You have failed to point out where the OP is wrong. Adding the word "style" to something doesn't mean you've said it's a clone.
Sorry, but you failed to recognize that style means not original here. Would you ever think that Ford-style car is a genuine Ford? And style is wider than clone.
All that said, the OP merely stated that FT is not an official distributor of genuine Vision products and should not be thought of as such. The fact that regular users of FT already know their products are not all genuine doesn't make the OPs point any less true.
Merely stated? See what was written:
Just goes to show that fast tech sells clones and cheap garbage
And it is pure lie. I am not in love with fasttech, I just do not like to see lies about vendors.