Evolv-ing Thread

Tpat591

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 28, 2014
2,728
9,711
RB nj
Get the feeling it is just hitting the market on pre-orders.

file_1_1.jpg
 

Tpat591

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 28, 2014
2,728
9,711
RB nj
upload_2016-4-18_9-36-53.png

upload_2016-4-18_9-38-2.png

Yeah you couldn't really tell from the FT pics. Guess they are just selling the concept that you can see inside the chamber while vaping so long as you use a liquid with very little coloring and your chamber doesn't gunk up too quickly.
 
Last edited:

Pdizzle

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 30, 2014
300
684
Alberta
I thought you had your own 3D Printer. Is there a problem with layout?

I've been looking around at 18650 battery sleds and they are usually about 21mm w x 78-80mm tall. The inside of that printed ERM layout is 20.8mm so stock sleds are going to need modification to fit inside. Currently working on a different sled design.
No I don't own one. But I have a guy lol
Just looking to re house my board and battery.
 

Tpat591

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 28, 2014
2,728
9,711
RB nj
Last edited:

Tpat591

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 28, 2014
2,728
9,711
RB nj
I'm actually working on a stabwood DNA75 myself lol
Just figured the Erm printed version would be a nice change for my DNA200. But it's got a 1500mah lipo roughly the same size as the max Amps 1850
Got a VTR 200 file I can dig out in a day or so for the 200 & the 1500mah turnigy losi flite battery 19.6mm x 29mm? x 96mm? if it helps but its big - 72mm wide.
 
Last edited:

Tpat591

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 28, 2014
2,728
9,711
RB nj
I like that low tank, tpat!
Figured of all the people I know you might be the only one! Its untested and I took the FDV battery tube measurements from this
upload_2016-4-18_11-18-19.png

So it ought to work. Also have it up there with a front faceplate up there but that is for a FDV 510 and 8mm taller than it has to be. Havent done the shorter body for the front Faceplate yet.

Did not put any plate mounting holes in the VTR files yet & if you are going to use that file you will need to go old school or use a hot glue gun.

Crapp! Just saw an error in the file below the usb so I'm Taking it down. You will Get a 404 error shortly.
 
Last edited:

mikepetro

Vape Geek
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 22, 2013
10,224
81,686
67
Newport News, Virginia, United States

berger

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 2, 2010
193
732
Carvahall
After almost 24 hours later, I have to say I still like the original Izer better. Perhaps its just "the beast I know".

Thats not to say the Supreme is bad, far from it, it is a good atty. It just isnt quite as satisfying a vape as the original. I am getting great flavor, just not getting as much visible vapor. Not looking for clouds by any means, not that kind of guy, but the "normal" amount of vapor is lacking so far. I am still playing with juice/air flow settings trying to find the sweet spot as I suspect that somehow the limitation is me.

Now to be fair, I have had the original Izers for a while, and am well past the learning curve on them, perhaps I will get there with this too. But for now at least, I am glad I have a half dozen originals.....

Thanks Mike, went ahead and cancelled the FT order...they kept putting off shipping several times so i said the heck with it :)
 

Steamer861

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 13, 2014
2,710
23,383
Canada
A quick question about the new DNA75, if you can answer it for me Mike/VB?
The 200 has the preheat, I set mine to 100 watts for the first 3 seconds.
To get that quick blast, for a shorter more enjoyable draw :)
Does the pre heat on the new board only go up to 75 watts?
In your opinion do you see the limitations of the single cell 18650 config? Or does it vape as good as a 200?
 

Users who are viewing this thread