HCigar VT200

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well i decided to check and unwrap my battery..... the dead cell one.... it seem's its made by a company call dbk "
SHENZHEN DBK ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD ..." meaby?
here are the marking on each cell....

Code:
GBAF653062P 1300mAh
DBK 15P61402A

i was missing a cell because of 1 little metal bridge that connect the poles...
lipo-disconected.jpg

all 3 cell now detected on balance charger


i ordered some xt30 connector and a battery from hobby king (1300mah right dimension)... hehe will test it later!
 

Attachments

  • lipo-disconected.jpg
    lipo-disconected.jpg
    783.3 KB · Views: 95
  • lipo-unwrap.jpg
    lipo-unwrap.jpg
    897.6 KB · Views: 100
  • lipo-connecttest1.jpg
    lipo-connecttest1.jpg
    249.9 KB · Views: 96

Tpat591

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 28, 2014
2,728
9,711
RB nj
Well i decided to check and unwrap my battery..... the dead cell one.... it seem's its made by a company call dbk "
SHENZHEN DBK ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD ..." meaby?
here are the marking on each cell....

Code:
GBAF653062P 1300mAh
DBK 15P61402A

i was missing a cell because of 1 little metal bridge that connect the poles...View attachment 497043
all 3 cell now detected on balance charger


i ordered some xt30 connector and a battery from hobby king (1300mah right dimension)... hehe will test it later!
You are saying the idiot that soldered it together jumped out cell number three by bridging tabs on oppose sides of the cell between the red and blue wires? tough to see.
 

kraze6548

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 24, 2015
136
81
43
The DNA200 is making an assumption that the resistance it reads is partially mod resistance, If you measure and set mod resistance in escribe, is should get close to the same. So, for a .2 coil for example your first mod fires it as if it was a .2 coil. The dna fires it as if it was a .2 coil less the value it has for mod resistance.
I set mine at .0045 . I did the atomizer anyl. And came up with .006 so 80 percent I guessed would be .004. It just seems off. I can get the same vape just take a Lil more watts and temp
 

AlbinoDegenerate

Full Member
Oct 2, 2015
20
8
30
I just set my mod resistance to .0045 w/o measuring (I'll get to it later, just wanted to see what happened) and the vape quality increased a pretty noticeable amount

Strongly recommend to anyone who hasn't done it yet

This incredibly impactful n=2 study also seems to imply that either I got incredibly lucky and this worked even though I was totally off, or that the mod resistances are pretty uniform across the prod. Line
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mackman

Portertown

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 20, 2013
1,103
1,304
Greenville, NC, USA
I have been following this thread since it was created and it looks like most users of the HCigar VT200 are satisfied with them.
So I ordered one last night from Ecig-City and hopefully it will arrive early next week as it is on it's way. I am building a mod with the DNA200 board that will use three 18650 batteries and I wanted a smaller DNA200 mod also, so I decided to try the HCigar VT200.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AtmizrOpin

f1vefour

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Dec 3, 2013
6,212
13,535
Emerald Coast
I don't see what the big deal is with the brass 510, I have a Stingray mech that is brass and has been thoroughly abused (dropped countless times) and that 510 is still flawless after over a year.

Look at all the mechs with copper 510's, few to no issues there either.

Thick brass is quite durable really, it's not stainless durable but still plenty sturdy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rockwell222

Rockwell222

Super Member
Sep 21, 2015
468
423
36
I believe that's what one of the reviewers said was naval brass or close to it. I've had no problems with mine I absolutely love the thing. I am missing my vaporshark but it's on it's way back from repair. If I had to choose between the two I think I would pick the VT200. I only got to use the shark for 2 days so maybe I'll change my mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: f1vefour

AlbinoDegenerate

Full Member
Oct 2, 2015
20
8
30
The reason the brass threads in mechs last is because they're threaded all the way through the 510 hole + distribute the force over a larger surface area

Brass threads on mods have failed in the past because they were too shallow, but the ones on the vt200 look to be long enough to hold up well

Obviously only time will tell but if you look at the 510 inserts on the vt200 vs the past hcigar that was reported to fail, it looks like they're significantly longer
 

Carnage9270

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 27, 2015
786
1,158
Washington
It's kind of funny, people always question the metals that are typically used because of their soft characteristics, but never really consider that they can be made as a alloy as well. Titanium for example is considered to be a hard metal. It's not, it's actually very soft. It's when it's made as an alloy that it becomes so fantastic.

There are different grades of stainless steel, many are very soft. But when people typically think of stainless steel, they think of a nice durable hard metal. Most stainless steel grades are extremely easy to strip or cross thread. The brass 510 connection on this mod is plenty durable. Yes, you can cross thread it, but stainless steel is just as susceptible. This brass is very tough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cimon
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread