measured on the DNA75C it measured 0.73 ohms
- Measured on a DNA200 it also measured 0.73 ohms
- mod resistance is set at 0.003
View attachment 664079
Notice the room temp..... (about 74 in the room)
Let the mod cool again (unplugged with no atty) for about 15 minutes, the room temp still said 92.1
However, I would say it is reading the coil correctly. +/- 0.01 ohms is not something I would normally be concerned about. Its only a variance of 1.3%, and remember, Evolv claims a variance of +/- 10%.
Yeah, I am curious myself. I just love the cinnamon sooooo much, but cherry/cheese sounds pretty damn good too.let me know how that turns out![]()
I will read through it when I get a chance, soooo many projects, so little time.Sorry Mike, it doesn't work that way. I thought the same thing about using percentages of error with cold res to calculate temp errors until I read this thread.
TC beyond Ni200: Nickel Purity, Dicodes; Ti, SS, Resistherm NiFe30; Coefficient of Resistance
"TheBloke" and "Balask go into detail with mathematical formulas why this is not true. The formula our mods use to calculate coil temp from res change is not linear but rather a product of the TFR at a given temp in reference to the cold res.
Bottom line is we're dealing with non-linear multipliers and even those based on different TFR values for each wire material type. This is why I keep insisting that a .010 ohm error in cold res is huge. For SS it will cause upwards of a 50°f error at our normal vaping temps and with Ti much more error still, 80°f plus.
I did understand the math at some point during my stay on that thread but I can't quote the formulas now. Anyway, the formulas on that thread are not too complicated and will be useful to you based on the direction you're heading with TC enlightenment.
not a fan of cinnamon and/or chocolateYeah, I am curious myself. I just love the cinnamon sooooo much, but cherry/cheese sounds pretty damn good too.
Different set of circumstances, because I did NOT look closely at the mod resistance on this particular mod when I did the test as it had been set long ago:Sorry Mike, it doesn't work that way. I thought the same thing about using percentages of error with cold res to calculate temp errors until I read this thread.
TC beyond Ni200: Nickel Purity, Dicodes; Ti, SS, Resistherm NiFe30; Coefficient of Resistance
"TheBloke" and "Balask go into detail with mathematical formulas why this is not true. The formula our mods use to calculate coil temp from res change is not linear but rather a product of the TFR at a given temp in reference to the cold res.
Bottom line is we're dealing with non-linear multipliers and even those based on different TFR values for each wire material type. This is why I keep insisting that a .010 ohm error in cold res is huge. For SS it will cause upwards of a 50°f error at our normal vaping temps and with Ti much more error still, 80°f plus.
I did understand the math at some point during my stay on that thread but I can't quote the formulas now. Anyway, the formulas on that thread are not too complicated and will be useful to you based on the direction you're heading with TC enlightenment.
In case nobody noticed, and if you have a day to kill....
You know, something occurred to me after watching excerpts from his vid (all I can handle is excerpts, or I go brain dead). ALL of my devices, I seem to be running hotter settings now than I used to, not just the 60/75 series, but also the 200/250 series.
They have changed Escribe, and issued service packs for just about every device recently. I wonder if the new "curves" are just different across the board on everything????
Now, I run beta software too, so some of that could be beta issues.
Anyway, just an observation.
I don't have a day to kill, although it's kind of hot to work outside today, but I couldn't watch the whole thing. My take-away is that the boards perform as advertised and within tolerances. I haven't seen exactly how he's measuring temperature, IE probe and instrumentation, so I'll reserve judgement there other than to say if he's running at 500F he needs to do some reading of a certain thread.
It's funny you say you've raised temperatures, Mike. I've lowered all of mine and spent some time in device monitor to keep things matched, temp versus power. I was vaping at 480 or so on most everything, but have found I'm just as happy at 400 or lower. It can also be a function of "mood" so the jury is still out.
hey, mike! katz is branching out to brooklyn - maybe, next stop: martinsville!
![]()
Many times I'll go to bed, fall asleep with the mod set at 430 and when I wake I'll take a hit and it's holy crap, pop fizzle, I have to back it down to 390-400 again. I think it's a combination of temp's of the mod, atty and saturation of the wick, that's with each and every one of the seven 200's and the two 75's I use.