Fda news release

Status
Not open for further replies.

Our House

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 29, 2009
402
25
NJ, USA
BTW, I know someone mentioned the May 4th delaying thing earlier, but I'm extra curious as to why the FDA acted like there were no studies done the whole time and insisted that other people conduct them without ever disclosing that they had their own.

I'm also curious as to whether or not studies paid for by the manufacturers (as the FDA is requesting) would even be admissible in the US. From what I've heard, the New Zealand and Ruyan studies were inadmissible for that reason. Maybe Sun can weigh in here and tell us if the FDA is asking for an impossibility.
 

OutWest

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Feb 8, 2009
1,195
1
Oklahoma USA
www.alternasmokes.com
Is no one else incredibly suspicious of how the FDA issued statements both in and out of court about how studies needed to be done by the manufacturers so e-cigs could go through approval process, so that they could be shown to be safe, so that we know what's in them, etc. etc...

...all while they had this study of their own already conducted since May 4th -- that showed "known carcinogens" in these products -- but was kept secret for 2.5 months?
Yep, I agree, very suspicous indeed. I think they've been holding onto this in case they needed it in court. And, because the FDA is losing ground, they decided to use the media to scare the public into avoiding the ecig and thus destroying the industry in the U.S.

Thing is, like someone posted on vapersforum, nitrosamines are in most processed meats and that's fully FDA approved. And, like Dr. Siegel wrote, the same stuff is in the nicotrol inhaler, which is fully FDA approved. So, except for that one SE brand cart that had the DEG, is it really that big of a deal? The FDA wants the public to think so, but if it's so terrible, they'd better yank the approved NRT products that use natural nicotine off of the shelves immediately.
 
Last edited:

Mr Sinister

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 2, 2009
397
0
Illinois
Parts per Billion!?!?!?!? Are they F'in serious? Our drinking water isn't even tested that thoroughly. If they really cared about the health of the public and the children, they wouldn't have approved adding fluoride in the water and whatever other crap they allow, which they measure in PPM by the way. This is so bias it's laughable. What's not laughable is their opinion is the only one that counts.
 

chad

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 6, 2009
512
101
NY, USA
cybervapor.com
Ok,

So who wants to start drafting a letter we can ALL send to the FDA?

One thing we have going for us is strength in numbers (and motivation by nic fit ;)). We just need to get organized. Letters, phone calls, and marches are all real good ideas now.

Remember the FDA (and the rest of the US government) works for us! We just need to, very loudly, let them know what we want. It's one thing to rant and rave on e-cig-forum where we preach to the choir. It's entirely more beneficial to us to step up and be counted.

Who can help us organize?
 

CoderGuy

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 20, 2009
156
0
63
Washington, USA
Whether or not the FDA are conspiring against e-cigs is not something I really care about.

The fact is, they still haven't been able to dispute that these are better than cigarettes.

Traces of carcinogens? Okay. I think I heard that there are "traces" of carcinogens in analogs too *ahem*.


True, but it's all about perception. What went from being a novelty in the media has now been "proven" to be harmful. They have the anti-smoking groups, American Cancer Society, American Lung Association, all the parent's groups, etc. etc. on their side, in addition to the tobacco companies, who despite the fact that we have a common enemy, are against us as we are taking food out of their mouths (they don't make money on e-cigs), and finally, the state governments, who do not get tax revenue from e-cigs.

No, facts have nothing to do with any of this, it's all about the money, the agendas, the tax revenues, and anyone that doesn't believe that is fooling themselves.

CoderGuy
 
Last edited:

MVP

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 13, 2009
163
0
MN,USA
Dr. Siegel weighs in:

The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary

Quote from blog:

"Given the finding that nicotine replacement products and electronic cigarettes both contain carcinogens, why is it that the American Lung Association is only calling for the recall of electronic cigarettes, not other nicotine replacement products? Shouldn't the ALA also express concern about nicotine replacement medications due to the fact that they create documented exposure to carcinogens and that there is therefore no safe level of exposure to nicotine replacement products?"

This should NOT be ignored. Where do you think they get the nicotine for NRT products? A: From Tobacco, and they contain the same TSNAs as e-cigs. Though they (the Nicotrol inhaler used in these tests) weren't tested for carcinogens because they know TSNAs are also in NRTs.
 

cddz

Supplier's Manufacturer - Offline
ECF Veteran
May 14, 2009
1,761
97
Newark, Ohio
Parts per Billion!?!?!?!? Are they F'in serious? Our drinking water isn't even tested that thoroughly. If they really cared about the health of the public and the children, they wouldn't have approved adding fluoride in the water and whatever other crap they allow, which they measure in PPM by the way. This is so bias it's laughable. What's not laughable is their opinion is the only one that counts.
Actually they do Arsenic is tested in ppb, in fact the max arsenic allowed prior to 2006 was 50ppb, EPA gave everyone 2 years to comply with the new standard 10ppb
Just my .02 Local news station had a small piece on the FDA statment and left it at they contained antifreeze!!!!!!!
 

need_2quit

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 5, 2009
336
1
usa
Originally Posted by STILLSMOK9
I tend to question will Chinese suppliers still ship to us knowing they are banned?

That would be unethical and who knows where theirs are?

why wouldn't they? they've had no problem poisoning our animals with melamine, tooth paste, etc.

the only thing that will regulate them is $$$. Are americans the largest consumer of chinese goods? I haven't a clue.

as in any industry government or private sector, when it hits the pocketbook they are willing to work with you.

personally, I'd rather quit vaping and never go back to analogs (yes i have willpower = I'm not a child) than to let any willy nilly supplier that thinks they will become an overnight millionaire from their bill gates garage tell me what is safe. Let the chinese suppliers jump through the hoops if they want our business.

do I trust the FDA? not a chance. Is anyone else looking out for the health aspects of what we are sucking into our lungs, nasal cavities, mucous membranes?

didn't think so.
 

Vista Chris

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
I'm sure you can safely say, I am pi**ed right now :)

And us California guys are usually so laid back. Well I blogged about what's going on today, and would love any support or comments you can muster.

I'll link to the blog here: Ecigs and the FDA, it's your choice?

Any support/comments are greatly appreciated. It's gonna take all of us to make this right.

Best
 

AVITWeb

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 14, 2009
331
1
New Jersey
They got the samples from the cartridges that come with the SE and NJOY kits.

Sun

Figures...I havent even received my first shipment and all this is coming down!
I really wish they would get their act together!!!! Nothing like putting a spin on things to reward the fu&^nuts!

Lets have them continue to test toys! I will bet they are still extremely dangerous..
 

Sar

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 27, 2009
534
7
New York, NY
why wouldn't they? they've had no problem poisoning our animals with melamine, tooth paste, etc.

the only thing that will regulate them is $$$. Are americans the largest consumer of chinese goods? I haven't a clue.

as in any industry government or private sector, when it hits the pocketbook they are willing to work with you.

personally, I'd rather quit vaping and never go back to analogs (yes i have willpower = I'm not a child) than to let any willy nilly supplier that thinks they will become an overnight millionaire from their bill gates garage tell me what is safe. Let the chinese suppliers jump through the hoops if they want our business.

do I trust the FDA? not a chance. Is anyone else looking out for the health aspects of what we are sucking into our lungs, nasal cavities, mucous membranes?

didn't think so.

China does need the US market, so if US government decides to press them to close the e-cig factories, China will comply. After all, income from ecigs is negligible compared to the rest of trade between China and US.

As far as I know ecigs are already banned in Hong Kong. And recently China prohibited manufacture of eliquid with nic above 24 mg, so the extra-high nic eliquid is drying up too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread