Mr. Gearhart,
I don't know if you're aware of this issue, or have a stance on it, but I do know that you are far more likely to actually read and respond to citizen concerns than our own esteemed representatives. I have recently discovered that the FDA, in their ongoing irrational war against e-cigarettes, is once again seizing shipments of these products and holding them indefinitely despite recent federal court rulings instructing them to back off.
This concerns me on two levels. First, that a government agency would so flagrantly act in violition of a legal court order with impunity (essentially stealing goods bought and paid for by small business owners), and second that they have chosen to stand against the very citizens they purport to protect, and act instead in the interest of the tobacco and pharmaceutical industries.
I don't want to waste too much of your time, but as an 18-year smoker who recently found this product, I am absolutely shocked and appalled that the FDA would act so aggressively in attempting to ban outright the one product that has instantly and effortlessly transformed me into an ex-smoker. I am not alone. There are many, many others who began "
vaping" e-cigarettes as a cheaper and potentially safer alternative to tobacco, a known killer loaded with carcinogens and 4,000 chemicals, who found that we had quit smoking cigarettes quite by accident. E-cigarettes are, in my estimation, the single most effective way to quit smoking in existence today. And the FDA wants to ban them.
Their claim is that e-cigarettes are dangerous, containing carcinogens and toxins. They base this claim on shoddy experimentation clearly designed to reinforce their existing belief, rather than on solid, emperical science. And in fact, a number of health organizations, doctors, and scientists have thoroughly debunked their study, yet they persist. E-cigarettes are currently believed to be 1,000 times safer than conventional cigarettes, containing the same ingredients as much more expensive pharmecutical products like the Nicitrol inhaler, but working much more effectively. If the two devices were allowed to compete in an open market, Pfizer would be crying in their coffee.
But what the matter really comes down to is that adults should be free to make their own choices. We know that smoking cigarettes will kill us in horrific ways. We can also see that e-cigarettes appear to be, but are not guaranteed to be, safe. Why take such an effective alternative off the table for us when it works so well? Between "known to cause cancer" and "possibly somewhat harmful" I'll take the latter every time. Is the FDA so beholden to the pharmecutical and tobacco lobby that they show such brazen disregard for our laws and the people they purport to serve?
This is an issue of personal freedom.
It is an issue of free enterprise.
It is an issue of reason and responsibilty winning out over ignorance, fearmongering, and manipulation.
I hope that you and your staff take some time to research this issue and trust you to draw your own logical conclusions. It could save many lives.
Sincerely,
Nathan [redacted]
Bridgewater, NJ
Two of many links exposing the fraud in the FDA's study:
Tobacco Truth: The FDA Crusade Against E-Cigarettes
FDA Says E-Cigarettes Have Carcinogens & Toxic Chemicals