H.R.2058 - FDA Deeming Authority Clarification Act of 2015

[LoriP1702]

Markup of the FY17 Agriculture Appropriations Bill and the FY17 Legislative Branch Appropriations Bill | United States Senate Committee on Appropriations

The site says to "Check back for live video of this hearing."

Senate Committee on AppropriationsDate: Thursday, May 19, 2016
Add to my Calendar
Time: 10:30 AMLocation: Dirksen Senate Office Building 106
Presiding: Chairman Thad Cochran, R-Mississippi


Check back for live video of this hearing.

Edit to add this:

Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration and Related Agencies
Date: Tuesday, May 17, 2016
Add to my Calendar
Time: 04:00 PMLocation: Dirksen Senate Office Building 124
Presiding: Senator Jerry Moran, R-Kansas


Check back for live video of this hearing.

Maybe both days are for this?

Could definitely be both days. It's a long appropriations bill, and since it doesn't start until 4 p.m. tomorrow, can't imagine they'd get all the way through it.

UGH, I'm pretty sure I scrolled right past that BIG box with the "check back" info.

Thank you for pointing me in the right direction!!

 

[LoriP1702]

Well, I may have missed the first part of the broadcast, unless it just started late. I didn't hear any discussion regarding the attached amendment in the broadcast.

I did catch the part that was recommended to be passed with "exception to amendment".
Can anyone else confirm this? Below is what was released for the meeting today.
Nothing regarding the attached amendment.

http://www.appropriations.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/051716-AG-FY17-Subcommittee-Summary-2.pdf

 

[Hulamoon]

Well, I may have missed the first part of the broadcast, unless it just started late. I didn't hear any discussion regarding the attached amendment in the broadcast.

I did catch the part that was recommended to be passed with "exception to amendment".
Can anyone else confirm this? Below is what was released for the meeting today.
Nothing regarding the attached amendment.

http://www.appropriations.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/051716-AG-FY17-Subcommittee-Summary-2.pdf

Lori, Thank you and Bronze for all this. If that amendment is in there, I'm having a real hard time seeing it. Is there someone who does see what I'm failing to?

 

[LoriP1702]

I can't say for sure, because I missed the first part (due to an unexpected phone call I had to take)
...but, I think it may have gotten yanked off the appropriations bill.
I was hoping someone could confirm or deny though.

 

[crxess]

Well, I may have missed the first part of the broadcast, unless it just started late. I didn't hear any discussion regarding the attached amendment in the broadcast.

I did catch the part that was recommended to be passed with "exception to amendment".
Can anyone else confirm this? Below is what was released for the meeting today.
Nothing regarding the attached amendment.

http://www.appropriations.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/051716-AG-FY17-Subcommittee-Summary-2.pdf

That link cannot possibly be the Full Agricultural Budgeting Bill. It is only 4 Pages with minimal documentation.
Is this another Attachment or only a portion of the Bill passed so far?

ETA: The original Bill - Leaving committee - was 100 pages

 

[LoriP1702]

I've been watching at CASAA's FB page, but nothing there that I've seen.

 

[LoriP1702]

That link cannot possibly be the Full Agricultural Budgeting Bill. It is only 4 Pages with minimal documentation.
Is this another Attachment or only a portion of the Bill passed so far?

I don't know, it could be a portion. That's what I'd said a couple days ago, it was a long bill, couldn't imagine they were starting at 4, couldn't imagine they'd get through it all. They meet again on Thurs.
That's why I was hoping someone had caught the first part of the broadcast.

I most definitely heard the part about recommending to be passed "with exception to amendment", but without the first part of the meeting, I'm clueless.

Surely someone else listened.

 

[LoriP1702]

Well, it may be the whole bill...
Majority News Releases | United States Senate Committee on Appropriations

 

[LoriP1702]

...as many as there are posting on the Deeming Reg's thread, surely someone was listening.

 

[Bronze]

Sorry but I haven't been able to keep up with the amendment. I'm sure we'll hear soon.

 

[crxess]

here is some of the Reading from the Committee:

The FDA regulates over 20 percent of every consumer
dollar spent on products in the U.S., and so the Subcommittee re-
minded the FDA to be aware of the comprehensive economic impact
of their regulatory decisions.

http://appropriations.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hrpt-114-hr-fy2017-agriculture.pdf

Reading Cigars in..........................Vapor Products out....

Did I miss it?
http://appropriations.house.gov/uploadedfiles/bills-114hr-fc-ap-fy2017-ap00-agriculture.pdf

See below

 

[LoriP1702]

here is some of the Reading from the Committee:



http://appropriations.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hrpt-114-hr-fy2017-agriculture.pdf

Reading Cigars in..........................Vapor Products out....

Did I miss it?
http://appropriations.house.gov/uploadedfiles/bills-114hr-fc-ap-fy2017-ap00-agriculture.pdf

That's my take as well.
Like I said, they would save their beloved cigars.

ETA: no offense to those who enjoy the fat cigars. Just that they're ALWAYS exempted.

 

[crxess]

here is some of the Reading from the Committee:



http://appropriations.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hrpt-114-hr-fy2017-agriculture.pdf

Reading Cigars in..........................Vapor Products out....

Did I miss it?
http://appropriations.house.gov/uploadedfiles/bills-114hr-fc-ap-fy2017-ap00-agriculture.pdf

ETA: Update, I am not seeing the Agricultural Appropriations as released as of this moment.
The U.S. House of Representatives Committee On Appropriations, Chairman Hal Rogers

 

[LoriP1702]

I'd still like to hear confirmation on this from someone else who might have heard it...
Like I stated about, I know what I heard, but there was no context, just "with exemption to amendment".

I don't know if the entire meeting was broadcast, or only the closing summary regarding the appropriations bill.

 

[LoriP1702]

At some point, they should post the actual "mark up". If they still do that.
I'd found one at one point that had their penciled in notes, and x's through things, from year's past appropriations bills mark ups.
I think that's got to be part of the "legal" record of proceedings...maybe someone else knows.

 

[crxess]

I think we are jumping the gun

Breath in
Breath out

 

[LoriP1702]

That's why I came asking if anyone else listened.
Four ears are better than two...and my two only caught the last half of it.

I see nothing listed in the press release regarding the amendment...in, or out.
But it's certainly not listed...

 

[crxess]

That's why I came asking if anyone else listened.
Four ears are better than two...and my two only caught the last half of it.

I see nothing listed in the press release regarding the amendment...in, or out.
But it's certainly not listed...

Hoping they are only looking at possible budget inclusions and Waste trimming. The Cole Bishop Amendment has no negative Budgetary effect on the agricultural bill

 

[Pamawoman]

I have sent an email to my Florida rep asking if he is going to support the small vaping businesses like he is supporting the small business cigar industry.

I will let you know what he says. I also told him I have many family and friends that support me in my effort to stay off cigarettes. They also vote.
I also told him that there is a bill that I would love for him to get on board with and co-sign. HR2058.

Rubio sent me an interim, Nelson ignored me again and Grayson is probably to busy eating a cow to answer. Maybe someday I will get a response.

 

[Bronze]

Rubio sent me an interim, Nelson ignored me again and Grayson is probably to busy eating a cow to answer. Maybe someday I will get a response.

Grayson....