I too recently quit smoking and took up vaping. Id have to agree with Grace. the nic craving isnt the same. But then again i can smoke when i want so the crazing never rears an ugly face while waiting for my next break or chance to smoke a cig.
That's a much more complicated issue than you might think, and certainly more complicated than some of the anti-smoking extremists would have us think. One thing to keep in mind when you're looking at a list of "ingredients" like that (to be fair), is that the VAST majority of them are naturally occurring chemicals in the tobacco or byproducts of burning the tobacco, and not additives. Frankly, if a person were to take the time to lay out the full chemical composition of a cheeseburger (not just the ingredients) it would probably "look" just as terrifying.
Of the ones that are additives, most of them are not particularly dangerous. Most of the danger comes from inhaling smoke, and all of the horrible unstable compounds created by burning tobacco. That said, MANY of them are additives, and many of those are quite dangerous.
As for the authority, you have to remember that cigarettes pre-date the FDA by a long time, and even when the FDA was formed, it was primarily concerned with food safety. In terms of the big picture, regulation of cigarettes is a comparatively new thing.
While cigarettes have always been bad for the smoker, it's not unreasonable to conclude that the FDA has actually made them worse. Before heavy-handed regulation set in, making a profit from tobacco was as easy as making a profit running a casino. As regulations and taxes cut into profit margins, tobacco companies were forced to find more and more ways to not only make their products cheaper and to circumvent harmful regulations (like the fire ......ants), but also to keep their customers buying as prices went up.
.What's worse, is that some of the chemical additives are actually mandated by the FDA. For instance, all cigarettes must be made with paper that has been treated with fire ......ant chemicals because some genius thought that the fire danger of cigarettes was important enough to make smokers inhale the stuff. That, in turn, forced tobacco companies to add more chemicals to the paper and to the tobacco to at least partially counteract the fire ......ants so a person could smoke a cigarette at a 'normal' pace without it going out
I agree that the most damaging part of smoking is the inhalation of tars and smoke but there are additives:
599 Ingredients added to Cigarettes
Strange that BT are able to manipulate the composition of tobacco to their benefit and our detriment and yet will not formulate a tobacco that is less damaging- main reason is to make smoking even more addictive.
"Our findings indicated that more than 100 of 599 documented cigarette additives have pharmacological actions that camouflage the odor of environmental tobacco smoke emitted from cigarettes, enhance or maintain nicotine delivery, could increase the addictiveness of cigarettes, and mask symptoms and illnesses associated with smoking behaviors."
Pharmacological and Chemical Effects of Cigarette Additives
Best business for the government to be in is anything that's related to addiction- booze, gambling, smoking and from what I can see the list of addictive areas in our lives is ever increasing- fast food for instance, caffeine based drinks...
.
Yes the FDA did mandate that fire ......ant chems be added to analogs but only AFTER Big Tobacco lobbied the FDA in regards to this issue. BT is working hand in hand with Chemical companies to push the widespread use of fire ......ants in everything we use. Some States are beginning to see the light and are fighting back in restricting the use of fire ......ants.
Did you know that the main fire ......ant lobby group is an offshoot/ was formed by a Tobacco Lobby Group?
In my line of work I observe the actions and decisions of the FDA quite often. Although not as corrupt as they once were the FDA is basically an org that has tight allegiances to many large organizations that have a huge monetary vested interest in seeing certain products approved and promoted. The only reason the FDA has improved in the last few yrs was because of the multitude of dangerous and often fatal approval of drugs released to the public as revealed by the media. This became bad news for the FDA when the public became aware of them as being a very large and corrupt public service being manipulated by BP. Has anything really changed with the FDA?...no not really, they've just stepped up their PR game.
I walk out of the kitchen and vape, in fact my boss vapes and I'm allowed to vape in the kitchen. How long have you been vaping?
Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk 2