Has anyone else noticed???

Status
Not open for further replies.

ScubaBebe

Super Member
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 9, 2013
334
447
Wetumpka, Alabama, United States
I smoked for 30 years and except for "finding" my brand in the first few months, I smoked the same brand. Even another ultra light would leave me with a burning sore throat after just a few. I would be very surprised if there is another domestic brand that is more expensive than B&H Deluxe Ultra Lights and because they have consistently gone up they are harder to find if you unexpectedly run out too. Believe me...I would gladly have switched for price and convenience. My point I guess is that I think, in part, I'm having a difficult time finding a ADV or even one I can tolerate for a couple of hours because I am so used to the same product. But, I do find the craving is different. Right now I am smoking 4 to 5 "real cigs" a day but that's down from about a pack and a half a day habit. I can deal with that for now and I am not feeling deprived. I think when I find my ADV I can put them down without too much problem.
 

Vapoor eyes er

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Sep 13, 2011
11,028
8,945
Toronto, Ont.
That's a much more complicated issue than you might think, and certainly more complicated than some of the anti-smoking extremists would have us think. One thing to keep in mind when you're looking at a list of "ingredients" like that (to be fair), is that the VAST majority of them are naturally occurring chemicals in the tobacco or byproducts of burning the tobacco, and not additives. Frankly, if a person were to take the time to lay out the full chemical composition of a cheeseburger (not just the ingredients) it would probably "look" just as terrifying.

Of the ones that are additives, most of them are not particularly dangerous. Most of the danger comes from inhaling smoke, and all of the horrible unstable compounds created by burning tobacco. That said, MANY of them are additives, and many of those are quite dangerous.

As for the authority, you have to remember that cigarettes pre-date the FDA by a long time, and even when the FDA was formed, it was primarily concerned with food safety. In terms of the big picture, regulation of cigarettes is a comparatively new thing.
While cigarettes have always been bad for the smoker, it's not unreasonable to conclude that the FDA has actually made them worse. Before heavy-handed regulation set in, making a profit from tobacco was as easy as making a profit running a casino. As regulations and taxes cut into profit margins, tobacco companies were forced to find more and more ways to not only make their products cheaper and to circumvent harmful regulations (like the fire ......ants), but also to keep their customers buying as prices went up.

I agree that the most damaging part of smoking is the inhalation of tars and smoke but there are additives:
599 Ingredients added to Cigarettes
Strange that BT are able to manipulate the composition of tobacco to their benefit and our detriment and yet will not formulate a tobacco that is less damaging- main reason is to make smoking even more addictive.

"Our findings indicated that more than 100 of 599 documented cigarette additives have pharmacological actions that camouflage the odor of environmental tobacco smoke emitted from cigarettes, enhance or maintain nicotine delivery, could increase the addictiveness of cigarettes, and mask symptoms and illnesses associated with smoking behaviors."
Pharmacological and Chemical Effects of Cigarette Additives

Best business for the government to be in is anything that's related to addiction- booze, gambling, smoking and from what I can see the list of addictive areas in our lives is ever increasing- fast food for instance, caffeine based drinks...

What's worse, is that some of the chemical additives are actually mandated by the FDA. For instance, all cigarettes must be made with paper that has been treated with fire ......ant chemicals because some genius thought that the fire danger of cigarettes was important enough to make smokers inhale the stuff. That, in turn, forced tobacco companies to add more chemicals to the paper and to the tobacco to at least partially counteract the fire ......ants so a person could smoke a cigarette at a 'normal' pace without it going out
.
Yes the FDA did mandate that fire ......ant chems be added to analogs but only AFTER Big Tobacco lobbied the FDA in regards to this issue. BT is working hand in hand with Chemical companies to push the widespread use of fire ......ants in everything we use. Some States are beginning to see the light and are fighting back in restricting the use of fire ......ants.
Did you know that the main fire ......ant lobby group is an offshoot/ was formed by a Tobacco Lobby Group?
In my line of work I observe the actions and decisions of the FDA quite often. Although not as corrupt as they once were the FDA is basically an org that has tight allegiances to many large organizations that have a huge monetary vested interest in seeing certain products approved and promoted. The only reason the FDA has improved in the last few yrs was because of the multitude of dangerous and often fatal approval of drugs released to the public as revealed by the media. This became bad news for the FDA when the public became aware of them as being a very large and corrupt public service being manipulated by BP. Has anything really changed with the FDA?...no not really, they've just stepped up their PR game.
 
Last edited:

xjonquilx

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 12, 2013
187
165
FL
The wondering can stop here.

