psssst.... Was typing out my post at the same time.I believe they were sued over the eGo, it was actually the design of another company and joyetech were to be the manufacturer. At least that's how I remember it.
!!! G*NOTE FIVE !!!
psssst.... Was typing out my post at the same time.I believe they were sued over the eGo, it was actually the design of another company and joyetech were to be the manufacturer. At least that's how I remember it.
From what I can tell from the link in the opening post, indeed Joy Tech has been in litigation in the US previously. I have not read the circumstance or outcomes of previous cases, so I am unable to offer an explanation.
If you had read the filing by Evolv you would have seen:
joyetech China 13. This Court also has personal jurisdiction over joyetech China because Joyetech China has availed itself of United States District Courts in order to sue defendants in the United States, alleging infringement of Joyetech China’s own alleged intellectual property.
The mentions in the filing pertains to Joyetech having availed themselves of using that branch of the courts for filing previous suits on behalf of Joyetech as the plaintiff. There is also the establishment of the US arm of Joyetech being based in jurisdiction of the applicant court:I believe they were sued over the eGo, it was actually the design of another company and Joyetech were to be the manufacturer. At least that's how I remember it.
We released the eGo-T electronic cigarette to improve the problem of short battery life and frequent refills.
I think with a bit of digging one could kick over a rock or two about Joyetech doing dirty deeds.
Yes yes yes!!! I forgot about Janty. With all the players involved...Ovale, Janty & Joyetech....it was all shady but interestingly enough sounds (in a way) like the fight JT is having with Evolv now.Perhaps Joyetech counter sued.
I remember the original article about Joyetech stealing designs from Ovale and Janty. I know Ovale claimed creation of the eGo-T and Joyetech claimed it as theirs.
I find it highly suspicious that Ovale sells Joyetech branded items on their site.
From the Ovale site:
The way they say "We released" instead of created seems odd.
Phil Busardo has that video up of the two Joyetech guys, one who created the 510 and the other the Ego or something to that effect. I wonder if those guys were originally employed by Janty and Ovale.
I think with a bit of digging one could kick over a rock or two about Joyetech doing dirty deeds.
Cost when smoking for me was under $5/day. Cigs 3.30/pack 1 yr ago.I use the money argument when all else fails. Cost when smoking
=$15.00 a day. Cost of vaping = $0.40 cents in juice.(when bought retail locally)
People around here start to get it when you talk money. You can pay what
you want for a car. Some may balk at the cost. When you tell them what kind
of mileage you get then they get interested.
Regards
Mike
That wouldn't be an accurate truth, you still must purchase juice, coils, wicking, wire...etc.
Many spend more vaping vs smoking, I quit making the money savings argument long ago. I stick with the health argument, can't put a price on living longer.
I read all 24 pages as well & while not a lawyer it seems pretty apparent to me that Joytech admitted fault & knowingly infringed on the patent. Seems about as clear as a legal document can be to me at least. It's too bad those who are defending Joytech & accusing Evolv of patent trolling as well as potentially suing everyone else in the industry haven't done the same before commenting.
This is a business deal gone bad, not a patent troll or threat of monopolizing the vaping industry as we know it. Evolv holds the patent, it's explicitly explained for exactly what the patent is, they chose to go after a competitor who they feel disregarded their patent rights. Simple business reason & decision IMO.
So assuming Evolv wins and ALL vw/tc-devices sold on US need to come with their chip what would be the cost of new hardware?
Would it put new vapers into position where they simply can't get a decent priced starting setup with less than 100$ not to mention the fact there would be a lot "out-of-stock"?
Not taking sides beign european (we don't get ANY fancy toys).
Ok, if I add "in theory if" would you care to quess?
Also in order to save their face they NEED to sue ALL not to make this look like a mad dash for cash.
Evolv's motive is speculation at this point.
So, this seems somewhat at odds then: why file a suit seeking damages when there is (supposedly) little chance of recovery of award?So while Evolv may or may not win this case, and we are still waiting on Joy Tech's side of the story, it is likely Evolv will never get a financial reward.
So, this seems somewhat at odds then: why file a suit seeking damages when there is (supposedly) little chance of recovery of award?
Evolv's motive, at least for this case, seems very clear: get an injunction against Joyetech to force them to remove the infringing products from the market, and financial compensation for damages incurred to Evolv. (pages 20-22 of the filing)
Here in the cities it's still mostly ego-vv -vw type stuff mostly thatCost when smoking for me was under $5/day. Cigs 3.30/pack 1 yr ago.
Many spend more than that on juice every day.
Actually, I believe you could file suit seeking only the injunction to stop the import and sales of infringing product. Damages are an optional part of the suit but are generally asked for as a means of collecting money to cover the costs of filing the suit.Because part of any civil suit is damages. In this particular case the only way I see Evolv collecting any damages is by getting a favorable judgement and a smallish financial award. For example Evolv may be able to collect a $500,000 award but has little to no shot of collecting a $50,000,000 award.
I think the biggest reason for the law suit is the way Joy Tech handled being told they were infringing on the patent in the beginning. Joy Tech practically ignored Evolv for several months before coming back to Evolv and admitting guilt.
Seeking or proving damages is a typical part of civil law suits. You must prove you were and are financially harmed in some way. This does not mean that Evolv's primary reason for the filing is financial gain. I'm sure they know any judgement will have little affect outside of the US. To be honest I'm not even sure if a favorable ruling for Evolv would hurt Joy Tech's importing RX200's or other named devices.
By the time this suit is resolved this technology is likely to be outdated anyways. I wouldn't expect a judgement ruling sooner then 12 months. It is possible some sort of injunction could come out before the case is resolved but I suspect we are still months away from that. Nothing moves fast in the courts.
Actually, I believe you could file suit seeking only the injunction to stop the import and sales of infringing product. Damages are an optional part of the suit but are generally asked for as a means of collecting money to cover the costs of filing the suit.
I'm not going along with the "Joyetech admitted guilt" argument as it's stated in the filing. Asking about what licensing fees would be is not the same as admitting guilt - that's an inference being drawn, and that's only what Evolv is saying about the incident.
But you're right that it will be a while before we see any outcome from this suit, unless there is a settlement before it ever hits trial. Time will tell.