Fda rocks!

[Madame Psychosis]

Imho, what 'we' are up against is the opposite extreme. Where's the moderation, where's the balance? I'm with the other's who oppose the 'nanny-state' that gets to make all of my decisions for me. If I choose to ingest a product that someone else may choose not to, who's been hurt? I make the decision for me, you make the decision for you.

Again, I'm not talking about requiring what's on the label to be what is in the bottle (with nothing else included, to be quite clear) ... I'm talking about the government getting to decide what products are available. Not kosher for this Libertarian-leaning gal.

OK. I think I misinterpreted your statement to mean no government oversight of contents. I suspect we agree pretty well on this: There's an ideal balance -- hard to achieve, but worthy as a goal -- combining freedom of personal choice with safety regulations that prevent dangerous dishonesty in the marketplace.

But the 'assault' here (in this thread's topic, e-cigs are another story) doesn't appear to be coming from any extreme.
I simply find nothing especially alarming in the actual bill the OP is talking about; the wild fears seem quite out of proportion.

 

[AppleJack]

Thank you so much!!