You're not just addicted to the nicotine in cigarettes, and while companies DO make them more addictive by doing things like adding extra nicotine & tar, there's no special chemicals they add to get you hooked (that I know of). There are also a lot of carcinogens in tobacco that are highly addictive (and also happen to be the same ones that give you cancer); some are even more addictive than nicotine itself. When you quit smoking to vape, that's why you still have withdrawal symptoms... because you removed the carcinogens from your intake. That's why some people have to buy liquid tar or buy juice that has tar already added to it in order to quit smoking for vaping - the carcinogens can be so addictive that even when they switch to a nicotine replacement method they aren't able to quit until it provides the same stuff they got in smokes other than the nicotine.
 

xjonquilx

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 12, 2013
187
165
FL
I agree that the most damaging part of smoking is the inhalation of tars and smoke but there are additives:
599 Ingredients added to Cigarettes
Strange that BT are able to manipulate the composition of tobacco to their benefit and our detriment and yet will not formulate a tobacco that is less damaging- main reason is to make smoking even more addictive.

"Our findings indicated that more than 100 of 599 documented cigarette additives have pharmacological actions that camouflage the odor of environmental tobacco smoke emitted from cigarettes, enhance or maintain nicotine delivery, could increase the addictiveness of cigarettes, and mask symptoms and illnesses associated with smoking behaviors."
Pharmacological and Chemical Effects of Cigarette Additives

Best business for the government to be in is anything that's related to addiction- booze, gambling, smoking and from what I can see the list of addictive areas in our lives is ever increasing- fast food for instance, caffeine based drinks...

.
Yes the FDA did mandate that fire ......ant chems be added to analogs but only AFTER Big Tobacco lobbied the FDA in regards to this issue. BT is working hand in hand with Chemical companies to push the widespread use of fire ......ants in everything we use. Some States are beginning to see the light and are fighting back in restricting the use of fire ......ants.
Did you know that the main fire ......ant lobby group is an offshoot/ was formed by a Tobacco Lobby Group?
In my line of work I observe the actions and decisions of the FDA quite often. Although not as corrupt as they once were the FDA is basically an org that has tight allegiances to many large organizations that have a huge monetary vested interest in seeing certain products approved and promoted. The only reason the FDA has improved in the last few yrs was because of the multitude of dangerous and often fatal approval of drugs released to the public as revealed by the media. This became bad news for the FDA when the public became aware of them as being a very large and corrupt public service being manipulated by BP. Has anything really changed with the FDA?...no not really, they've just stepped up their PR game.

Agreed. I have long suspected this war they're raging on e-cigs just boils down to them not wanting to lose all those valuable cigarette tax dollars to the trend... and not wanting smokers to actually be able to easily quit because of that financial loss...
 

stefania123

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 5, 2013
478
542
Los Angeles
I was just reading about Nicotine on wikipedia.. and though they say it is very addictive on its own.. they also say this which i find very interesting..

*snip* In the central nervous system
Effect of nicotine on dopaminergic neurons.

By binding to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, nicotine increases the levels of several neurotransmitters – acting as a sort of "volume control". It is thought that increased levels of dopamine in the reward circuits of the brain are responsible for the apparent euphoria and relaxation, and addiction caused by nicotine consumption. Nicotine has a higher affinity for acetylcholine receptors in the brain than those in skeletal muscle, though at toxic doses it can induce contractions and respiratory paralysis.[31] Nicotine's selectivity is thought to be due to a particular amino acid difference on these receptor subtypes.[32]

Tobacco smoke contains anabasine, anatabine, and nornicotine. It also contains the monoamine oxidase inhibitors harman and norharman.[33] These beta-carboline compounds significantly decrease MAO activity in smokers.[33][34] MAO enzymes break down monoaminergic neurotransmitters such as dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin. It is thought that the powerful interaction between the MAOIs and the nicotine is responsible for most of the addictive properties of tobacco smoking.
 
Last edited:

rebgold

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 27, 2013
307
387
57
Wichita, KS
My boss vapes too and I'm allowed to vape in the kitchen but it's not the same as going outside with everyone for a break. I don't know, I spend my days off at home vaping and never think about real cigarettes. Then I go to work and I want analogs. I think I'll get over it eventually.


I walk out of the kitchen and vape, in fact my boss vapes and I'm allowed to vape in the kitchen. How long have you been vaping?

Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk 2
 

Fred Garvin

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
When I first started, I found ecigs satisfying, but there was a little something missing....never did put my finger on it. I would tell people it was like the difference between Coke and Diet Coke....close, but not quite the same.

Eventually I got used to it so no longer notice.
 

stefania123

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 5, 2013
478
542
Los Angeles
been doing some research on the other natural chemicals in tobacco, harman and norharman as mentioned above.. these are in passion fruit extract too. i picked up a bottle today and have been putting some drops in my water i drink when i vape.. it did have some calming effect. also learned about WTA's through this forum, i may get some to have around for the rough spots if i should hit them. being relatively new at quitting analogs, but liking the no smell/future health benefits.. i REALLY do not want to go back to analogs, ever.
 

stefania123

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 5, 2013
478
542
Los Angeles
I just wanted to update you on the effects of drinking Passion Flower extract in water a little while ago.. the 'edge' i was experiencing of needing to chain vape and still missing something has pretty much completely gone away. It took about an hour after i drank it (about 70 drops split in 2 glasses of water) to completely kick in. Still vaping but.. not on edge, very calm.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread