- Apr 2, 2009
- 5,171
- 13,288
- 67
Hawaii legislation (HB 672 & SB 652) would ban the sale of e-cigarettes to minors, would require all retailers (who allow youth into their store) to locate tobacco and e-cigs behind retail counters, ban tobacco and e-cig advertisements within 4 feet of floor and within 25 feet of candy, cookies, gum, ice cream, snacks or children’s products.
Measure Status
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2013/bills/SB652_.pdf
Measure Status=
The House Health Committee held a hearing on HB 672 today, and deferred action until the 13th of February.
Testimony already submitted is at
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2013/Testimony/HB672_TESTIMONY_HLT_02-08-13_.PDF
The only testimony submitted in support of HB 672 was by Coalition for a tobacco Free Hawaii, while about 60 comments opposed the bill.
SB 652 was referred to Senate Health Cmte, which scheduled a hearing for Feb 6th and then deferred action till Feb 11th.
Testimony can be submitted
Measure Status
The HI AG submitted testimony opposed SB 652 largely because the US Supreme Court already ruled that nearly identical advertising restrictions in MA were unconstitutional (in Lorillard v Reilly).
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2013/Testimony/SB652_TESTIMONY_HTH_02-04-13.PDF
The Hawaii Food Industry Association and virtuall all tobacco retailers in HI allso opposes the bill.
In 696 pages of submitted testimony, about 25 comments supported the bill, and about 650 comments opposed the bill.
Looks like both of these bill will be defeated.
But two other bills were introduced in HI to ban e-cig sales to minors. See next post.
Measure Status
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2013/bills/SB652_.pdf
Measure Status=
The House Health Committee held a hearing on HB 672 today, and deferred action until the 13th of February.
Testimony already submitted is at
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2013/Testimony/HB672_TESTIMONY_HLT_02-08-13_.PDF
The only testimony submitted in support of HB 672 was by Coalition for a tobacco Free Hawaii, while about 60 comments opposed the bill.
SB 652 was referred to Senate Health Cmte, which scheduled a hearing for Feb 6th and then deferred action till Feb 11th.
Testimony can be submitted
Measure Status
The HI AG submitted testimony opposed SB 652 largely because the US Supreme Court already ruled that nearly identical advertising restrictions in MA were unconstitutional (in Lorillard v Reilly).
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2013/Testimony/SB652_TESTIMONY_HTH_02-04-13.PDF
The Hawaii Food Industry Association and virtuall all tobacco retailers in HI allso opposes the bill.
In 696 pages of submitted testimony, about 25 comments supported the bill, and about 650 comments opposed the bill.
Looks like both of these bill will be defeated.
But two other bills were introduced in HI to ban e-cig sales to minors. See next post.
Last edited: