HEADS UP - NEWS - UPDATES! (When we know, you'll know!)

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
Study participants smoked but had never vaped before. Both smoking & vaping delayed blood vessels from dilating back to normal (as does caffeine.) It's long been understood that people with PREEXISTING heart conditions should avoid nicotine/caffeine.

Researchers did not appear to take into consideration that carbon monoxide, which also has been linked to atherosclerosis, is present in cigarette smoke but NOT present in e-cigarette vapor. Eliminating carbon monoxide exposure means less risk to the heart. That means SAFER.

Furthermore, in 2013 the FDA stopped requiring nicotine gum labels to advise only 12 weeks of use, because studies showed "adverse effects...were described as MINOR AND TRANSIENT, and there was NO CORRELATION between long-term gum use and cardiovascular events." So, nicotine gum doesn’t appear to raise the risk of heart attack, but somehow nicotine vapes do? Hmmm...something is fishy here.

 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
Unsurprisingly, a former "Drug Czar" misleads the public about a drug.

He falsely suggests that a "number of kids are dying" from disposable nicotine vapes and his warning that they "may contain the dangerous opioid fentanyl" is pure scaremongering.

But we do agree with him that the "new Texas law punishing kids who vape is too aggressive." The law requires “students caught with vapes at the school to be placed in an alternative schooling environment, or Disciplinary Alternative Education Program (DAEP) even if it’s their FIRST OFFENSE.” Nicotine is not a controlled substance, nor is it intoxicating. Such harsh punishment should be reserved for truly dangerous behavior, not something as low risk as vaping nicotine.

 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
The FDA seems proud that it has managed to "authorize 23 e-cigarettes" (out of MILLIONS of products.)

In reality, the agency authorized just SEVEN e-cig devices and 12 refills since 2020 (and NONE have been authorized since July 2022.) ALL of the products are only authorized to be sold with artificial "tobacco" flavored e-liquid.

 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
Note how they don't mention what the "negative impacts" of snus use are -- because there really aren't any other than possible dependency.

Mr. Murphy should be happy that, rather than smoke as he did, the current generation is choosing to NOT SMOKE.

 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
"The results of this study alleviate the concern that access to e-cigarettes and other low-risk nicotine products promote smoking. There is no sign of that, and there are some signs that they in fact compete against cigarettes..."
~ Professor Peter Hajek, Director of Health and Lifestyle Research Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London

 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
CASAA LIVE
This week's guest is Corey Pegues, a retired NY Deputy Inspector, who joins Alex and Logan to discuss the FDA's looming ban on menthol, illicit markets for tobacco/nicotine products, and if harm reduction can help solve issues between law enforcement and the communities they serve.

Catch the show LIVE tomorrow, Saturday September 23rd at 4:30PM ET/3:30PM CT!

How_Will_Menthol_Ban_Impact_Policing_with_Corey_Pegues.png
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
CASAA BLOG

FDA's Special Math for vaping products. CASAA in the news and at GTNF. New study finds there's still no "gateway" to smoking. An asthma study with a timing problem. Former "Drug Czar" unsurprisingly misleads the public. Engineering a snus panic and more!

 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
Another study finds vaping isn't leading to smoking. How many more will it take for this myth to finally be considered DEBUNKED?

"The emergence of e-cigarettes has coincided with THE MOST RAPID DECLINES IN CIGARETTE USE over the past thirty years."


Screenshot (448).png
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
In a country that is the second largest producer of tobacco in the world and where approximately 100 MILLION people ages 15 and older SMOKE, it's ILLEGAL to even POSSESS a product that is at least 95% safer than smoking.

It's unconscionable.

 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
After reviewing the data, this new study finds that any public health benefits of reducing youth #vaping via flavor restrictions and/or bans may be "offset by public health costs from increased cigarette sales."

Put simply, flavor bans increase smoking.

 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
"The TRUTH is [vaping is] a promising harm reduction option for people who would smoke anyway....

Restrictions on e-cigarettes might undo years of public health progress."
~ Peter Clark

 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
After Finland ceased classifying higher nicotine pouches as "medicines," smuggling of (very low risk) snus has dramatically decreased. Australia, which created a huge illicit market by requiring a prescription for vapor products, could learn from this.

 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
“We seem to have reached peak dishonesty in parts of the health community. Instead of celebrating and sharing the good news that we have nicotine products that substitute for smoking and are likely to be at least 95 percent less risky, we have doctors declaring that it would be better to lie to the public, and pretend all these products are equally dangerous in the hope they won’t use them.”
~ Clive Bates

 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
The good news is that this study will be one of the very few that actually compares the effects of vaping to smoking.

However, when it comes to comparing it to never-smoking, it would be disingenuous not to compare vaping to other risks that society deems "acceptable." For example, how much more of a health risk is vaping compared to consuming coffee or alcohol, or activities such as cycling, rock climbing, parachuting, etc.?

 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
PMI has developed heat-not-burn sticks (LEVIA) that don't contain tobacco but a "non-tobacco substrate" infused with nicotine and various flavors. The product may avoid the punitive taxes and restrictions imposed on other low risk tobacco products.

 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
"Industry observers...have been talking about the growing neo-prohibition movement for a while now. The new story is about making alcoholic beverages less socially acceptable, like with tobacco.”

Tobacco, now nicotine, next alcohol. When will it end?

 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
This article was going fairly well until it said "One of the most common health risks is popcorn lung." This is patently false. Vaping has NOT been shown to cause "popcorn lung," a condition typically linked to inhaling "oils" that are NOT found in vapes.

 

Ipster

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 8, 2012
1,070
1,980
Hawaii, SAR,HongKong (Stanley)
Hands down one of the worst supposed "Medical" news presentations I've seen. What a mess this article is!
First and foremost, theres no peer review. Always, always, always look for peer reviewed bona fide studies including resources, study size, control groups, and more. A single opinion in any industry magazine whether health care or automobile care, is like a tuchus. Everyone has one. Verify!
The writing is so convoluted it's hilarious. We all know Vaporizors release vapor, not "smoke" as in combustibles. Submitting articles to any publication willing to accept them doesn't give them merit, or readability. No editing. Look at this sentence- "inhaling e-cigarette smoke could be damaging neutrophils, the first line of defense in the human immune system. The findings are important as previous research has shown that damage caused to neutrophil by cigarette smoking can lead to long-term lung damage"
WTH? OK either choose to write about damages caused by cigarette "SMOKE" or choose to write about e-cigarette vapor emissions.
Unfortunately the remainder of this article continues to obfuscate between tobacco cigarettes and e-cigarettes. It's not only in the misuse of the wording for vapor, but a deliberate comparison in terms of supposed, yet undocumented health risks.
Im an ardent supporter of CASAA, I won't change my opinion over choice in re published articles. I recommend to ECF readers that they always seek out peer reviewed medical studies, check the references footnotes and supporting research. Its rarer to see a dozen or more tuchuses in agreement reviewing data, which seemed missing as well.
 

Users who are viewing this thread